Pride and prejudice 926 words composition

Pride and PrejudicePride and Misjudgment

On take great pride in and bias, which in the opinion

also comes in for sharper criticism by Austen. Support your response by referring

to specific incidents and episodes.

pride n., sixth is v., 1 . high (or too high) judgment

of types own pride, importance, worth, etc . installment payments on your the condition or perhaps feeling

to be proud. 3. a respectable sense of what is as a result of oneself or perhaps ones situation

or persona, self value, self esteem. bias n., v., 1 . an impression

(usually unfavourable), formed beforehand or devoid of knowledge, thought

or reason. 2 . downside resulting from some judgement or perhaps action of another.

a few. the ensuing injury or loss.

I think, pride also comes in for the sharper

critique by Austen. She has decided to personify this kind of trait in numerous

characters in Pride and Prejudice although it is hard to find one persona

who portrays prejudice exclusively, throughout the story. When misjudgment does

occur in this story, Jane Austen has shown it in the hands of a notoriously

proud personality. Because bias is not personified (ie. depicted because

a major attribute flaw) In my opinion that it was to not be the thing

of Anne Austens crisper criticism.

Jane Austen provides depicted take great pride in in her minor

(functional) characters as a method of showing its importance as

a style of this novel. Lady Catherine is one of the key offenders, her

airs, arrogance and pride are fuelled by different characters like Mr Collins

who is place there to satire proud people and their followers. Another

character to notice is Mister Darcy. He can an extremely significant character in

this novel, a major persona, and I think the fact that fact that having been perceived

to obtain been happy at the beginning of the novel by reader, At the

and the community of the shire, and our perception, along with At the

of his character, has changed throughout the book points to Anne Austens

critique of pride and snobbery (insinuating that once pride is done away

with (and along with it, prejudice) a character turns into much more great.

(Note that Lady Catherine does not swing from her proud arrogant position

via beginning to end of the book, this partially to provide a comparison between

the supposed world of one of Mr Darcy at the start of the novel, and his

actions by the end. )

Throughout this novel we are shown the

arrogant and haughty dispositions of the upperclass of this world. (We

are usually shown the exceptions for the rule, namely Mr Bingley and Miss Darcy. )

These people happen to be exceedingly happy with their wonderful fortunes and estates

and as a result of the emphasis at that time upon monetary problems, they are

prejudiced (and dedicate acts of prejudice) towards their monetary, and

social, inferiors. An example of this is the start of the novel

the ball, when ever Mr Darcy snubs Elizabeth Bennet in an act of prejudice.

He refuses to party with her on account of her not being good looking enough

to tempt me. After getting described through the chapter as being the

proudest, the majority of disagreeable person in the world because he would not socialise

(he danced only once with Mrs Hurst and once with Miss Bingley, declined

staying introduced to any other lady, and spent the rest of the evening going for walks

about the room, speaking sometimes to one of his individual party) his refusal

to dance with Elizabeth Bennet is consistent with the rest of his snobbery

and it is logical that he is slighting Elizabeth Bennet because he is usually excessively

happy and does not think that her handsomeness is worthy of his.

Another example of very pleased character performing

prejudice by using an inferior candidate is Miss Bingley and Mr Darcys conspiracy

against Mr Bingley and Miss Bennets courtship and unavoidable marriage.

With each other, Mr Darcy and Miss Bingley determine that Mister Bingley and Jane are

not appropriate and therefore must not be married because Janes background

is certainly not worthy of Mr Bingleys rich, socially good looking estate. First of all

Mr. Darcy influences Bingley to keep Netherfield, after that Miss Bingley fails

to see him of Janes prescence in London (although she knows that it would

be of great curiosity to him. ) It is because of their take great pride in, and their bending

perception of their own, and in this situatio their sibling or friends pride

that influences to believe they would end up being doing the best thing keeping

Jane and Mr. Bingley apart.

Girl Catherines bullyin of At the (at

the final of the novel) in an effort to dissuade her via marrying Darcy

is a result of her feeling that her very own daughter was entitled to Mr. Darcy

more than Elizabeth (who was not worth as much socially or in monetary

value. ) Your woman argues are definitely the shades of Pemberley to be thus polluted? This kind of

is a great act of extreme arrogance coming from her prejudice against Elizabeth.

Girl Catherine, as a result of her pride, believes she actually is more important

than everyone which everyone else should certainly respect and honour these people (in

the case Elizabeth) simply by rejecting a proposal by a man who have she loves and

who loves her. This obscene assumption on Lady Catherines behalf is as

a result of her prejudice on the Bennets because of the lower income

and social position. The prejudice against all of them for these kinds of a reason is usually rooted

in her very own arrogant satisfaction.

In the case of the characteristics pride

and prejudice (two key styles of the novel) I think that pride also comes in

for the sharper critique by Jane Austen. I do believe this because of her personification

of pleasure (in characters like Female Catherine) as well as the fact that the prejudice

which usually does take place in the novel is combined with, if not rooted in pride.

Throughout the incidents spoken on over, prejudice has been demonstrated to be a

consequence of arrogant pride and because it is an underlying emotive in the

prejudiced actions in the characters Personally i think it is more sharply criticised.