Professional values essay

Legal Integrity, Conceptualization, Code Of Ethics, Professionalism

Excerpt from Dissertation:

Professional Ethics – Eggertson v. Alberta Instructors Association

Legal Case Analysis

The goal of this function is to examine the case Eggertson v. Alberta Teacher’s Association and to initially, state the important points of the case and to answer for the highest court’s decision in cases like this as well as the key points of regulation as define by the judge in the reason of the decision in this case. In the event this case had a majority and a group judgment, the points in each will probably be outlined as well as the question solved of the particular implications are to the professional and classroom practice in the teacher. This kind of work will discuss how this case pertains to the chapter readings and describe a similar example of this sort of situation. Finally, the copy writer will solution how the case affects the perception in the situation.

Details of the Case

This case involves a teacher, the appellant in such a case, who is utilized with the Calgary Board of Education. The appellant is usually reported to have been “charged and found doing unprofessional conduct by a experiencing committeeappointed by ATA’s Specialist Conduct Panel. ” ( p. 2) The instructor is reported to have attended a meeting with the school upon September 26, 1997, to help teachers and parents a change to fulfill and discuss the students. The appellant can be reported since having stated to the father and mother of a few of the children that last years’ teacher last year did not instruct the children whatever. The appellant is reported as having been charged with violating h. 13 from the ATA’s Code of Specialist Conduct. The code of professional carry out states specifically as follows:

II. Key Points of Law

It truly is reported which the Code aims minimum yet , not finish standards of professional execute that instructors must follow. Section 13 of the ATA Code is in ok bye to the critique of professional colleagues the following:

13. The teacher criticizes the professional competence or perhaps professional trustworthiness of another teacher only in confidence to proper officials and after the other instructor has been educated of the criticism. (O’Leary, Costigan, and Paperny, 2002, p. 5)

Section 22 of the Teaching Occupation Act makes the following provision:

22(1) Any kind of conduct of your member that, in the judgment of a reading committee, Can be detrimental to the best interests of: (a) Pupils as defined in the School Act, (i) The public, or (ii) The teaching occupation, (b) Contravenesa bylaw manufactured under section 8(f)., or (c) Harms or hopes to damage the ranking of teachers generally, regardless of whether that conduct is indecent or infamous, May be discovered by a experiencing committee to constitute not professional conduct. (O’Leary, Costigan, and Paperny, 2002, p. 5)

The PCAC found that the appellant was guilty of misconduct. The appellant filed pertaining to judicial review and that application for review was dismissed as there is not found by the researching judge to be any “procedural unfairness. inches (O’Leary, Costigan, and Paperny, 2002, s. 6)

We. Appeals Court docket Ruling

It can be reported that the Supreme The courtroom of Canada erred in not according “adequate excess weight to the