Saturday Night at the Birthday Party Essay

Download This Paper Check the price for your custom essay

Hannah asked 13 children to Jason’s birthday outfit party in her home in Kissimmee. The children’s ages went from three to thirteen years old. Mostly everybody came to her home dressed in colorful halloween costumes.

Some were friendly, terrifying or funny, others had been homemade or perhaps store bought. A new married couple appeared around four: 30 evening with their three-year-old son, Matthew, who is the subject of this conventional paper.. His father John was dressed like a tattered bum and his partner Sarah was dressed as being a friendly fairly witch. Very little Matthew that is usually a white, brown hair male was dressed in a dark-colored cat outfit complete with the painted encounter to look like a cat.

This individual also used the reddish nose, crimson cheeks and whiskers. He can tall and thin for his grow older. According to John and Sarah, Matthew’s parents, their particular son is known as a curious son by nature. Mental Deveopment and Stranger Panic Matthew demonstrated a wide range of standard emotions as Kail and Cavanaugh expected. Most experts agree that complex thoughts don’t area until 18 to 24 months of age (Kail and Cavanaugh, 2006, pa.

186). ” Complex emotions require the extra step of reflecting about one’s individual behavior and exactly how one sees it. Matthew moved his big blue eyes as he scanned the busy area filled with wild assortments of costumes that floated about him. Matt did not speak much although his face expressions of wonderment appeared to say what his mouth did not.

Occasionally, his deal with would light up with pleasure and other moments he seemed to be paralyzed by fear. This individual reacted to the hip-hop music by bouncing up and down and clapping his hands. Matt demonstrated “stranger wariness; by the end of the initial year the kid becomes skeptical in the presence of an new adult (Kail and Cavanaugh, 2006, pa. 188). ” He went to his mother and father and hid his face in his mother’s panel when someone approached him to try to participate him within a dance. Until then he appeared to include forgotten regarding his parents.

His ability to explore great quick come back to his parents when scared showed that he had a secure attachment to his mother’s existence (Kail and Cavanaugh, 2006, pa. 177). Temperament I actually myself was dressed while Raggedy Annie. Matthew did not seem to be impressed with or perhaps afraid of my own costume. He showed much interest in a number of the other more outrageous attires i. e.: a Martian with antennas, and a “Bug’s Life” look as well.

Matthew just simply sat and stared by other costumes. He also smiled and laughs for others. When his parents allowed him to move about freely, Matt hesitated and clung to his parents. That did not last for very long. As the night dressed in on, Matthew adjusted to his liberty and ventured away from the protection of his parents.

This behavior may be easily linked to temperment. Nature is a steady style or pattern within a child’s habit (Kail and Cavanaugh, 06\, pa. 93). ” The moment Matthew was initially introduced to his new environment, he looked slow to the adjustment.

He seemed to be digesting new info rather than only reacting to it. His activity level was really low at first. Because time passed, he became more and more comfy in his fresh surroundings and began to interact to it even more favorably. This is certainly evidence of “Slow-To-Warm-Up” temperament in which the child’s actions are initially inhibited and then becomes more like the Easy or Hard temperament types. He would not pay much attention to the folks who were not dressed in costumes.

He did not play or perhaps laugh with them by any means. Rather, he appeared to be more interested in the array of colorful outfits and the behavior that they were engaged in, both laughing and dancing. Psychosocial Development Erikson predicted that by grow older 2 children strive for autonomy, “independence coming from others and control over their own behavior (Kail and Cavanaugh, 2006, pennsylvania. 179). ” Around 6: 00 pm hours it was the perfect time to eat.

Steve and Sarah tried to get Matthew to sit with them so that they could consume together. Matt did not need to take a seat. He began to cry and pull away when his father tried to lift up him up. When they received Matthew to the table, Matthew did not want to have. His father and mother tried anything.

