Globalization the medieval travelogues of ambito

Globalization, Do it yourself Reflection, Sports, North Korea

Excerpt via Essay:

Globalization

The medieval travelogues of Ambito Polo and Ibn Bastonata show how the world is viewed through the lens of the own culture. Polo, the Venetian dealer, emphasizes trade in his information of the place he sessions while Battuta, the Islamic judge, highlights morality in the descriptions of the identical places. This kind of framing is not a fault of either writer, but rather it can lend perspective to our personal view worldwide – many of us see the community through our very own lens. Hence, like our two ancient travelers, we characterize the earth in terms of juxtapositions – what is similar to what we should know and what is different from what we know. In doing so , we make an unnatural division between our culture and everything other civilizations. The differences and similarities establish us. There exists nothing innately wrong with this – the only urgent action is that we always understand that we are guilty of this framework and that we could step back out of this framing to see our positions or those of others with greater objectivity.

Appiah discusses the issue of globalization and its impact on society. As a species, all humans discuss the world as well as finite group of resources, setting up a zero sum game. The globalization has made clear the limits of our globe, and provided access to its resources to one and all. Quickly, this structures globalization being a game of winners and losers. Appiah’s optimism about the human competition being able to come together despite the dissimilarities to solve challenges comes from a collectivist perspective, where all of us recognize that your survival is a common issue for all of us, regardless of cultural framing. We still view the issue as being characterized by multiple cultures which includes “ours” and “the other folks, ” although Appiah argues that maybe such divisions can be set aside when confronted with a need to do so. Polo would agree – where there is usually money to be made he can far less concerned with the religious beliefs or morals of the people with whom this individual trades. This individual still has a moral framework, being Catholic, but his cultural perspective is that once there are bigger things to be accomplished ethnic divisions may be set aside.

Franklin Foer makes the point that divisions developed can be fairly arbitrary, yet ultimately can be useful. The section between Us citizens with respect to soccer relates significantly less to sport than it will to governmental policies, he states. Politics, of course , is about resources. Globalization is likewise about assets, their exploitation and their division. Foer’s point can find corollary in globalization, too: distinct cultures happen to be judged in respect to their readiness to engage in the global program. States which in turn not participate – like North Korea – will be rogue and states which have a