Hurricane katrina and the influence book review

Fema, Complacency, Flooding, Delta flight 1921

Excerpt by Book Review:

This is the level that it becomes nearly impossible to avoid the tragedy from spiraling out of control.

When you step back and analyze the specific situation, it is obvious that the insufficient coordination and communication coming from Mayor Nagin made the problem worse. While, he did not heed the warnings regarding: the total numbers of destruction and the possibility the city could be paralyzed using this storm. This caused a ripple effect in the town government, without one being ready for the general scope with the damages plus the possibility the disaster may become worse in the days after the surprise. What is the majority of troubling regarding these events is the fact Nagin; would not accept responsibility for what was happening. Instead, he began accountable others pertaining to his disadvantages and waited for the state of hawaii or federal government to do something special in the issues that they can were facing. Once this occurred, that meant that the general scope of the disaster became even more severe by: leaving tens of thousands of occupants stranded versus providing some form of effective assistance.

The Reaction of the City of Fresh Orleans when compared with the Seacoast Guard and FEMA

When comparing how the City of New Orleans and the FEMA reacted for the crisis, it truly is clear that both choices were unprepared for the disaster. This is due to, the top leadership failed to be familiar with overall severity of these incidents and the result that it could have on the citizens of New Orleans. The position of these two entities made the consequences of the catastrophe even worse. The main reason is due to the fact, that there was clearly a postpone in mailing the necessary methods to those parts that were toughest hit. This made it hard for alleviation organizations to supply any kind materials in these areas and that helped for making response / recovery efforts slow. (Brinkley, 2006, pp. 499 – 540) (Griffin, 2008, pp. 90 – 91)

Nevertheless , the Coastline Guard was one of the simply entities that have been actively conducting effective search and rescue missions in the area. As, their particular leadership started to fill the void that was left in awaken of the a shortage of the response from: FEMA and the town. In this case, they’d personnel performing search and rescue operations of stuck residents. Wherever, they would expels them to areas that they were safe and may be able to use a host of numerous relief materials / companies. The problem is that they had limited amounts of workers and tools. Given the general scope in the situation, meant that any kind of comfort efforts we were holding conducting had been having a minimal effects on addressing the severity from the problem. (Brinkley, 2006, pp. 499 – 540) (Hurricane Katrina, 3 years ago, pp. 80 – 110)

When you compare the responses from the three agencies, it is clear the FEMA and the City of New Orleans were underestimating the total response of what was occurring. This really is based on poor leadership, which caused key personnel to delay any sort of responses. In which, they took a blaming approach of assuming that various other organizations needs to be responsible for coping with the catastrophe. This manufactured the wake of the devastation even worse, which usually led to mayhem and concern. While the Coastline Guard, was taking a positive approach by simply sending in crucial personnel to become part of: the rescue and recovery initiatives. This helped to save lives and reduce the impact of the devastation on the citizens. However , provided the fact that the city and FEMA were somewhat unable to start, meant that they were unable to successfully address each of the challenges they were facing.

Bibliography

Hurricane Katrina. (2007). Buenos aires D. C.: U. H. Government Producing Office.

Brinkley, D. (2006). The Great Deluge. New York, BIG APPLE: Harper Collins.