Consider william blakes presentation of love in

(b) Paying out close focus on language and form, create a critical understanding of the next poem, taking into consideration William Blake’s presentation of affection in the poem ‘The Clod and the Pebble’.

The Clod and the Pebbled

“Love seeketh not by itself to you should

Nor to get itself hath any attention

But for another gives its ease

And builds a Heaven in Hell’s give up hope. 

And so sung slightly Clod of Clay 5

Trodden together with the cattle’s feet

But a Pebble in the brook

Warbled out these kinds of metres fulfill:

“Love seeketh only personal to make sure you

To situation another to its joy, 10

Delights in another’s loss of ease

And forms a Heck in Heaven’s despite.



The ostensible cuteness of the composition The Clod and the Pebble perhaps goggles a more abnormal and deeply cynical evaluation of love by the poet Bill Blake. In the beginning, the comparison between the clod and the pebble’s speeches about love might encourage a good response to the clod’s optimism about how appreciate can save us from even the the majority of hellish position.

The pebble’s pessimism about like, on the other hand, is usually unpleasant and unsettling, yet it’s also a far more accurate expression of the challenging nature worldwide as it is represented in the poem. Blake’s presentation of love, after that, is unklar. While the best that take pleasure in is able to overcome any scenario is attractive, it might not really be a genuine assessment in the context of the world’s rudeness.

Blake’s personification of the clod and the pebbled captures two very different man experiences. Were told the clod can be “trodden while using cattle’s feet.  With all the word “trodden Blake captures the experience of constant hardship, and being consistently downtrodden, subjugated and abused. There is also responsive imagery of weight and pressure from your “cattle’s foot,  limiting the clod and pushing it in a new shape. In this way, the clod is definitely described as nevertheless it experience human struggling. It makes us consider someone who has was required to become flexible to fit the continual hardship of their circumstances ” reflected in the physical properties of any soft clod of clay. It is after that pleasantly surprising that the clod sings regarding love in the most positive way.

On the one hand, the clod’s optimism relating to love is usually deeply admirable, and the seite an seite structure utilized to present this speech along with the pebble’s emphasises that optimism inside the most appealing way. The clod states that love “builds a Heaven in Hell’s give up hope,  while the pebble states that it “builds a Heck in Heaven’s despite.  The clod speaks in the context of a hellish lifestyle that requires pain and suffering, and endows love with the ability to transcend such an experience and create a divine existence of joy and happiness. The pebble, alternatively, speaks from a comparatively beautiful existence and in turn endows take pleasure in with the capacity to corrupt that existence with the pain and suffering advised by the expression “Hell.  Our sense that the clod is very well optimistic five evolves in a feeling that we too need and even think that love can rescue and offer solace for this figure.

More over, the seite an seite structure will also help to emphasise the pebble’s negativity. The clod declares that “love seeketh not alone,  as the pebble answers that “love seeketh just self.  The keyword phrases “not itself and “only self build a clear rapport here in the two opinions of love. The first highlights it while essentially non selfish, while the additional underscores it as definitely and solely selfish. In addition, while the clod sings gladly about how love “for another gives the ease the pebble responds with how love “joys in another’s loss of ease.  The clod’s phrases suggest a task of ready self-sacrifice, as the pebble’s phrases suggest a selfish purchase that leaves another diminished. Of course , the pebble’s view means that you cannot find any hope for the clod and that love the truth is provides not any Heaven.

Furthemore, the pebble’s assessment of affection is deeply cynical and ugly. It truly is, however , true to both its very own experience which of the clod. The clod is “trodden upon while the pebble is definitely “of the brook.  We think about a gentle and tranquil existence within the smooth current of any stream. Typically, however , waterways also symbolise a journey from chasteness to worldliness. The water signifies the experience that flows above us during life, going out of us more aware. This kind of experience leaves the pebble implacable. We all imagine somebody who has become hardened from knowledge ” which is shown in the physical properties from the pebble. Today the water will bend about the pebble, just as the clod must fold around the feet of the cattle. This is a depiction of the world’s harshness and cruelty, and that we cannot support but value that it is the pebble’s examination of love more accurately reflects it.

In conclusion, perhaps the poem is as much about idealism and realistic look as it is about love. Appreciate, after all, is usually subject to the tendency to become both idealistic and reasonable. Ultimately although, it seems that the depiction on the planet as harsh and raw confirms a bad view of affection as similarly harsh and brutal. At the minimum, the composition encourages us to be ambivalent of love and never suppose it to be a kind of saviour capable of transcending all.

1