Structural and thematic review of martin scorsese

  • People,
  • Words: 1598
  • Published: 04.09.20
  • Views: 227
  • Download now

Money, Book Review, Acting professional, Theme

Excerpt from Term Paper:

Structural and Thematic Review of Martin Scorsese’s “The Color of Money”

American Cinema provides succeeded in depicting the realities of present-day America. Martin Scorsese is one such director who may have managed the job in his slow burn style. This daily news is a review of 1 of his works, The colour of Money with this perspective.


The Color of Money was released in 1986 by Touchstone Studio (On Location, 2002). It was aimed by Martin Scorsese with Michael Ballhaus as the cinematographer. The main cast showcased Paul Newman, Tom Luxury cruise and Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio who performed the three greatest characters about which the storyline and the themes of the film are built. Lasting for one hour and fifty-eight minutes, The colour of Money is dependent on the book written by Walter Tevis and it is associated with The Hustler of 1961 to which it is believed to be a sequel (The Color of Cash: Paul Newman, 2002). This kind of film is one of the genre of drama with a tinge of historic genre. The Color involving is recognized to be a typical Scorsese’s film conducted in his slow burn seventies style on which his film Taxi Driver too is designed. The film won an Oscar Award for professional Paul Newman who enjoyed the character of Fast Eddie Felson and was basically nominated pertaining to an Oscar in the first version entitled The Hustler. The film was shot in Chicago, il, Illinois and Atlantic Town (New Jersey) for some Boardwalk and online casino exteriors. Earlier narration in the film was written in the overseer Scorsese’s personal voice. In addition, Tom Sail learned and played all of the required strategy shots besides one which was instead performed by the specialist Mike Sigel who along with other pool players of that time provided assistance to the cast of the film.


Colour of Money can be centered on processes involved and its particular underlying styles in the underworld of pool area games and pool sharking. This underworld is represented by 3 characters specifically Eddie Felson, Vincent Lauria and Carmen played simply by Paul Newman, Tom Sail and Mary Elizabeth respectively. Fast Eddie Felson performs a club owner who had been banned by playing pool area on account of his extraordinary prowess at pool playing. After the best pool player, this individual has turned into a pool shark and is also on the lookout for a protege with just raw talent who he can teach for the professional pool circuit. While on a search, Felson updates Lauria at a pool area hall who may be fleecing a professional pool hustler by conquering him by his individual game using just the innate ability. Requiring these exact traits, Felson convinces Lauria to partner with him by impressive the deal by which he would inform and educate Lauria in the trickery thus necessary to pool shots in return of posting the funds won resulting from professional playing. Carmen performs Lauria’s sweetheart whose position is very substantive both for the plot and the underlying themes. She offers where Lauria lacks; the cunning necessary to make this big. Carmen is the person who gives Felson a hard time whilst he assures Lauria to partner. Nevertheless , once the trio has struck the deal, they will plan and train to get the 9-ball Tournament in Atlantic Town. Through an operating chemistry that asserts the group characteristics between the 3 characters, the film goes towards the orgasm where Felson has skilled Lauria towards the point of regret. Lauria is not really willing to certainly be a student and Felson can be not willing to be a mentor because of respective personality traits. Felson and Lauria shift to the competing ends where the past has vowed to enhance his pool practice to match and compete with Lauria’s genius and talent. The film ends in the massive between the two characters in semifinals in Vegas.


