26788155

You go through ‘Advantages and Disadvantages of Automatic Surgery’ in category ‘Essay examples’? Computer Motion, Inc. of Santa Barbara, CA. This business used financing provided by the US Army to formulate the Computerized Endoscopic System for Optimal Positioning (AESOP), a robotic arm regulated by the surgeon words commands to manipulate an endoscopic camera. Shortly after AESOP was promoted, Integrated Surgical Systems (now Intuitive Surgical) of Huge batch View, CALIFORNIA, licensed the SRI Green Telepresence Medical procedures system. This method underwent extensive redesign and was reintroduced as the Da Vinci (one of the world most employed surgical assisted device today.? One full year later Laptop Motion put the Zeus system into productionRobotic medical procedures today offers certainly made a considerable improvement. The surgical treatment is similar to mainly because it was first created but more advanced in terms of the various procedures that robots can assist with.

The product as we know this today comes with cameras and enhanced enhancements, to allow doctors the option of having inside the physique through tiny incisions and reparing which ever is necessary to become repared. The surgical procedure i underwent traditionally is done with a surgeon producing an eight to ten inch slice at the bottom of my belly (very exactly like the cut a woman gets when delivering a baby). I had been hospitalized for 3 days and was given soreness medication 24 / 7. Dr .

Thad Denehy, MD (my surgeon) advised myself that Automated programs in the field of surgical procedure have dramatically changed the method and that my greatest advantage to having the Robotic Surgical treatment was less pain, much less bleeding and fewer scaring. Since the machine uses cameras and enhanced enhancements, doctors generate smaller rainure. The De uma Vinci and Zeus program each use “arms to operate. To ensure these arms to get inside the body and work, the robot only takes a one centimeter incision to match each equip. For my personal procedure it will have essential three tiny incisions on my abdomen.

The cut would have been about one centimeter in length (a very little less than a 50 % of an inch) to fit the arms from the robot instead of a 20 in . cut (about 8 inches) at the bottom of my belly. According to Dr . Denehy the advantage to using the robotic assist surgical procedure would have recently been that I would acquire smaller reduces the smaller reduces. He discussed that more compact cuts are better as a large incision would need more time to heal. One more potential superb advantage from obtaining the robot assist surgery Doctor Denhey discussed would be fewer blood loss.

This may be good for patients who will be anemic (low blood count) or for people with medical conditions that cause them to bleed easily. In my case I am anemic and so i would take advantage of this procedure. With less blood loss and more compact incisions the the Doctor went on to advise me that would be less than 50 % the recovery time of standard surgery. Two weeks to complete recovery instead of eight several weeks to full recovery. This might be a deciding factor for many people. a person who have no the luxury to stay out of work for more than eight several weeks would be returning to work in many cases as early as 1 week.

According to Dr . Denehy the larger the cut a lot more trauma this cause to a persons body system and the likelihood of getting a contamination is substantial. Though Doctor Denehyy had such wonderful things to claim about Automatic surgery My spouse and i still wast convinced. One particular major downside for me was your amount of experience he had with making use of the Robot assist device. He previously only performed 32 surgical procedures using this machine while with the conventional surgery he had performed over 2150. I was extremely concerned about his experience level with this kind of machine. This surgeon was recommended in my opinion by two other doctors. According to Dr .

Wai (One of my frequent gynecologist) within my exam (before going to discover Dr . Denhey) Dr . Denhey was the ideal surgeon in her judgment to remove my personal tumor. I had been very freigtened that the finest qualified doctor for the job only would this procedure 32 times with all the robot that offered numerous promises. During my research I learned that seeing that robotic surgical procedure is a new technology its uses and efficacy have not but been well established (Anthony R. Lanfranco, BAS, Andres E. Castellanos, MD, Jaydev G. Desai, PhD, * Bill C. Meyers, MD (2011). I talked with two surgions fresh in the field (Dr.

Steven Choe, MD and Dr . Poovendran, Saththasivam, MARYLAND. to see if maybe Dr . Denehy experience level was due to him becoming an older surgeon. I was very surprised to understand that both equally new doctors had hardly ever used this equipment. I used to be told simply by both medical professionals that it was not mandatory to find out how to use the equipment but considering that the hospital experienced just acquired the machine they were both gonna get training for using this equipment. Surgeons start their occupations without studying the software initially. Not necessarily mandatory so they can learn how to make use of the machine. This kind of made me think about another disadvantage.

