Personality examination of landon carter character

A Walk To keep in mind, Erik Erikson, Ego, Personality Analysis

Excerpt from Term Paper:

Personality Evaluation of Landon Carter

Character Analysis: Landon Carter

There are many stages of development, as well as the goal here is to address them using the fictional character Landon Carter by A Walk to Remember (Shankman, 2002). The basic is that heroes in fictional works, as in true to life, can grow and develop through their very own interactions with others. One of the best ways to determine just how much growth a character has completed over the course of the novel or movie is to consider where character began and where he or your woman ended. In addition , how that character acquired from stage A to point W. In his or perhaps her expansion and what took place that allowed the smoothness to move forwards on his or perhaps her journey are also significant. Characters which experts claim not develop throughout the span of a story are usually overlooked simply by those who are seeing or reading that tale, and if that character can be described as main persona it is very very likely that the publication or film will not be well received because of the lack of expansion.

Addressed here will be Landon Carter great character development in the movie. However , not necessarily realistic to merely write about the movie and what Landon do or would not do during his period on screen. Character creation is much more than that. A quick synopsis from the movie will be provided, nevertheless the focus of the paper will probably be on the examination of Landon and his personality development over the course of film production company. In order to evaluate the character’s development effectively, the work of Erik Erikson will also be reviewed. Then, Erikson’s theory of personality to be used to take a careful check out Landon and just how his spirit changes during the period of the film.

A Walk to Remember

In the movie A Walk to not forget (Shankman, 2002), the main male character is usually Landon Carter. He is a popular boy in high school, and has many good friends. He performs a prank and ends up in trouble and facing expulsion at college. Because he does not want to be removed, he agrees to the treatment which is required participation in some school actions. One of those actions is the episode club, where he ends up functioning closely with fellow scholar Jamie Sullivan (Shankman, 2002). He is aware who Jamie is, but are not friends. She is bookish and quiet, and not about the most girls. Landon ends up attempting to learn his lines, and he becomes to Jamie for support. They practice jointly after institution, but it is clear that he is only employing Jamie on her behalf ability to help him master lines to get the perform. Around his friends he ignores her or snacks her coolly (Shankman, 2002). Jamie is a devoted Christian and is under no circumstances rude to anyone, and so she merely allows Landon to treat her as he will certainly around others. She does not hold a grudge, and she is constantly on the allow him to work together with her and learn his lines properly.

The longer he consumes with her the more this individual comes to look after her and realize that those things he principles may not be essential after all. The play is beautiful, and through the course of it Landon falls in love with Jamie (Shankman, 2002). He understands of her wish list and begins to help her do everything that are crucial to her. This individual also finds out that this lady has leukemia and treatments are no longer working. He’s very annoyed, and Jamie tells him she did not want him to know mainly because she wanted to just make use of the time the girl had still left – however she fell in love with Landon. Jamie and Landon get married to and have 1 wonderful summer season together before the leukemia claims her (Shankman, 2002). In honoring Jamie’s memory, Landon makes a thing of himself and begins to do all the things that subject to him, just like Jamie was building until the end.

Erikson’s Theory of Character

Erik Erikson was Neo-Freudian. He researched the phases of advancement, and many persons termed him an “ego psychologist. inch He wished to study persons from birth to loss of life, and see just how development enjoyed out over the complete life-span. That would support him to get a better understanding of people and what mattered to these people during several developmental levels in their lives. Each stage of psychosocial development produced by Erikson is designated by turmoil (Wallerstein Goldberger, 1998). Since the stage is worked through, the conflict will probably be resolved. Quality of the discord, therefore , brings about a successful completing that level of creation and the capacity to move forward to the next stage. Each favorable end result is called a virtue. The study done by Erikson also mentioned that each life-stage challenge had conflict and tension at both ends. A person who was working toward further self improvement had to figure out how to hold both these styles those ends at one time. Once both “ends” were acknowledged and comprehended, the person was able to move on to the next stage (Wallerstein Goldberger, 1998).

Eight periods were present for Erikson: basic trust vs . basic mistrust, autonomy vs . waste, purpose – initiative or guilt, proficiency – sector vs . inferiority, fidelity – identity versus role distress, intimacy or isolation, generativity vs . stagnation, and spirit integrity versus despair (Wallerstein Goldberger, 1998). While all of these stages are made to be traveled through starting at birth and moving into the 65+ age bracket, there are times when people are “held up” in one level of creation for longer than average. In addition , some people possess trouble during certain stages and that can make it tougher for them to begin the next level. In a sense, they can be still holding onto the last level, and right up until they can reconcile the beginning and end of one stage they are not really all set to move on to the next stage.

Examination of Landon Carter

Landon Carter started out his “life” in the film A Walk to Remember as being a popular secondary school student. Very little is known about his years as a child, but he’s estranged via his daddy. The discussion why this estrangement took place can be not a thing with which film production company deals (Shankman, 2002). The most important thing to make note of about Landon early on inside the movie is the fact he is aware he is popular and favorite, and that is fault his lifestyle that is most critical and significant to him. His ego is concerned about who he’s in romance to others, and in the things which he finds valuable. If he decides to try out a bogus, he concentrates on the joy of it and how funny it will be, combined with admiration he may get from his friends for going through with it (Shankman, 2002). He does not consider the issue of might go wrong or perhaps whether anyone could be injure by the prank. That matter is not really something that is generally on the mind of a young boy, but Landon is definitely clearly dedicated to the idea that they can do simply no wrong and that he is above the law.

In looking at that from the viewpoint of Erikson’s stages, Landon is very worried about himself and not so much with others. This individual has not yet let go of the idea that he is untouchable, and he has not but grasped the concept other people will be significant which their feelings and thoughts are certainly just as valid and significant as his individual. Erikson was highly focused on the idea of how a person’s persona is formed. Beginning when they are born and developing all throughout adolescent and adult lifestyle right up until death, a persona was a significant part of life (Wallerstein Goldberger, 1998). In other words, it was unlike other areas of life, where things could possibly be changed and adjusted at will. A character was partly genetic and partly environmental, and that meant that it experienced distinct stages that were common to each person (Wallerstein Goldberger, 1998).

As Landon’s prank backfired and this individual ended up in serious difficulties, he noticed that there were implications for his actions. That required that this individual hold a stage of personality creation at equally ends as he came to conditions with the idea that he was not infallible and that he was also not over a law in any respect. It was a turning point in the life, yet a hesitant turning point because he was disappointed at getting caught and at facing expulsion. For Erikson, the main point would be that phases can only always be left and entered into when a person has turned peace having a stage which is ready to go forward (Wallerstein Goldberger, 1998). Because that is the case, it was fairly clear that Landon was not ready to change and was only moved toward a new stage as they had