Censorship on the internet annotated bibliography

Research from Annotated Bibliography:

Censorship within the Internet

Kaul, V. (2012). “The positives and negatives of new press and press freedom. inches Journal of Mass Connection and Journalism, Vol. two, Issue a few.

In his study, author-researcher Kaul discussed the implications of using the Internet technology in launching what is named the new mass media, both in the context of journalistic/press liberty and liberty of expression of the detrimental society in general. More specifically, the writer provided an evaluation of the “old” (traditional) versus “new” (Internet/online) media, taking into consideration both since tools for freedom of expression, even though the latter is far more accessible. However , the article likewise discussed how a rise of the new media has not ‘revolutionized’ press independence in some countries (namely, countries in To the south Asia and South Africa). What Kaul emphasized is the proliferation of new media as an alternative of old media, yet without the expected improvement in press flexibility. Instead, what occurred is an easy “transplantation” of old media to fresh media, preserving the limited freedom in expression of the press as well as the general public.

Merlis, S. (2005). “Preserving the world wide web expression when safeguarding our children: Alternatives following Ashcroft v. ACLU. ” Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Home, Vol. 4, Issue 1 )

Merlis reviewed in his research of the U. S. Congress’ failed efforts to pass the kid Online Security Act (COPA) in the Great Court the void of creating a stability between preserving the freedom of expression on the web and at the same time, protecting children via pornographic content readily available around the Internet. COPA DO MUNDO is the U. S. Congress’ solution to ensure and keep an eye on the circulation of information and content online, particularly when persons aged below 18 years of age are using the technology. Yet , the Congress has failed to pass the COPA in the Substantial Court for the reason that latter considered COPA as too exacting, bordering about curbing an individual’s right to details and freedom of appearance. Merlis reinforced the Best Court’s suggestion to use blocking software to be used by parents/adults to effectively monitor the information/content that youngsters are able to find and get when they are on-line.

Faris, Ur., S. Wang, and M. Palfrey. (2008). “Censorship installment payments on your 0. inches innovations, Early spring 2008.

Faris et al. made a compelling disagreement about the rapid growth of online-related content and exponential regarding Internet, equally as a cultural community and a new type of economy. In discussing these benefits of the world wide web, the authors also explored the ramifications of independence to phrase and information to contemporary society in general. Currently, there is a requirement of governments to keep up with this dramatical growth of the net.