Both the party system essay

  • Category: Legislation
  • Words: 1203
  • Published: 12.24.19
  • Views: 620
Download This Paper

Exactly what are the advantages and disadvantages of the two-party system in the UK? The two- party system is not a new practice in British politics.

Britain continues to be living under a two get together system considering that the mid-seventeenth Century. However , this system is still a first step toward most suggestions of English politics. Besides America, Britain is one of the just major countries that have a two get together system.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of this system? Is Britain afraid to improve its system? If this technique has been around pertaining to so long, for the reason that it has many advantages.

First of all, the machine advantages big parties with increased seats. If a party is the winner an election, whether this individual has received by a vast majority or certainly not, he gets a majority of car seats.

For example , when ever Labour earned in 1997, they acquired 60% in the seats, although they had not received the selection by a the greater part.

This positive aspects the get together because more seats suggest more power and in addition they can then impose their ideas on additional parties and be sure to complete legislation.

This leads to our second advantage; a stronger executive. With this majority of chairs, the party can, as we said ahead of, pass on their laws easily, but likewise resist ministers. This positive aspects the décider as he is certain that the party he identified for will probably be “making the law.

For instance , if Mister. Smith identified for Time in the 1997 elections, in that case he is obviously in favour of their particular ideas and laws. So , when they produce new decisions when they are in power, Mister. Smith will probably be in favour of these people, and so contains a better possibility of having the legal guidelines passed. The voter is usually therefore fortunate.

Another advantage is that the voter provides a clear choice. Because there is just one party chosen, the elector can adhere to what the party is doing, i actually. e. whether it is keeping it is promises or not. In case the party does not do what it promised it would, then the voter can then hold it dependable at the subsequent election. Also because there is no coalition in Uk Government, after that only one party can be accountable.

For example: Let’s say Conservatives guarantee during their advertising campaign to make sensible decisions during conflicts. Then comes a conflict among Ireland and Northern Ireland in europe. Conservatives, today in electric power, decide to bomb Northern Ireland in europe. Because of this, the conflict becomes much harsh which leads into a war between Britain and Northern Ireland in europe.

The voter is then conscious of the mistake Conservatives have made, and therefore can write off Conservatives in the next election.

Although the two party program has these kinds of advantages, it seems like to have more disadvantages.

To start with, voters have a very limited decision when it comes to elections.

In Britain there are various get-togethers, but just two are typically in power so far: Labour and Conservatives. Therefore , the voter seems to be obliged to choose between one particular and the different. And since they are really opposites, they may have completely different landscapes. It’s dark-colored or white colored. There is the get together of Tolerante Democrats, nevertheless the number of people voting for them is too little that must be taken into consideration (hence the two-party system).

By way of example: If Labour are arguing that Well being Services must be 100% public and Old fashioned want it being 100% personal, what will Mrs. Johnson carry out if the girl wants it half/half? Will probably be very hard on her behalf to know whom to prefer.

The choice is too limited and then the two get together system must be changed.

Second, we may think that having a 1 party authorities makes it stronger and more steady, but in fact, in times of crisis, coalition is essential.

And it is hard to believe that millions of individual voters every consciously put together and have the same ideas compared to the party.

It really is true that during the two great wars and during the 1931 recession, British Government had to resort to coalition. It truly is too hard for just one party only to make every one of the decisions sometimes of war.

Another problem with the two get together system is that most other get-togethers are disadvantaged; the number of car seats are not proportionate to the percentage of votes a party features won. If the party wins an election, whether he had a majority of votes or not, he will get yourself a majority of seats. This is unfair and undemocratic. Other celebrations get a really small number of seats and so rarely get a state during conventions.

For example: Let’s imagine during the the year 2003 elections, Work get 44% of the votes, Conservatives get 31%, Liberal Democrats get 18% plus the last seven percent go to several parties. Work are going to acquire 60% from the seats, Very conservative around twenty percent, Liberal Democrats around 10% and the relax will go towards the other celebrations remaining.

This really is unfair because Labour would not get a most of votes, and for that reason should not win a majority of seats.

The most effective disadvantage of this kind of two get together system is the “First Beyond the Post political election system. In Britain, the party whom wins the election is the one that gets the the majority of votes.

If perhaps Conservatives obtain elected with 41% from the votes, although Labour got 36%, Generous Democrats acquired 21% and remaining parties got 2%, then Great britain will have a Government that just 41% of the country will abide by. Therefore 59% of the nation will be dissatisfied.

This is absurd and completely undemocratic.

In France, an applicant can only become elected if he comes with an absolute the greater part (over 50% plus one vote). This way, it is certain that in least half of the population is content. Moreover, the President needs to elect a Prime Minister from your opposite get together. Therefore there is a coalition between your two celebrations and voters are contented.

Although the electoral system in Britain have not changed in years, it would appear that there are even more disadvantages than advantages in it.

It is treating parties unequally, and this is undesirable for a 21st Century Society.

I believe it is important to improve this system, and after that we could have a better chance of expressing each of our opinions through our selected parties.

Governmental policies is about independence of appearance and this system completely ruins our liberty.

“A State without the means of some alter is without the means of it is conservation.  “Edmund Burke

you

Need writing help?

We can write an essay on your own custom topics!