Argument analysis of the cohabitation epidemic

  • Category: English
  • Words: 439
  • Published: 12.09.19
  • Views: 491
Download This Paper

Argument, Cohabitation Epidemic, Content Analysis, Environmental Analysis

Research from Essay:

Mélange Epidemic

Discussion Analysis” “The Cohabitation Epidemic”

In “The Cohabitation Crisis, ” Neil Clark Warren argues that cohabitation between unmarried lovers is a harmful situation that is certainly decreasing the livelihood and well being of folks in the contemporary context. Warren’s argument will be based upon the idea that [state here the most important property or presumption of the argument, or the standard strategy of his argument]. More specifically, within a part of his argument Warren assumes that [or something like this] [state challenging assumption]. Let me argue that this kind of move can be problematic. In particular, is will show that… [state main idea of your disagreement].

I will begin by outlining Warren’s disagreement. He argues for this primary thesis: that cohabitation costs are elevating, changing the nature of society, which can be essentially endangering the health and welfare of future generations of Americans. Warren is essentially creating a major rift in the structure of our contemporary society. This can be one component of his debate that has a logical basis to this. After all, world and lifestyle is always growing to meet fresh environmental and technological requirements. In the article, he says “make not any mistake: We are witnessing a significant societal change before each of our very eyes” (Warren 2003). To doc this switch and attest to its relevance within societal structure, Warren does switch towards applying statistical figures to augment his argument that cohabitation rates are increasing. Warren uses credible resources, like the U. S. Census Bureau to focus on the elevating number of individuals opting to cohabitate with their partners outside of the confines of marriage.

Warren sees this kind of sociological change in residency patterns in an incredibly negative light. This individual believes that cohabitation is bad for the health and livelihood of the persons involved. Warren claims that in this kind of situations, children are in a lot less stable environments. The raising rate of cohabitation has coincided with increasing prices of children becoming born and raised illegitimately, or in single parent or guardian households.

This individual proposes the solution on advocating marriage to aid alleviate this kind of instability in the American world. Therefore , Warren he shows that “marriage presents promised résolution, ” (Warren 2003). Thus, marriage is viewed as Warren’s key to these problems.

However , Warren fails to give concrete evidence to back up his claims. This is one of several issues within

Need writing help?

We can write an essay on your own custom topics!