The Color of Money was Scorsese’s first true box-office hit” (Biography, 2002) when it was released and processed through security throughout the United States. However , the film would not go down very well with the authorities who held comparing it with the previously version specifically The Hustler. The essential reception which the Color of Cash received got one critique voiced repeatedly. The plot and its delivery with particular emphasis to the ending, used to be lifeless, flat and lacking over whelming display presence with the Hustler. Most of the critics contended that The Color of Money was not a deserving sequel for the Hustler yet that it was simply a haphazard remake. The experts were nevertheless pleased with the acting in the entire ensemble (“the ensemble is brilliant” (Keogh, 2002) but lamented the a shortage of George Scott who had seriously brought the glow to The Hustler. Exactly where Newman was considered worthy of the Oscar, “few can fault Paul Newman’s Oscar win to get The Color involving (it was certainly about time! )” (Erickson, 2002) and “Newman gained a earned Oscar intended for his performance” (Keogh, 2002); Cruise was also lauded for his performance. “Mention should be manufactured from Tom Cruise’s performance, which is every bit while accomplished because Newman’s. One of these days, Sail is going to make an image in which the crucial attention will not be concentrated about some attention-getting heavyweight just like Newman, Hoffman or Nicholson, and it will always be Cruise who walks throughout the aisle about Oscar night” (Erickson, 2002). In retrospection, it seems that it had been Cruise’s initial breakthrough inside the context on this particular film genre. Nevertheless , Martin Scorsese was belittled for the ornate path of the film, which was viewed in immediate contrast of the “austere” treatment of The Hustler. “One quick scene can be shot from your point-of-view in the cue ball! “(Erickson, 2002) and “Scorsese and cinematographer Michael Ballhaus make an ornate show of the collision and flight of pool balls through space” (Keogh, 2002). Moreover, the film was seen as anti-climatic with the second half reduced to absolutely nothing. In the words of Tom Keogh, “the film…[is] weakened in its second half, and rightly so , as anything that was interesting in the first place, vanishes. “


A great exhaustive viewing and reviewing of The Color of Money reveals that the reasonable execution in the themes by director, the brilliant setup of the software by the celebrities and the benefits of the biting one line entwined in the script were by far the most significant and great attributes of the film. This can be proven through a thorough mention of the the software, the enhancing of the shots and the delivery of specific shots contained within the film.

The topics that the movie director has tried to highlight are as varied as the scope from the film. The themes have been executed through all ways available. The tone of the film, the caustic text of the screenplay, the expression depicted by the actors and of course the story of the film, all combine to set the underlying topics the representative wants to communicate. The most noticeable theme is that of cynicism versus na vete. With enormous directorial skills and so considerably the steadiest use of camera, Scorsese brings about the topic through the zooms and the pans. In addition , the actors bring it out in the execution of script since the seasoned character of Felson communicates his program through turned grins. To focus on the idea, the software states, inches… excellence in pool is definitely not good pool. inches This motif is maintained sub-themes which have been spread out through the film. Greed is a single phenomenon applied here to assert the reality in the sugarcoated globe. This is depicted in the landscape when Felson turns down the sexual advancements of Lauria’s girlfriend to get fear that such a development may shake his relationship with Lauria which will he is cultivating because he landscapes him while his ticket to wealth. The director convey the central theme simply by depicting that even romantic relationships are used for attainment of materialistic functions. There is a picture when Felson teaches Carmen to use “that thing” in order to seduce pertaining to fulfillment of ulterior reasons. This is portrayed through out the film throughout the character of Felson who is shown to play every condition to his personal favor intended for the attainment of his goals. To progress his personal vendetta of purchasing wealth through pool sharking, Felson is shown to convince Lauria by providing every encomiable explanation. He tries to reason with Lauria by deceptive him in believing that he is holding himself again by certainly not joining him as a partner. Felson goes toward the degree of applying Carmen as being a ploy.

Furthermore theme is yet another, which the director has brought to our notice. This kind of theme illustrates the fact that appearances will be deceptive. Precisely what is apparent is usually not precisely what is lying underneath. For instance, the character of Lauria projects an aura of cool. Nevertheless , underneath is placed the personality that is been shown to be hopelessly unconfident, jealous, extreme, nervous and naive since the character of Felson identifies him being a “flake. inches The stars have was able to bring out

Need writing help?

We can write an essay on your own custom topics!

Check the Price