1 . What are the strongest points of the newspaper?
What do you take into account are its main contributions to the field of global people management? The paper itself has a very interesting purpose together with the research query of whether girls leaders happen to be “really” not the same as men leaders. The conventional paper gives a very good intro in particular supplying the books review in order to get familiar with some fundamental knowledge on the topic of gender variations in leadership.
The review emphasis combination of stereotypes and social differences challenges out well a new viewpoint of the issue, which has certainly not been mentioned that extensively in previous research. As well the introduction of the new notion “stereotype threat”, which in turn actually could possibly be viewed as a partly solution for women sometimes performing less well as they possibly can is a fascinating point for management issues in reality. However the strongest parts of the conventional paper are obvious. The introduction of the new concept of 3 paradigms: gender-blind view, gender-conscious view and this perception produces reality are not only the best points of the paper, but in my opinion may also be considered as contributions to the discipline of global persons management.
The brand new paradigms could possibly change the notion of companies, maybe corporations will use the tool from the three paradigms to review their own constructions and be able to improve situations for ladies, giving them more possibilities. 2 . What are the weakest points of the conventional paper? (E. g. What arguments are not sufficiently strong? What is unclear? What is lacking? ) Potential drawbacks happen to be that paradigms are released, but not sufficiently discussed inside.
Also the paper offers good examples wherever they can be located, it could show more proof for existence in addition to summarising and drawing them together coming from old findings. Also the paper will not find a good method how to control diversity also to capture that. It does not control the mix of cost-effective coordination and senility to local cultures. Similarly the paper focuses on simply two organizations, “Fuel” and “Excel”, that happen to be very different in how they “fill” out the paradigms.
In my opinion two firms are generally not enough, more firms should be reviewed for example in a set of questions in order to offer more support for the findings. Correspondingly the daily news does not include a focus on international firms, which is very important to not leave out in times of globalization. The past criticism would be that the paper is not able to answer it’s paper purpose question “what is the true difference among men and women in leadership”. several.
How could the writer make the daily news better? Once writing the literature review the can build up the study papers as well as the gained understanding chronologically rather than going back and forth in the research date ranges. As the paper is usually missing a lot of numbers, the thought of hypothesis could have been used, a greater number of firms questioned in survey design as a quantitative analysis would are present as data for perhaps the problem is present in real world and whether paradigms can be implied in the general managing world. Likewise the point of view of ladies on this topic would be very interesting and more expedient.
How do women perceive the gender distinct initiatives, what would that they like as support? Also the conventional paper as already mentioned should include a spotlight on multinational firms including those in a study.
We can write an essay on your own custom topics!Check the Price