Such benefits, if normal, would have a dramatic effect on the bottom line of any company that implements this sort of programs. Simply by definition, this improves staff productivity ($ value outcome per employee).
Inside our company, drug abuse by workers is a serious problem, and the effects mirror those of other companies in the developed globe. While we do not experience significant rates of injuries as the result of substance abuse, we do experience the additional negative results that are connected with substance abuse at work – absenteeism and shed productivity especially. There are pervasive negative effects around the culture with the organization too, with worker resentment happening, but yet not being manifested in either stigmatization or support.
As with the majority of firms, we understand that it can be in all likelihood less difficult and more affordable to address substance abuse issues with automobile than you should find, work with and teach new employees. As such, an application of approaches has been advised that has been demonstrated in the field to have positive influences on substance abuse rates and effects. The overarching theme of the program is a intent to change the organizational tradition with respect to substance abuse. The current traditions simply will not handle the situation well. The organizational traditions can be changed through increased education and training, increased prevention and intervention expenditure and the implementation of random testing.
These tactics can all in order to change the sociable norms inside the company in two ways. The foremost is by launching social rules that especially identify drug abuse as a essential problem in the workplace. The second is by demonstrating for the workforce that management usually takes the issue of drug abuse seriously and is willing to addresses the issue in a positive, productive manner. These kinds of tactics will need to improve the price of staff buy-in, bringing about the desired culture shift and resulting confident outcomes. The literature on the subject supports the program’s efficiency and provides guidance for the execution of these tactics as well.
Bacharach, S.; Bamberger, P. Biron, M. (2010). Alcohol consumption and workplace absenteeism: The moderating effect of support. Journal of Applied Mindset. Vol. ninety five (2) 334-348.
Cook, L.; Back, A. Trudeau, T. (1996). Substance abuse prevention in the workplace: Recent results and a great expanded conceptual model. Journal of Major Prevention. Volume. 16 (3) 319-339.
Cook, R. Schlenger, W. (2002). Prevention of substance abuse in the workplace: Review of analysis on the delivery of companies. Journal of Primary Reduction. Vol. twenty-three (1) 115-142.
FSIPP. (2010). Prescription drug abuse in the workplace rising. Centre Daily Times. Recovered October twenty-three, 2010 coming from http://www.centredaily.com/2010/10/21/2287321/prescription-drug-abuse-in-the.html
Gmel, G. Rehm, J. (2003). Harmful alcoholic beverages use. Alcohol Research Well being. Vol. twenty-seven, 2003.
Jaffer, N.; Jamieson, B.; Kennedy, J.; Khan, J.; Knox, H.; Koenig, E.; Kother, D. Lamb, J. (2008). Resources of relevance to occupational counselors working to help employees whose misuse of alcohol impacts the workplace. University of Alberta. Retrieved March 23, 2010 from http://www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/ot/pdfs/Selected%20Resources%20book%20MAy%202009.pdf#page=30
Keleman, M. (1995). Tips on how to recognize substance abuse in the workplace. Supervision. Retrieved August 23, 2010 from http://www.allbusiness.com/human-resources/workforce-management/520699-1.html
Mehay, H. Pacula, 3rd there’s r. (1999). The effectiveness of workplace drug prevention procedures: Does actually zero tolerance job? NBER Functioning Paper Number w7383.
Miller, T.; Zaloshnja, T. Spicer, R. (2006). Effectiveness and benefit-cost of peer-based office substance abuse prevention coupled with randomly testing. Crash Analysis Prevention. Vol. 39 (3) 565-573.
OSHA. (2010). Workplace drug abuse. Occupational Security Health Administration. Retrieved March 23, 2010 from http://220.127.116.11/SLTC/substanceabuse/index.html
Reynolds, G.; Lehman, T. Bennett, J. (2008). Psychological correlates of the perceived stigma of issue drinking in the workplace. Journal of Primary Elimination. Vol. 29 (4) 341-356.
SAMHSA. (2010). Why you should care about having a
We can write an essay on your own custom topics!Check the Price