What would happen if the surgeon performing the surgery become ill and need assistance. Who would begin and support him together with the procedure? If all surgions arnt about the same page with knowing how to work with the machine I am not sure in the event that this medical procedures is a gain at all. Being a patient I would be the majority of confident realizing that if something should go wrong during the procedure with the well being of my personal doctor one more physicial in the vicinity of the hospital can be ready and capable of jumping in and completing the method. According to Dr . many surgions nonetheless lack the skills of working with the medical robot.

One other disadvantage is that to date, most of the studies which have been done for the medical robots continues to be of functionality of the tools. The research workers of the technology haven’t done any followup studies as of yet on a long lasting period. In leart thatwas what my surgeon advised me during my consutation. I also found that many procedures performed while using robotic medical device will also soon be redesigned to optimize the utilization of robotic arms and boost efficiency. This can be great for someone looking to have a procedure done in the future but not so great for a patient waiting to possess a procedure carried out today.

Many of the disadvantages seem to be projects which could all disappear with time and experience it see most likely that many disadvantages be cured in the future( Anthony Ur. Lanfranco, BREF, Andres Electronic. Castellanos, MARYLAND, Jaydev G. Desai, PhD, * Bill C. Meyers, MD 2011) It became clear to me that though this technology give many positive aspects there are some cons that really issues me. One of these being that because this equipment takes a surgeon to move the tools while watching a monitor potentially a lot may go wrong.

Software assist surgeries requires the surgeon to advance in the contrary direction from the target within the monitor. If the surgeon turns into tired and forgets that he is being moving in the opposite direction he or she can cause key damages. In order for this to work properly it require a lot of hand eye skill and great hand and finger dexterity. The idea that this action is done throughout the eyes and fingers of a human being, business lead me to trust that this kind of procedure is usually not safety proof.

Perhaps even more important compared to the probability of the fault is definitely the ability to identify that a mistake has without a doubt occurred preventing hazards caused by it, that is certainly, allow the software to “fail safely”. This often involves turning the automatic robot down and removing that from the affected person, and obtaining the operation physically completed with a surgeon. As the task that this robot undertakes becomes increasingly more complicated, there exists an increasing need for more complex hardware and software components (faster response, better accuracy, more degrees of freedom).

This boosts the probability of error significantly. Software is infamously difficult to explanation about, although hardware trustworthiness never ceases to be of prime importance. CONCLUSIONS Robotic surgery is usually rapidly moving into the advancement of surgical treatments as we know it today. Although technology is fairly new really becoming the decision for surgery for equally surgeon and patients. Many individuals still think that they need time for you to completely trust theses equipment and may possibly consider it in a few more years.

With the further use of this machine the pros will more than likely surpass the disadvantages. The more surgeons use this machine they will are more familiar with the several capabilities of Robotic Surgical devices. They will figure out techniques getter better trained and obtaining a lot of practice making use of the equipment. Even more studies will be done around the feasibility with the technology. Standard Surgical methods took many years to develop to where it really is today adding this new dimension to it will further grow and make better the many procedures.

People just like myself will need a second take a look at having the automatic robot assist in with surgical procedures that involve personally and will probably be more excited about having to get small incisions and reduced restoration time for after surgery. Recommendations Brown School. (1999). Automatic surgery. Retrieved from http://biomed. brown. edu/Courses/BI108/BI108_2005_Groups/04/ Long, Big t. (2007, January 25). The robot cometh. Retrieved via http://www. wired. com/science/discoveries/news/2007/01/72500 Parmar, A. (2001). STRESS-FREE SURGICAL PROCEDURE. Siliconindia, 5(10), 44. Interview with Dr . Denehy

Interview withFirst 12 months surgical citizen at heureux peters University Hospital Steven Choe Interview with first yr sergical citizen Povendran, saththasivam at st peters hospital Websites http://biomed. brown. edu/Courses/BI108/BI108_2008_Groups/group12/Roboticsurgery. html http://www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC1356187/ http://www. onlineschools. org/robotic-surgical-technology/ http://library. thinkquest. org/03oct/00760/ http://www. medscape. com/viewarticle/466691_5 Anthony R. Lanfranco, BAS, Andres E. Castellanos, MD, Jaydev P. Desai, PhD, * William C. Meyers, MARYLAND SUMMARY