Ft case study essay

That that seemed to really call up my attention as being a is actually some of the earnings ratios. Beginning with the Gross Profit margin, it seems at the moment that Merely Feet makes $41. 62 in 1999 and in 1998 $41. 53 in profit, however it cost the company more to generate than what they are really making in profit. This shows that they should lower their particular costs to make their merchandise to be even more profitable. The company has not actually reached a breakeven point. We as well see that inside the two years of 1998 to 1999 that there was a decrease in profitability a reduction in return of equity.

Therefore the company is usually making much less profit for each dollar that the shareholders have got invested in the corporation. This percentage shows us how efficiently the company is working, and it shows how proficiently management is definitely using the cash that investors have contributed to the company. Thus in doing these kinds of analysisfor Exclusively for Feet Inc. I would end up being questioning the efficiency of management to get handling the income that shareholders have contributed.

I would should also look for tightly at how the organization is making, the cost they can be having can be higher than the money, for that reason we would want to gauge how they may lower cost to help make the profit even more profitable to get the company. Problem 2 .

Exclusively for Feet operated large, high-volume retail stores. Recognize internal control risks common to such a company. How ought to these hazards affect the examine planning decisions for such a client? One of many risks that a large retail store like Exclusively for Feet Inc. could find in internal handles is in the area of Inventory Control. The largest concern is that precisely what is stated for the Financial statements really exist. It is important to gauge this risk so that an organization can see if you have any thieves by personnel and to make sure on it is balance sheet this shows an accurate report of inventory. Another area of risk in a excessive volume store would be the issue of managing cash.

Since there is such a high turnover of cash in a large store, there should be good inner controls in position that will prevent false accounts receivable, and a misrepresentation of profits. Another risk that needs to be assessed is the management operations and just how they manage and break down responsibilities in the location. In retail stores there can be a high yield of people, for this reason management should make sure that you will encounteer the proper label of duties, they must make sure all paperwork can be properly noted and accounted for. As to how it will affect the audit plan, the auditor needs to ensure that there is appropriate division of tasks, needs to check to make sure ideals are correct and there are zero misstatements. The requirement to look carefully at the products on hand, accounting for the proper value on hand and also the proper products in stock. Question a few

Just for foot operated in an extremely competitive industry, or sub-industry. Recognize inherent risk factors common to businesses facing such competitive conditions. Just how should these kinds of risks impact the audit organizing decisions pertaining to such a client? An inherent risk is each time a company is definitely susceptible to a misstatement economic statements. It’s the responsibility of your auditorto carry out audits that will make these risks low to non-existent. Among the this is segregation of duty. IN a very competitive organization profit and larger revenue can identify you as being the ideal, a possible risk is the lack of personnel that keeps expenses low giving people double responsibilities, but creating an inherent risk. If we might not have management putting your signature on off on purchase instructions, and others take into account the product staying received and another accounting for it being sold and one other confirming the completion of the process in the accounting of these kinds of items through monthly closings or these kinds of. An auditor would want to evaluate that administration has the encounter necessary to perform these plans. And those which might be in the stated positions as well would be knowledgeable. If there is a higher turnover in these positions it could be a sign of fraudulent habit because people whom are trustworthy would not stay in a place to accomplish something unethical. All these type of changes must be evaluated by auditor. Issue 4

Make a comprehensive list, in a topic format of the audit risk factors present for the 1998 Exclusively for Feet examine. Identify the five review risk factors that you believe that were most significant to the powerful completion of that audit. Rank these risk factors from least to most important and be prepared to protect your search positions. Briefly describe whether or not you feel that the Deloitte auditors replied appropriately for the five important audit risk factors that you just identified.

The emphasis that management produced on reaching the earnings desired goals at what ever cost. The near season end deals that Exclusively for Feet was engaged in Legislation cash solutions of the organization

The kind of business strategy that the managing of Only for Feet utilized The way which the company usually kept the stock rates on the top quality The increase in inventory at the conclusion of equally years.

The seller confirmations certainly not coming through to confirm transaction by Just to get Feet.

Raise the risk factors which were most significant towards the audits finalization would be the Inherent Risk, control risk, review risk and detection risk. An Auditrisk is for the auditor answers the following inquiries: Is there a risk of fraud? Is this risk linked to the intricacy of deals? Does it incorporate and significant transaction from the normal course of business? Karl M Johnston, (Auditing 2014) states that “whether the chance is related to recent significant economic accounting, or other developments and, it requires specific focus.  Within my ranking of more important to least significant in risk factors I believe that they are generally all essential. Inherent risk are important as it will examine if there has been some type of robbery, or if perhaps there was nearly anything changed in the form of a nonroutine transactions or a complex deal.

Sort of just like what Only for Feet do when brought up the inventory at the end of two years. The Control risk is also of equal importance because it is relates to a misstatement being ceased with inner controls set up. The fact that Just for Toes was permitting misstatements to get written by exterior vendors to send to the auditor shows that deficiency of internal regulates within the Simply for Feet organization allowed this type of poor bogus management to happen. This would be examined through declaration level investigations like: Valuation, existence, demonstration, completeness and rights and obligations disclosures. In my opinion Deloitte did not reply appropriately to risk factors. Though they may have seen the chance factors, though they found the misstatements and inhibited them, they did not action accordingly. If they had the SEC would not have fined all of them. Question a few

Put your self in the position of Jones Shine in such a case. How do you have replied when Don-Allen Ruttenberg asked you to mail a false verification to Deloitte & Touche? Before responding, identify the parties that will be affected by for you to decide?

The people who does have been affected by my decision is the shareholders, others who have worked pertaining to the company, people, management and executives in the company, actually those who were customers of Just for Ft. But also then using those people at risk I would have stated no and risked dropping my task by being terminated. My ethical position to stick to what is correct is what could require me personally to make this decision. To be asked to complete something bogus would make me want to separate myself using this type of administration. At theend I would pay the price for my own bad decision.

REFERENCES

http://www.investinganswers.com/financial-dictionary/financial-statement-analysis/return-equity-roe-916 recovered 10/2/14

http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/how-to-assess-inventory-management-control-risk.html retrieved 10/3/14

http://accounting-simplified.com/audit/introduction/audit-assertions.html recovered 10/5/14

1