Explain How Groups Can Influence People in Positive and Negative ...

Getting part of a group can give an individual a sense of protection, a boost to their particular self-esteem and a feeling of belonging. They may see themselves to be part of an ‘in-group’.

Becoming part of a group that is seen as being better than other folks (an ‘in-group’), can create a relationship between the people. People of different races or perhaps religions, or rival bande, would be known as being the ‘out-group’. The sense of security and bonding while using other people can come via having people around you that are working with you, and knowing that you have somebody looking out for you if and when things fail.

Having persons depending on you in a management role can give boost a great individual’s self confidence. There are many downsides that can include being component to a group as well. Peer pressure and the a sense of having to adjust in ways through which may seem improper, could cause associates to go along with decisions and behaviour made, in order that they fit in though they know the outcomes won’t possibly be the very best ones. The pressure to conform in front of other members of a group was evident in an test carried out by Solomon Asch in the year 1950s. It revealed how people of a group will go along with decisions that others make even though they know that it’s not necessarily the proper choice.

A small group were shown a photo of a line and then asked out of three other lines, what type was the same length. A lot of members of the group deliberately offered the wrong solution. They had recently been influenced by the experimenters. The results revealed that the level of conformity grew when the answers were stated out loud. The degree of conformity lowered when the participants were asked to write down their very own answers in private.

The members (not in on the experiment) clearly felt that they can needed to conform with the remaining portion of the group, if it was since they didn’t want to seem stupid or they simply felt pressured into agreeing and not being the unusual one out. Another sort of how getting part of a group can have got it’s downsides and positives is the history of Dorinne Kondo (1990). She was a Japanese American woman who also, having lived all her life in the us, goes to Asia to study.

Right now there, she remains with a Japanese people family, the Sakamotos. Kondo finds it hard to adapt from the start of her go to and she feels she is getting judged intended for looking Japanese but not behaving in the correct manner or perhaps being able to correctly communicate while she didn’t speak the chinese language. After spending time and helping out together with the family the girl with staying with, Kondo gradually learns the way to do something to suit the Japanese culture.

After she gets praise by Mr Sakamoto himself for greeting him with a bend in the traditional manner and when her educator praises her flawless efficiency at the tea ceremony, Kondo will no doubt have gotten a boost to her self esteem and maybe a connecting with the Japanese people women. The negatives appear to out-weigh the positives during Kondo’s amount of time in Japan although as she struggled with the fact that girls are seen as being below the guys and the need to bow down (literally) to them. Your woman felt obliged to take on the ‘daughter’ position during her stay and a feeling of expert pressure to do as a Japan woman, although it wasn’t automatically the way she’d act in her life in America.

To conclude being within a social group (the males from the Criminals Cave experiment) there looked like there was more advantages as the boys sensed they had other folks on their part and lots of back up when things turned negative. Their self esteem would have been pretty substantial and the relationship between them every would of grown as the time continued. Kondos account, which showed more of a ethnic group, had more negatives as she really believed the pressure to adapt suit her cultural group and establishing.