14328214

Process, Disadvantage

“Explain benefits and drawbacks of the technique of amending the constitution” 15 marks There technique of amending america constitution is actually a long process with lots of checks and balances made by the beginning fathers, this was to limit radical and frequent changes. The first part of the process is suggesting an variation this can be done in two ways, firstly by having two-thirds of both houses of the United Says Congress agree towards the proposal, or by a national convention assembled on the request of the legislatures of at least two-thirds of the states agreeing for the proposal.

To have a proposed variation become section of the US metabolism the proposed amendment needs to ratified, by having either? from the states (38 states) agree to ratify the proposal or by having state ratifying conventions in? of the claims, however this method has only been used once.

One advantage of the process of amending the constitution is that it protects the constitution via frequent change to do with popular thoughts and opinions, it means that to amend the cosmetic the change has to be sensible and required at not something that must be taken lightly, this can be shown by fact that the constitution offers only recently been amended twenty-seven times which usually shows modify is possible but not too easy that it improvements the traditional values that America was built after, helps control one party controlling electric power.

This is a benefit as it ensures that when a party comes into electricity (e. g. republicans) they can not go and make a lot of amendments that benefit them or are in their opinion, since the house of representatives generally as around 50/50 his party democrats percentage and you will need 2/3 to get a proposal approved. The system is democratic because 38/50 need to agree this means its reasonable and reduces the chance of lots of unneeded changes.

A single Disadvantage would be that the process is time consuming meaning if an modification is popular with the general public e. g. banning weapons due to elevated gun offense then it could possibly be rejected by republicans this means it a no, however this was the point when the constitution was created, and was purposely made difficult to amend. However some could argue that it can so hard to amend that it cannot approach with the modern times freely.

One other disadvantage is that because of the issues of amending the constitution it has resulted in the great court presuming the part, this is when the supreme the courtroom rules on a case that something is out of constitute which means that community governments may decide if to enforce their decisions. In an extreme case if amendment proposals are regularly being declined then a fresh constitution may possibly branch off to create these kinds of new changes in a separate constitution getting rid of the existing 1.

In conclusion the amending the constitution is known as a long and tedious 1 but it makes sure that an change has to be supported by a large percentage and something that should be taken seriously, therefore there is not lots of amendments which may jeopardise the historic beliefs of the American constitution, and in addition make the land less steady as there exists constant change which could confuse people. Last but not least the process of amending the metabolism is confusing and annoying but without it America could be altered radically very quickly.