Identifying fallacious arguments applying critical

Research from Business Plan:

Aspects of Critical Considering

Critical pondering skills have become the focus of an increasing body of research in recent times (Borg Stranahan, 2010), because of in large part to the flood details that is now available and the ought to analyze and interpret this info to identify flawed reasoning (Halpern, 2009; Hummell, 2016). For this end, this kind of paper can be applied all of the 8 steps suggested by the U. S. Army Management Personnel College’s critical thinking style developed by Dr . Ron Paul as displayed by Eichhorn (n. deb. ) to assess selected quarrels made in a memorandum for the board of directors of Penn-Mart with regards to its medical strategy by simply highlighting the fallacies identified by Almossawi (2013) in his book, A great Illustrated Publication of Awful Arguments. Finally, a summary of the research and essential findings regarding the application of essential thinking expertise to identify fallacious reasoning will be presented in the conclusion.

Assessment and Research

According to the definition provided by Cantu (2015), important thinking expertise “involve the active and deliberate using higher-order thinking in order to solve a given issue or presented situation” (p. 4). The eight methods recommended by U. H. Army Managing Staff University that are based on research simply by Dr . Ron Paul are set forth and applied to a memorandum old August 6th, 2016 towards the Penn-Mart plank of administrators from Rescatador Monella, mature vice president of human resources (hereinafter “the Monella memorandum”), who makes many points about the proposed changes to the company health care profit strategies which can be regarded as fallacious, in Table 1 beneath.

Table you

Eight steps to critical considering applied to the Monella memorandum

Step

Description

Application to Monella Nota

Purpose, Aim, or End in View

If we reason, we all reason for some end, to achieve some aim, to satisfy a lot of desire, or fulfill some need. One particular source of concerns in college student reasoning is definitely traceable to defects in the level of target, purpose, or perhaps end. If the goal is definitely unrealistic, for example , or contradictory to different goals trainees has, whether it is confused or perhaps muddled in some manner, the thinking used to attain it is troublesome.

The purpose of the Monella comunicacion was to give board users with a great “update upon our attempts to review and revise Penn-Mart’s healthcare rewards strategy. inch Based on this straightforward affirmation, the purpose of this memorandum can be realistic and unambiguous.

Issue at Concern or Trouble to be Resolved

Whenever we make an attempt to reason something out, there is at least one problem at issue, at least one trouble to be resolved. One area of interest for evaluating student reasoning, therefore , is definitely the formulation from the question to be answered or maybe the problem to become solved, whether with respect to the present student’s own thinking, or to that of others.

The situation of interest addressed by the Monella memorandum issues the growing costs of the organization’s healthcare benefits system. The Monella memorandum, nevertheless , uses a straw man way as explained by Almossawi (2013) since it oversimplifies this issue as reviewed further under.

(Information) The Empirical Sizing of Thinking

Whenever we cause, there is a lot of “stuff, inches some trends about which we are thinking. Any “defect” then inside the experiences, data, evidence, or perhaps raw materials upon which a person’s reasoning relies is a conceivable source of concerns.

The Monella memorandum is definitely flawed simply by “not a cause for a cause” and an “appeal to fear” fallacies Almossawi (2013) by citing “internal research” only signifies that pay and benefits account for about 40% of Penn-Mart’s annual budget and also estimates that these costs is going to consume for least 15% of it is profits simply by 2015; yet , the memorandum is dated 2016 and a realistic calculation should be readily available concerning the genuine correlation among wages and benefits and profits.

Inferences

Reasoning takings by steps in which we all reason as follows: “Because this is certainly so , that also is thus (or most likely so), ” or “Since this, therefore that. inch Any “defect” in this sort of inferences is a possible method to obtain problems within our reasoning

The Monella nota uses “hasty generalizations” Almossawi (2013) to group almost all employees as one of two groups, essentially those who are fit and healthy (the desirables) and those who are not (the undesirables), with no taking into account any other factors. As an example, Monella claims that, “It is not really fair for the young and suit, to allow individuals who are not to become a drag on profits. “

The Conceptual Sizing of Reasoning.

All