33055012

In the 20th century women and children encountered many injustices across the United states of america. Many proponents of the could suffrage were advocates of child labor limitations. Florence Kelley, an driven reformer and social staff member, delivered a speech for the Notional American Women Suffrage Association in Philadelphia about July 22, 1905 in order to galvanize other folks to make within woman’s legal rights and kid labor laws and regulations.

Kelley purposefully appeals to emotions of her audience with the use of imagery and utilized parallel thought structure in order to present her tips more conspicuously with the aid of virtually elements.

Kelley uses mental appeal in her conversation in order to further more gain the interest of her audience by manipulating the audience’s emotions to kinds Kelley feels will get her point across the best. She starts off her speech by using a part of data that evokes strong emotion. Inside the first passage Kelley declares that “two million people under the regarding sixteen years are working. Your woman then should go further to state the nasty jobs the kids are doing just like working in cotton-mills and coal-breakers.

She starts off with this emotional bit of data in order that she can easily immediately find the attention of her market. Once the interest of her audience is gained she freely discusses her wants for the change in regulation but the lady constantly shows back to mental appeal through the use of imagery through her presentation in order to keep the audience’s focus. Another point the lady uses it really is when your woman describes the treat of little half a dozen or seven year old women in Atlanta.

Since at this time in time Atlanta had no child labor laws Kelley uses the possible scenario of a little six or seven yr old girl in Georgia which is just capable of reach the bobbins operating eleven several hours a day to produce the feelings of sadness to bring the attention of her audience with her. She after that immediately says “and they may do so tonight while we sleep talking about the girls in her situation to make the audience feel sadder about the situation and bringing the audience’s even attention even more to her.

By simply getting the Audience sad through the use of imagery and drawing all of them into her argument Kelley is able to bring her disagreement to the market. Kelley as well uses literary devices produce her key points in her argument seem to be stronger to the audience. Kelley conveys her key points through her talk with the use of parallelism. She repeats the same notion of the unfair child labor laws in four sentences to emphasize the actual of the unfair laws. Your woman uses the similar abor laws in Alabama, Atlanta, New Jersey and Pennsylvania to repeat the concepts throughout these 4 paragraphs of her speech and to make sure her viewers understands the value of the unfair laws kid labor laws in her argument. The moment describing these laws your woman uses literary elements to aid her assert. For example she uses the implied positivity (the connotation) of the phrase “privilege to create a sarcastic declaration that contains a paraxial set of words to back up the unfairness of the child labor rules set in New Jersey.

Kelley performs this when the girl states “boys and women, after all their 14th birthday, enjoy the pitiful privilege of working for hours long. The girl then connections the audience into the argument of kid labor by finally tying the ideas of can certainly suffrage into her controversy after the girl vividly details the unfairness of child labor laws through imagery, and literary components. Kelley also uses a parallel thought composition when talking about women’s rights and how the enfranchisement of ladies could treat the child labor issues in the United States.

She begins the repeated ideas in women’s freedom with a two rhetorical questions that gets the audience even further fascinated in what she is going to say next. In sum, she requires the audience if perhaps women and instructors in Atlanta could vote, would generally there still be unjust child labor laws. Your woman then asks if ladies in Nj-new jersey could political election would the check that empowered girls 16 and up to work through the night have been approved. Of course as a result of bias of her audience most of the audience would have been thinking at this moment the answer to the people questions are no.

Kelley subconciously at this point stated the women could vote child labor would not become because an issue. The girl wants the group to think this kind of because it after that alludes to her next point that agrees with the bias of most with the people in the room, enfranchise of women being a solution to child labor issues. Kelley then says before the freedom of girls, all ladies in the “great industrial states will have unfree consciences and all people in the room will need to feel they must participate in this kind of beneficial alter.

Towards the end of her speech she repeats the idea, due to her parallel although structure, again but even more clearly that with the flexibility of women, women will be able to take the place of children in the factories to lower child labor. In total, through her speech Kelley is able to successfully use unsupported claims to persuade her target audience in her claim of both the unfairness of child labor laws and exactly how the enfranchisement of women will help correct the issue.