Psychoanalytic and Trait Approaches Personality Assessment Essay

I’ve always ascribed personality as being a culmination of environment first, biology second, and qualities, or what my comprehension of them was. I was unaware of Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic approach, or perhaps the correct meaning of the characteristic theory just before beginning this kind of class. The psychoanalytic way of personality describes the roots of personality as being divided in to 3 parts; the id (unconscious), the superego (preconscious) plus the ego (conscious). Each component plays a definite role in memory, response, desire, making decisions, and conscience. With all 3 parts bonding, conflicting, expending psychic energy, and dictating who were.

In contrast the trait theory approach details personality qualities that are stable and are the basis of for what reason individuals to make a move, in certain methods, consistently. The psychoanalytic approach is very subjective and is not really easily assessed whereas the trait way specifically pinpoints and steps the various attributes that make up someone and how that they interact with one another to form a individuality. Freud thought that personalities are created in the early stages of childhood, and are also a series of sexually themed developmental stages.

The first level; birth to roughly 1 . 5 years, is the common stage. At this stage babies are all about their mouths, and their behavior originate from this place. Freud believed that throughout this stage if a negative encounter occurs, and too much of the psychosexual energy is usually expended in this area, then a fixation of clairvoyant energy can occur.

The result could be the development of an oral individuality as an adult. Adults with oral personalities tend to require some type of common fulfillment; often putting their hands for their mouths, they may be smokers, or perhaps may drink too much. The other psychosexually designed developmental level that kids go through, according to Freud, is the anal stage.

This kind of stage, just like the first, can be where behavioral patterns can come up depending on the volume of psychosexual energy which is expended. In this article, children have to learn control over bodily functions and depending on whether or not the experience is definitely positive or negative, just like behavioral patterns come up. Freud believed that a bad experience could cause an adult character that is obsessive, and stubborn.

According to Freud, defense mechanisms exist for the spirit to deal with items it cannot filter from your anxiety developed within the superego and the identity. Displacement can be described as classic example of a security mechanism. Have you ever ever had a poor day at job where nothing you performed would meet your boss?

Wanting to tell your boss away or acting on the worries or emotions would be bad for your job position. Instead of acting on that frustration it remains pent up, through the time you get home by work you explode in your child, or spouse for some insignificant little infraction. Your taking your out and out aggression out on an individual who did not pose a menace to you is usually displacement.

A second defense device is reaction formation. Freud believed that using effect formation permits us to hide the way we feel by simply acting the precise opposite. A good example would be a person who is extremely outspoken about gay and lesbian rights. Freud would have without doubt believed that because this person’s beliefs had been so extreme that this person must be preventing an internal satanic force; maybe this person was struggling with their own magic formula feelings of attraction for the same sex.

Therefore the old pensee “…doth demonstration too much, methinks” (Shakespeare, 1601). A third defense mechanism is definitely Intellectualization. This defense system helps a person to distance themselves by removing the emotional side of the circumstance that enables a person to focus via a frigid intellectual viewpoint. A good example of this may be a partner that passes away and the wife, also a mother does not allow herself to feel or show her discomfort for the sake of the children.

She causes that in the event she shows her soreness the children can feel worse and above all else your woman must protect them so the girl reads, discovers, and focuses on methods to support get them through it. The best Five Element that finest describes my personal personality would be openness. I really do have an active imagination, and am accessible to considering fresh idea’s, and am not happy in an environment that is regimen.

I tend to prosper in turmoil, and enjoy research. The Big Five factor that least identifies me is usually Agreeableness. I actually do consider personally to be a beneficial person, although I volunteer for many businesses, I tend not to be sympathetic or relying. I guess I use some problems categorizing me personally as being one of many ways or the other, or using a specific characteristic over one more because I find that all this so very subjective. I would say the attribute theories greatest align with my persona.

I have some trouble determining with the psychoanalytic personality explanation. The core theories, though some of them appear sensible, do not seem to align using what goes on inside my head. I have been through a few pretty traumatic things in my life, but I actually am aware of all of them. Why?

I am so aware about them, had to feel these people in my head, my expereince of living. What makes me personally so totally different from other people who have been completely able to leave them to an unconscious level? And, is the fact better?

The psychoanalytic approach as seen in the text says that immunity process are believed to provide an instrument pertaining to the mind to be able to isolate what it cannot manage, yet this method does not provide any stable patterns on what makes a single person less capable of deal with some thing than one other. In conclusion, it seems that no one theory easily describes what makes up an individual’s personality and thus far all this appears to be very subjective.