People of the express of washington dc v conrad

People, Twice Jeopardy, Superstar, Paramedic

Excerpt from Term Paper:

People of the Express of California v. Conrad Robert Murray

The unconscious manslaughter trial of Michael jordan Jackson’s personal doctor, Conrad Murray, is at the news relatively every day for months. Even though the trial has concluded and the universe knows that Doctor Murray was found responsible, it is important to look at the court proceedings and just how the evidence led the jury to that decision. Dr . Murray administered an excellent drug referred to as propofol – an anesthesia drug that is certainly only said to be used in tightly monitored clinic settings – to Eileen Jackson to help him sleep.

The argument by the prosecution was that Doctor Murray do this despite the fact that he understood the dangers, and administered a lot of drug to Jackson, causing a fatal overdose. At that point, Murray did not act quickly enough in calling the paramedics and did not do enough to save Jackson’s your life. In other words, he was more concerned with trying to cover the fact that he had done something wrong, which wasted precious time he might have been using to preserve Jackson. There was clearly also the care that Murray may have been too cavalier and negligent with monitoring Knutson when propofol was being employed, resulting in Murray not noticing that Knutson had ceased breathing until some mins after this actually happened.

Even though the consensus is already known, this kind of paper was created to predict whether Dr . Murray would have recently been found accountable and sentenced to several years in prison based on the evidence shown and the history of other circumstances that are comparable in mother nature. Based on evidence available against Murray as well as the other situations that were a lot like his, his chances of conformity on the fees he faces are very low. For example , in People v. Broussard (1977), it had been found that involuntary drug trafficking was, innately, a getting rid of that was unintentional. Although Murray likely did not mean to eliminate Michael Knutson, there appears to be enough data that Murray did, in fact , cause Jackson’s death (i. e. Knutson would not possess died in those days and place experienced Murray not really been present).

Of course , even though there is a large body of evidence that appears to point to a guilt ridden verdict within a criminal circumstance, acquittal may be possible. It really is simply very unlikely. Take for example the Casey Anthony circumstance. Despite all the evidence directing toward Ms. Anthony as the guilty get together (or by least one of the guilty parties) in the loss of life of her daughter, the girl walked totally free and had not been found guilt ridden. Many persons believed the lady was responsible, but the proof was not enough and the lady was not found guilty. This could happen with Murray, but that scenario is definitely not the expected stopping.

In their text on felony justice, Neubauer and Fradella (2010) go over acquittal since what takes place when the judge or perhaps the jury make a decision that the accused is not guilty of the crime for which she or he is accused. At that point, the case can be concluded plus the defendant (assuming there are simply no other charges or additional issues pending) is liberated to go. When ever this does not take place, and