He was as well excited about everything that was going on around him. Obviously Matthew wanted to regulate the thing that was and was not going to happen by exerting his freedom so greatly. He had demostrated his autonomy by resisting, crying, and pulling away. He is almost certainly still experiencing his terrible two years.

He has a strong will power, but it really is short lived. His reaction to some of the various other more scary costumes great need to be in the safety of his parents at that time revealed some uncertainty as to his ability to cope with the unforeseen. Once again, Matthew became uncertain of him self. Erikson might classify this type of behavior because “AUTONOMY versus SHAME & DOUBT”. Intellectual Development Some of the other guests sensing what was going on with Matthew, attemptedto help Steve and Dorothy.

A happy smiling clown went over and used Matthew. The clown acquired him to enjoy some of his hamburger and french fries. A white bunny with a big fuzzy butt pretending to have an fruit carrot gone over to get him and Matthew jeered and enjoyed joyfully. A silly puppet went as well as danced before Matthew. The puppet also got Matthew to eat a little more of his french fries and beverage some of his apple juice.

When the colorful clown and the ridiculous puppet interacted with Matthew he provided to all of them, smiled and laughed with them. They will got him to eat. Then the hungry this halloween came to Matthew and tried to play with him. Matthew cried and pulled away.

A ghost and a Freddy Kruger look equally went to declare hello to Matthew. Matthew cried, swatted his hands at them to leave, garbled away from these people, and started out yelling no-no. Matthew’s anxiety about Freddy discloses the quality of “Appearance as reality” which is feature of the Preoperational stage of cognitive advancement (Kail and Cavanaugh, 06\, pa.

138). During the preoperational stage, magical thinking may be the rule and children have got great difficulty distinguishing between fantasy and reality. In Matthew’s mind he believed the costumes had been real. This individual believed the scary personas wanted to injury him (twisting away, swatting hands, crying out no no).

His patterns was well guided by a wrongly diagnosed belief (Kail and Cavanaugh, 2004, pa. 123). I asked Matthew regarding the clown and the bunny. Matthew stated, “FUNNY, I NEED GO DOWN AND PLAY WITH THEM”.

Matthew was also exhibiting “CONFUSION BETWEEN APPEARANCE AND REALITY”. Matt is probably inside the pre-operational level of creation. Although Matthew’s parents and also he himself were dressed in costumes he still wasn’t able to understand that these types of where basically people clothed as he wonderful parent’s were. Theory of Mind This behavior is common for a pre-operational thinker.

Piaget stated that children commonly believe other folks see the globe – practically and figuratively – exactly as they do. (Kail and Cavanaugh, 2004, pa. 134). Matthew may have seen these types of personas in other adjustments, like television. Based on the animated personas portrayals, as well as the way other folks reacted toward them, his memory provides probably developed a programa toward these characters (fear-bad or friendly-nice). After getting permission by his parents I chatted with Matthew.

I asked him why this individual cried when the pig and ghost tried to play with him? Matthew stated because they are poor. Then I asked if the this halloween and the ghosting had been mean to him.

His response was “SCARRY”. This statement has lead me to trust that Matthew was exercising a “theory of mind” by that attributed motivations towards the other characters (Kail and Cavanaugh, 06\, pa. 123). (Kail and Cavanaugh, 2006, pa.

186) Conclusion: In Matthew’s preoperational thinking, a great object’s overall look tells what the object is absolutely like. Matt is understanding how to assert his wishes also to categorize his likes and dislikes. This individual has a theory of brain which includes advantages of good versus evil.

He showed no emotion towards people who are not in costumes even though these were strangers to him. This individual paid considerably more attention to the folks who were in costumes and perceived these to be the actual were imitating. Matthew recognized between the clown, puppet, bunny, pig, ghost and the “Freddy Kruger” appear alike. He previously and thought of what was secure and the thing that was not safe, regardless of friendly these were to him.

He demonstrated a wide range of emotion and protected attachment to his father and mother.

Need writing help?

We can write an essay on your own custom topics!

Check the Price