Technology dependence gladstone and neufeld s the

Pages: 1

Is Technology Changing Us

People have various opinions upon technology. Some people feel that the positives outway the downsides when it comes to technology, while others go through the exact contrary. Nicholas Carr argues in the essay “Is Google Making us stupid”, that people are becoming overly determined by technology. Carr explains how people are thus influenced simply by technology, that they cannot kind their own ideas. Gladstone and Neufeld in “The Influencing Machine” assume that people may appear too dependent on technology although that people should worry a whole lot about it, since in the past a similar thing happened with writing and television. My spouse and i lean to agreeing even more with Gladstone and Neufeld, I feel just like even though things are changing as a result of technology that does not necessarily mean that technology is a bad issue.

Carr uses many examples to try and show the reader for what reason they should actually fear the world wide web. Carr talks about the difficulties him and others started out having while they read. He seems this is because with the formatting and style that articles online happen to be posted. When ever things are placed online they’re short and straight to the idea because they don’t wish to lose peoples’ attention, Which makes Carr feel as if that’s why he can unable to concentrate on longer piece of writing, like magazine articles or novels. One more thing pointed out is the fact today people read differently than people during the past which may trigger people to transform their thinking. Carr items this simple fact out when he says “We may well be learning much more today than we did in the 1970s or perhaps 1980s, the moment television was our method of choice. But it’s a different kind of reading, and to it lies a different sort of kind of thinking”perhaps even a fresh sense from the self. “(Carr 318). Some individuals agree with Carr’s point and feel that this sort of change in considering is a thing that should be dreaded.

Gladstone and Neufeld take the approach to attempt to explain how people are changing because of technology, but is actually not necessarily a bad thing. They discuss how people are getting attached to items like their cell phones and personal computers but that folks should not be concerned because people are going to change with technology. Carr and other naysayers to technology are mentioned in their documents and their worries are taken into account, instead of disagreeing with people Gladstone and Neifeld agree that technology can be shaping heads, but individuals minds get shaped when ever things are changing. People reacted the same way since Carr more than technology as simple as writing, and the tv. It may be a great overreaction, yet every time a thing substantial comes out, gowns how some individuals are going to action. It’ h mentioned in Gladstone and Neufeld’s essay that it may always be harder for people over the age of 35 to adjust to new technologies, which is almost certainly why Carr’s approach to technology is so skeptical. Over time everybody’s minds happen to be changing due to new inventions and the various kinds of technology, therefore people should certainly realize that they cannot fix this problem and just go along with the general movement of issues.

Gladstone and Neufeld’s approach to technology is much more rational and rational than Carr’s in my opinion since there is no explanation people should fear technical advances. The mind is always becoming shaped by simply technology and that should be accepted. Gladstone and Neufeld mention how they can appreciate where folks are coming from, but don’t think it’s a difficulty, which I support. I think that naysayers is going to think that even though this occurred in the past with items like the television really different because of how really changing anything, everybodys on there phone and you could get details at the feel of a button. The world changes due to inventions such as the internet, which can be should, and so instead of persons being concerned with big adjustments, they should accept them.