Subway opened in 1965 essay

  • Category: Business
  • Words: 1516
  • Published: 04.01.20
  • Views: 637
Download This Paper

Publicly Traded Company, Environmental Footprint, Durability, Cost Advantage Analysis

Research from Essay:

Part a few: On the Subway. com site, Subway highlights some of its sustainability initiatives. The company works together Energy Star to reduce the vitality usage of their stores by utilizing more efficient light bulbs. The company performs this in partnership with Philips, the manufacturer of the light bulbs.

Subway has a new store principle known as the eco-store. The first Subway eco-store opened in Kissimmee, Sarasota in 3 years ago and two more are open in Oregon. The eco-store is made according to standards set by the U. S. Green Building Authorities, including Leadership in Strength and Environmental Design (LEED) certification. Such features of these stores include high efficiency HEATING AND COOLING systems, remote condensing products for refrigeration and ice-making, high efficiency lighting, low flow water fittings and design made from sustainable resources, which include recycled components. While there are only three eco-stores in existence, the corporation is growing more. Eventually, Subway could take the extra stage of featuring financial bonuses for its franchisees to open eco-stores, as currently most are selecting not to.

Subway also has endeavours to address waste materials in its source chain. The corporation has worked using its main logistics supplier IPC to reduce the quantity of stages that goods pass through on their method from the merchant to the Subway restaurant. By reducing items handling, the carbon impact of the procedure is decreased as is time spent in inventory, that means less space is required (SCB, 2011). This is particularly important via an environmental perspective when contemplating the amount of Subway’s inputs which have been either frozen or refrigerated. According to the Subway. com website, this initiative has kept 1 . 7 million gallons of gas per year and 10, 491 truckloads every year. This also saves Subway money – with monetary motivation the corporation can engage in sustainability methods to the mutual benefit of the planet earth and the company’s ownership group. In addition , Subway works to make sure that all of the delivery trucks are complete, further making the most of efficiency in the distribution process and removing waste (Subway. com, 2011).

As one of the planet’s largest take out chains, Subway inevitably creates a lot of waste. One of many company’s sustainability goals is always to reduce the amount of spend that it creates. The company methods the issue of waste materials reduction on the product-by-product basis. Napkins are made of 100% reused materials, conserving an estimated 147, 000 woods annually. Subway made changes to the elements used for the plastic cutlery, saving 610, 000 pounds of resins annually – the equivalent of 13, 000 barrels of oil. The company has additionally made advancements in several additional product areas (Subway. com, 2011).

One of many benchmarks pertaining to environmental management in a firm is ISO 14000 documentation. Subway has not sought this kind of, and to do this would be a confuse process since it would require the engagement of the eleven, 000 dispenses as well. Subway has not gained any main awards because of its environmental initiatives either. This kind of perhaps signifies that the firm is more of a follower regarding sustainable practice than a leader.

Part 5: The benchmarks for the fast food industry with respect to sustainability are quite low. McDonald’s, for example , offers two eco-stores, a spend diversion plan, some reused packaging and has become more environmentally friendly in its sourcing of meat, coffee and seafood. A few other chains have also introduce eco-stores or comparable initiatives, which include Dairy Queen, although non-e of these stores has very many of this kind of stores (Fields, 2009). Just like Subway, McDonald’s has aimed at its supply chain, and again largely because improving efficiency presently there also helps the results. Leadership in the industry comes from slight chains including Le Soreness and French fries Fusion (King, 2010). This kind of small organizations do not have the same challenges since massive global chains, possess, however. Within its peer group, Subway’s performance is definitely decent, walking both B and Starbucks but very well ahead of the majority of chains (Greenopia, 2010). Subway’s initiatives perform, however , cover most of the important categories, but not all. The organization does not make the effort in organic and natural food, nevertheless , and its overall performance with respect to energy, waste and water projects in the U. S. generally lags the industry leaders. Moreover, Subway does not publish a sustainability record, which makes it tougher to track you can actually performance. There are indications that Subway have not made lots of improvements in past times couple of years (Ibid).

