Parne o plomo javdani response paper analysis

In her essay, “Plato o Plomo,  Marie Javdani analyzes & contrasts the stories of two boys, who live individually in two countries, to signify their very own indirect relation. The phrase “Plato o Plomo translates to “silver or perhaps lead, meaning that peasants of South America can accept a bribe & live (silver) or take a bullet & die (lead). Eric, an American boy, & Miguel, a Colombian, are both out on the trail on a Thursday night, but their intentions are entirely diverse.

After credit scoring drugs, Joshua whistles although walking down his road to meet plan his good friends for “a bit of entertaining.  Miguel creeps later on in his village, praying the past time in his life; this individual to be killed by the guerillas who have been frightening him & his father. The two reports of the two Eric & Miguel begin to unite while Javdani narrates the cause & effect of America & Republic of colombia, showing just how choices produced in the U.

S. may affect the harsh facts of Colombia’s drug affiliation. By using parallelism in the testimonies of Joshua & Miguel, Javdani determines the elements contributing to large drug activity. “Eric & Miguel symbolize opposite poles in what america government refers to as the ‘war on prescription drugs. ‘ Eric’s drug employ symbolizes the demand of development in Colombia, where Miguel’s village is usually terrorized by the ruling medicine lords & paramilitaries.

The strategy which the writer uses to represent the two Eric & Miguel is cause & effect. This use of parallelism combined with cause & result is meant to emphasize two sides to the political turmoil of drug physical violence in Colombia. Javdani brings up that U. S. money being brought to Colombia can be ineffective in its purpose, to enforce purchase over the large drug activity that rules Colombia. Since Colombia creates a majority of the world’s crack & heroine, the U. S believes that putting an end to the growth of the coca, a plant used for making crack & heroine, can stop the application of drugs in the states. But the huge amounts of aid dollars sent to account, supply, and train Colombian military units have just escalated the violent paramilitaries that support drug cartels. As a result of rebel drug lords having control, Colombians have no choice but to cooperate together with the production of coca prove land. This approach to removing drug activity was certainly not powerful, it is turning into easier to notice that drug trafficking is market-driven; the end to the demand.

1