Learning Enviroment and Its Effects on Student Academic Performance in ...

In Nigeria, second education is the education children receive following primary education and ahead of the tertiary level. Consequently, the broad desired goals of supplementary education happen to be geared to put together the individual to get useful living within the culture and to progress to higher education (Federal Federal government of Nigeria, 2004). The school at this level is established so that students can learn in order to be able to transfer knowledge from a single generation to another for the continuity and well-being in the society. Learning as a theoretical construct can simply be deduced from observable behavior.

Specialists usually specify learning being a relatively long term change in behavior due to previous experience or maybe the process in which relatively long term changes occur in behavioral possibilities as a result of Experience (Gross, 2010) In fact , second school education is a great investment and an instrument that can be used to obtain a more rapid economic, sociable, political, scientific, scientific and cultural creation in the country. The role of secondary education is to place a solid groundwork for better academic overall performance of students in their quest for university education and in other higher establishments with the purpose of producing proficient manpower for the growth and development of the country.

Recent styles in this tier of education in Nigeria show poor academic comes from our children. The preponderance of mass failure in the final examinations done by various examination physiques (WAEC, NECO NABTEB) has led to the hue and cry by just about anybody over students’ poor academic performance. It is clear that tier of education has become seriously endangered by total near collapse as obvious by students’ abysmal overall performance in 2011 examination results in Nigeria. Dissenting groups have approved the blame of students’ poor performance on teachers, father and mother and authorities policy somersault.

According to Aremu and Sokan (2003), and Aremu and Oluwole (2001), second school students’ poor functionality may be hinged on students because of their low retention, parent factors, relationship with incorrect peers and motivation. Past research facts showed that poor academic performance on the secondary school level of education can be described as product of teacher, university and the residence environment. In respect to Morakinyo (2003), the falling degree of academic overall performance of extra school pupils is due to teachers’ non-use of verbal reinforcement.

Also the home environment or family members background of learners affects their academic performance (Ajila & Olutola, 2007) The sharp fall in the academics performance in various amounts of our educational system in Nigeria is largely attributed to the indegent conditions inside our educational institutions. For instance , lack of contemporary instructional technology, poor class conditions and lack of satisfactory training programs for educators. Similarly, class learning conditions and college factors apply some major influence about learners, since man is actually a product of his environment. The importance of learning environment to a effective academic success cannot be overemphasized.

The learning environment includes school location and physical complexes, laboratory gear, library providers and components, instructional supports and effective classroom managing. Intelligence is definitely not the only determinant of educational achievement. Learning environment affects the academic achievements of a pupil. According to Basque and Dore (1998), learning and teaching environment ought to put into action six functions: inform, connect, collaborate, develop, scaffold and manage. They added that conceptually speaking, the learning environment refers to the full range of pieces and actions within which in turn learning happens.

Learning environment that is free of barriers or distraction just like noise, gas/smoke pollution etc, will encourage students’ attentiveness or perceptual focus to learning (Sprinthall, 1987). Similarly, the entire unattractive physical framework of the institution building may demotivate students to achieve academically. This mismatch promotes poor academic overall performance. Danesty (2004) stated that dilapidating building lacking mental stimulating services that are characterized with low or no sitting down arrangement, may also affect students’ learning.

Course size has also been identified as a determinant of educational performance. Schools with small class size perform better academically than schools with larger course size. Energi (1994) in his study of the ideal course size and its effects on effective teaching and learning concluded that virtually any class size above forty (40) provides negative effects on students’ success. Generally, very good teaching is best done in classes with tiny numbers that allow for individual interest.

Teachers make a difference to motivate pupils in learning, doing work in tandem with parents who have are the initially teachers to children. Noordin, Azizi, Jamaludin, Shahrin and Zurihanmi (2010) opined that teachers will make school your life miserable or perhaps appealing by simply filling the classroom with excitement and hope. Students will continue in their learning and even search for more knowledge under the leading of keen teacher (Wlodkowski & Jaynes, 1990).

Atkinson (2000) discovered a positive romance between teachers’ motivation as well as the students’ performance. The availability and use of educating and learning materials impact the effectiveness of any teacher’s lesson. The use of a variety of media enhances the probability the fact that students might learn more which young children are equipped for understanding fuzy ideas if they happen to be provided with adequate materials and concrete experience of the trends that they are to comprehend. Adu and Olatundun (2007), Adediwura and Tayo (2007), and Legend (2002) advised that powerful teaching is actually a significant predictor for students’ academic achievement.

In short, poor academic overall performance of college students has been related to poor teachers’ performance with regards to accomplishing learning tasks (Ofoegbu, 2004; Asikhia, 2010). Your home environment or perhaps family background of college students affects all their academic efficiency (Ajila and Olutola 2007; Nzewuawah, 1995; Ichado, 1998). The home environment sharpens the child’s preliminary view of learning. Parents’ beliefs, targets and attitudes about education have a profound early impact on students’ conceptions in the place of education in their life. ` Children in poverty frequently face challenges at home with school that compromises all their learning (Ceballo and McLoyd, 2002, Evans and British, 2002).

At your home, they might have parents who have do not set high educational standards for them, who will be incapable of browsing to them, and who also do not have enough money to fund educational elements and experience such as literature and journeys to zoos and museums. They might be malnourished and stay in areas where crime and physical violence are a way of life (Santrock, 2004). The property environment is just as important as how are you affected in the institution.

The home factors include: parental involvement in children’s education, how much parents read to young children; how much television children are allowed to enjoy; and how generally students transform schools. Phillips (1998) also found that parent education and social economical status have an effect on students’ achievement. College students with father and mother who were the two educated were known to achieve with the highest amounts. Income and family size were moderately related to success (Ferguson, 1991).

Thus in the analysis of academic achievement, home environment (including family income) and educational actions, it can be concluded that home environment and educational actions explained the greatest amount of variance (Peng and Wright, 1994; Kamaruddin, Zainal, Aminuddin and Jusoff, 2009) The performance of secondary college students in science and nonscience themes in NECO, WAEC and JAMB calls for proper research. Student low performance in those subject matter can be tracked back to the effect of their learning environment.

Even though, several scholars have suggested various elements responsible for the poor performance of students, few research have already been dedicated to the correlation among student learning environment equally at school and home and academic achievement of students. Therefore, this research addressed these learning environment factors that hinder college student from doing better in integrated technology. The main reason for this study is to research the effect of learning environment on extra school college student academic functionality in integrated science. Particularly, the study can; Examine 1 . How do extra school learners perceive the quality of learning environment in relation to their particular academic functionality?

2 . How can secondary school students see teachers’ educating methods pertaining to their academic performance? several. How do secondary school students perceive father and mother economic status in relation to all their academic performance? 1: Just how can secondary institution students understand the quality of learning environment with regards to their academics performance? Ho 2: Just how can secondary school students perceive teachers’ educating methods pertaining to their academics performance?

Ho 3: there is not any significant difference among class size and college student academic efficiency in built-in science?