40076931

Class: UTAS5 Name: Wu Yiwen Pupil ID: 1191415 Case study: The great trap Question 1: Do you consider there is a conundrum between what employers want in staff (agreeable employees) and what employees really do best (disagreeable employees)? For what reason or really want to? Agreeableness is one of the Big Five personality versions. This sizing refers to could be propensity to defer to others. Agreeable people are better enjoyed than foul people, which in turn explain for what reason they tend to perform better in interpersonally focused jobs including customer service.

Compared to unpleasant people, gratifying people can get better along with other folks. They are also even more compliant and make fewer mistakes. Nevertheless , agreeable workers tend to have reduced of career success. When compared to disagreeable persons, agreeable people are practically regarded as bad arbitrator peacemaker. They are fewer aggressive in negotiating starting salaries pay raises for themselves. They are poor in business administration and therefore are harder to become promoted. Rather, the disagreeable employees are usually more ambitious and perform better.

Therefore , there is a contradiction between what companies want in employees and what employees actually do finest. Question two: Often , the consequence of personality depend on the situation. Is it possible to think of some job situations in which agreeableness is an important virtue? And when it truly is harmful? The apparent conundrum implies that agreeableness has equally benefits and harms to the career development of those who individual this trait. When speaking about the sociable relationships, the agreeableness is an important virtue.

You will need to get well along with the acquaintances, superiors and juniors, that the agreeable individuals have an advantage from this aspect. Additionally , they are compliant and rule-abiding. On the other hand, agreeableness sometimes prevents the development of career. Those who are acceptable lack of goal and courage. They are poor at competing with others. It is hard to stand out and become promoted. In addition , management is likewise their weak point. It is difficult to ascertain credibility. They could give very little criticism towards the juniors.

In a word, it is still controversial if employee needs to be agreeable at work because the affects of personality vary in accordant in order to situations. In case the employees can balance the pros and cons and put the agreeableness inside the suitable scenario, they will become successful. Question three or more: In some exploration, the unwanted side effects of agreeableness on income are better for men than for women. Why do you think this may be the case? In some analysis, being acceptable hurt men’s earnings much more than women’s.

Usually, agreeableness is definitely reflected even more on women. Most women will be gentle and friendly. Is it doesn’t common impression. So , at work, agreeableness provides fewer results. However , men are strong, enterprising, firmly and helping a family in the common impression. Agreeableness impact on more at work. On the other hand, males are more likely to become promoted than women. Therefore , the negative effects of agreeableness on profits are better for men than for women.