Part 5: The effectiveness of Subway’s sustainability program can be assessed according to a number of standards. In terms of monetary outputs, Subway’s efforts so far appear to have performed very well. While this cannot be affirmed, increased efficiency typically causes cost savings. You’re able to send brand popularity has also superior slightly due to its initiatives, particularly inside the Greenopia review. In terms of community engagement, Subway’s performance would need to be considered fragile – you can actually efforts are inner and not very well publicized.

You will find few costs associated with not being more sustainable. The most important reason would be that the bar is defined very low pertaining to fast food organizations – few do anything with respect to sustainability thus any efforts is seen as positive. The sector has very little to fear coming from regulation, therefore it has to personal incentive to pursue durability, and the buyers generally will not care either, at least when making buy decisions. High is space for improvement – reducing energy costs for example – Subway provides taken a few baby methods – nevertheless ultimately leaves the final decision to the franchisees.

Part 6/7: With couple of consequences pertaining to failing to get more eco friendly, it is not astonishing that Subway performs reasonably poorly regarding sustainability. Naturally, it beats most of the industry colleagues, as the industry as a whole is horrible for sustainability (Kamp, 2008). Subway might perform well in the industry, although there is tiny positive to say of clearing a hurdle that low. A lot of the company’s efforts thus far have come from a desire to lower costs rather than being sustainable. You will discover, however , some things that Subway can carry out relatively easily and quickly to improve sustainability.

The first is to publish a sustainability report. This could give the open public a better feeling of the provider’s performance. Additionally , it would provide a benchmark for the company to work with. The second suggestion is that Subway can begin to locate more moral suppliers due to the list of desired vendors, or pressure its vendors in to providing even more recycled and organic products. The company has the bargaining power to try this, and should take full advantage of that. In addition , Subway will need to push further with respect to energy and drinking water efficiency, and with squander management. Finding a way that its workers do not have to make use of a new set of plastic safety gloves for every hoagie would be a great place to start. Applying more natural light in the stores, and eliminating foodstuff waste might lower costs for franchise owners as well as improve the company’s durability. Most importantly, Subway should focus on changing it is culture regarding sustainability. The business does not seem to be concerned with the matter, and that trickles through to it is franchisees, causing the quite limited action that we find.

Works Reported:

Fields, K. (2009). A brand new order. Eco-Structure. Retrieved May possibly 3, 2011 from http://www.eco-structure.com/retail-projects/a-new-order.aspx

Friedman, Meters. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to maximize profits. Ny Times Magazine. Retrieved May3, 2011 coming from http://www.colorado.edu/studentgroups/libertarians/issues/friedman-soc-resp-business.html

Greenopia. (2010). Fast food. Greenopia. Recovered May several, 2011 by http://www.greenopia.com/usa/fastfood_search.aspx?category=FastfoodListpage=0input=Name%25or%25productsubcategory=Nonesort=ratingdesc

Kamp, J. (2008). Can fast food be sustainable? Ode Mag. Retrieved May possibly 3, 2011 from http://www.odemagazine.com/doc/52/can-fast-food-be-sustainable/

King, B. (2010). Greenopia ranks environmentally friendly fast food. Reuters. Retrieved May well 3, 2011 from http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/21/idUS354293878820110321

QuickMBA. com. (2010). PEST analysis. QuickMBA. com. Recovered May 3, 2011 via http://www.quickmba.com/strategy/pest/

SCB. (2011). IPC streamlines the supply chain for the Subway restaurant string. Supply Cycle Brain. Retrieved May three or more, 2011 via http://www.supplychainbrain.com/content/nc/industry-verticals/food-beverage/single-article-page/article/ipc-streamlines-the-supply-chain-for-the-subway-restaurant-chain/

Subway. com, different pages (2011). Retrieved May possibly 2, 2011 from http://www.subway.com/subwayroot/AboutSubway/history/subwayHistory.aspx

The Economist. (2010). Very good and hungry. The Economist. Retrieved May possibly 3, 2011 from http://www.economist.com/node/16380043

Need writing help?

We can write an essay on your own custom topics!