Capital budgeting case essay

  • Category: Finance
  • Words: 1044
  • Published: 12.24.19
  • Views: 364
Download This Paper

In the two capital budgeting situations corporations (A and B) have different income values and expenses as well as variable depreciation expenses, tax rates and discount rates. The members of our team needed to compute both corporate situations NVP, IRR, PI, Repayment Period, DPP, and project a 5-year income declaration and cashflow in a Microsoft company Excel spreadsheet. The future funds flows in the project and discounts them into present value quantities using a discount rate that represents the project’s cost of capital and its risk is definitely what’s must forecast the investment.

Next, all of the asset’s future confident cash moves are lowered into one current value number. Subtracting this number from your original cash expense necessary for the investment provides the net present benefit (NPV) from the investment. Making use of the internal level of return (IRR) and net present value (NPV) measurements to judge projects generally results in precisely the same findings.

Relationship between Net Present Value and IRR

Net present value of the investment is equal to the “present worth of it is annual totally free cash flow much less the opportunities initial outlay (Kewon 2013 pg 310).

When the NPV is better or corresponding to zero we should accept the project, when the NPV is unfavorable the job should be refused. Internal rate of return answers problem of what “rate of return will the project earn (Kewon 2013 pg 316). IRR is a “discount price that equates the present benefit of the project’s free cash flows while using project’s initial cash outlay (Kewon 2013 pg 316). The low cost rate is a rate which is used within capital budgeting that allows for the internet present worth of cash circulation within a job to equal zero. The higher the IRR themore desired the project is compared to lower the IRR the less desired the job is.

Consequently, the NPV method indirectly assumes that cash flows over the existence of the job can be invested at the project’s required price of returning, whereas the use of the IRR approach suggests that these types of cash runs could be invested at the IRR. The better statement is definitely the one of the NPV that the cash flows may be reinvested at the required charge of come back because they will either always be returned as dividends to shareholders, who also demand the required rate of return on the investments, or perhaps invested in a fresh investment job. (Keown, 2013). The NPV shows that Business B will be worth more than Company A. After expenses, income taxes and depreciation the company contains a value that is certainly better to get Corporation N because of a bigger IRR of 16. 94% and NPV of $40, 252. 02 than Firm A which has an IRR of 13. 05% and a NPV of $20, 979. 41.

Net Present Value

Company A 20 dollars, 979. forty one

Corporation B $40,252.02

However, with the NPV that Corporation B have it will be give the corporation, over 5 years, a current value cash return of about $40K above the 11% required rate of return. In other words, this plan will not only meet the 11% required rate, but it will give the company an additional $40. Internal Rate of Return

When a project is reviewed with the hurdle rate in viewpoint, then the greater the IRR is above the hurdle rate, the greater the NVP, and on the contrary, the more the IRR is below the hurdle rate , the lower the NVP. When using the IRR, the decision rules are as follows: If IRR >hurdle level, accept the project

If perhaps IRR< hurdle charge, reject the project.

In order for a project being accepted, the IRR must be greater than or equal to the hurdle charge. If the business is determining between assignments, then the job with the maximum IRR may be the project to become accepted. As we look at the IRR for both corporations we see that Firm B is usually higher than Corporation A that is why we as a team choose Organization B.

Company A 13. 05%

Firm B of sixteen. 94%

Profitability Index, Repayment Period and Discount Payback Period The Profitability Index (PI) is just a quantity and anything 1 . 0 or higher is confirmation intended for the task that is getting evaluated. The PI is a type of rate that gives the higher NVP every dollar on an investment. It is best used when you have more than one project comparing. When coming up with decision making procedures for the PI strategies the best task should be the the one that pays off the initial cost outlay.

The PB is the less method used in doing a capital budgeting because it does not consider the time worth of the funds earned inside the project. Looking at Corporation M is shows that it will take a few. 31 years to repayment the cash inflow to the unique cash output or the expense of the job. So when coming up with a decision on which corporation to include in PB it is advisable to take the task that pays off the initial price outlay quicker. If we look at the PI and PB pertaining to Corporation A and Corporation B we will see that Organization B is much better project than Corporation A. Profitability Index

Payback Period

Firm A 1. 08

Firm B 1 . 16

Corporation A 3. 64 yrs.

Corporation W 3. 23 yrs.

The Discount Payback Period (DPP) does consider the time value of money. It really is computed relatively like the PB method and the only difference is that DPP method uses the reduced cash flow. As we look at the DPP for Firm A and Corporation W we see that again Organization B is less time to pay off the cash flow: Corporation A 4. 6 yrs.


Keown, A. J., Martin, J. D., & Small, J. W. (2013). Fundamentals of Financing, 8th Edition. [VitalSource Bookshelf version]. Retrieved via

Keown, A. L., Martin, L. D., & Petty, L. W. (2013). Foundations of Finance, eighth Edition. [VitalSource Bookshelf version]. Retrieved from


Need writing help?

We can write an essay on your own custom topics!