Are Marketers Responsible for the Use of Harmful Products in ...

  • Category: Culture
  • Words: 1672
  • Published: 12.12.19
  • Views: 293
Download This Paper Check the price for your custom essay

Mattel Toys and games is currently in the process of pulling out millions of toys and games released in the industry following disclosures that the toys have considerably high components of lead within their paint.

Extra lead could be harmful in the event that ingested by children and will cause mental retardation, an undeniable fact that elderly managers in Mattel may have been conscious of. While using blame video game on and Mattel managers assuming the part of well intentioned patients of callous suppliers, buyers can do little but wait for the next big scandal. The Mattel incident is just an additional sordid show in the history of marketers becoming responsible for the utilization of harmful items in contemporary society.

Whilst various people consider ethical promoting to be a great oxymoron, presently there also exists a human body of thinkers who believe that marketers lead to social and economic expansion, are mainly ethical and sell products that fulfil buyer needs and therefore are of use to society. The situation, while reviewed at great length simply by business professionals, social analysts and marketing academics is still topical and an issue that is certainly far from quality. The concept of company social responsibility (CSR) enjoins business organizations to consider social and community passions by taking responsibility for the result of their activities on customers, shareholders, the city, and the environment in all regions of work.

Idea extends further than the opportunity of existing legislation and encompasses non-reflex actions to ensure well being and improvement of quality of life of all stakeholders plus the community in particular. Milton Friedman, as is well known, had a thing very different to talk about. In his terms, In a totally free economy, there is one and only a single social responsibility of organization to work with its solutions to boost its earnings provided that it remains within the rules of the game’ (Lantos, 2001, p 603) Friedman procedes emphasise few trends can so thoroughly undermine the actual foundation of the free society as the acceptance by corporate representatives of a cultural responsibility apart from to make as much money because of their stockholders as is feasible.

This is a fundamentally subversive doctrine (Anderson, 1989, p. 3) Friedman is not alone in this sort of thoughts and there look like a number of experts who reveal such landscapes. Donaldson, by way of example states that corporate business owners who usually do not seek income above all else will be irresponsible in performing their particular functions. (Mascarenhas, 1995, g 46)Even while CSR is now a common enough flourish about corporate websites, many businesses, as is evidenced by the Mattel case even now firmly have confidence in Friedman’s knowledge..

Whilst the protection and furtherance of customer curiosity is obviously among the list of foremost objectives of the CSR strategy of business corporations, corporate record is studded with scams involving firm wrongdoing in areas of advertising, finance, tax evasion, environmental degradation, and community activity. CSR tenets demand businesses to sell items that are, in the first instance, safe and non harmful to customers, the immediate community, the culture at large plus the environment, irrespective of profitability things to consider or identified customer value.

Notwithstanding the current obsession with CSR (evidenced among other things by the growing Reasonable Trade movement), history the strong advantages of its steady and wide-spread denial by simply marketers and is also replete with instances of companies not only presenting harmful items in the market although also producing strenuous work to ensure it is widespread work with and expansion. Marketing has, during the past few decades become the most critical function from the modern day company. Even as the constant practice of marketing strategy has resulted in the enormous expansion of businesses, several ethical issues have demonstrated themselves in western nations, first since general issues, and later since clear enunciations by different experts.

A large number of issues relate to the introduction and distribution of products that harm and disempower buyers and communities. Marketing activity, according to experts, could be damaging towards the personal decision and autonomy of the buyer, manipulative of social values, and deceptive in its concept. In an document on Is there even more to Ethical Marketing than Marketing Ethics Michel Brennan (1991, p 10) argues that the ultimate goal in a industrial venture is some sort of profit achievements. The needs and wishes of consumers and also the wider worries for their effect on society become relevant just to the magnitude of their effect on the profitability in the organisation. With marketers following this approach many inequities have crept in the practice of marketing.

It is specifically seen to be biased against minorities just like gays and ethnic teams, guilty of unethical practices against the elderly, whom are targeted with items related to period shares, and living societe, exploitative of youngsters, who will be influenced by impressionable levels to consume processed foods and drinks, and buy unfavorable fashion ware, derogatory towards women, who also are used to elicit judgements upon sexuality instead of product features, and cynically manipulative with the developing universe, which is built the throwing ground pertaining to unnecessary, and sometimes harmful, goods. George Ritzer, in his famous book The McDonaldization of Society, (1993, p 37) illustrates in graphic depth the most pervasive and malevolent effects that mass marketing can have about humankind.

Ritzer argues that McDonaldization refers to a process wherein the principles of the fast-food sector, namely performance, predictability, calculability, and control through technology are put on numerous sectors of society on a global basis. This process, while staying immensely rewarding to businesses, has the potential to cause superb harm to world.

In McDonald’s, customers getting into fast food outlets are manipulated to pay for their food items ahead of tasting all of them, collect their particular orders by common distribution points, choose from a restricted and unimaginative selection of unhealthy and high caloric foods, sit on uncomfortable ergonomic chairs, (thus being urged to gobble their very own food and vacate their particular places fast enough), and set their plastic trays into the trash on their solution. Similar procedures, with the help of mass advertising and focussed marketing promotions, have enveloped and manipulated society in various ways.

A recently available study about confectionery retailing and promoting by revealed that merchandising decisions were influenced more by issues just like space maximisation, profitability and customer pressure rather than simply by social responsibility. (Piacentinin, MacFadyen and Eadie 2000, g 463) The role of advertising in marketing has also come under severe assault by experts who think that several hazardous values like conspicuous usage, greed, jealousy, emulation and self-centredness, mention just a few, get reinforced by marketing. Whilst reactions like these carry out carry aspects of self righteous extremism, the argument that advertising can be more restrained and less blatantly aggressive to promote consumption, especially for products that appear to be damaging to vulnerable segments of contemporary society, is also valid.

Developments in technology, buyer response and behaviour, and marketing believed have resulted in the introduction of a number of variables which may have altered both the practice of promoting and its notion in the eye of professionals, theoreticians and students. Improvement in communication and net technology has created a growth of information and provided customers with an array of choices. Only a few of these advancements have been great.

Computer and electronic connection technology make it possible for large organisations for capturing and store personal plus some times incredibly private data, on huge weighing machines, thus resulting in intrusions in the personal space and protection of individuals. Latest trends on the western part of the country have mirrored the introduction of a diverse line of considering, namely postmodernism, in most aspects of human believed and practice.

Whilst modern marketing thought, exemplified by McDonaldized world, follows extols the superiority of mechanised working, as well as extreme standardisation, and works on the achievement of progressive debasement of individuals post modernism bewilders having its plurality of currents and fashions, characterised by juxtaposition of opposing thoughts. In advertising situations, the emergence of post modernism is mirrored by the fragmentation of world, the go up of individuals, greater awareness in marketers with their ethical responsibilities and the advancement movements like this of Good Trade. The concept of QOL (Quality of Life) advertising is also quickly gaining ground.

QOL principles broadly require marketers to improve customer well-being and fulfillment without harming both the community or the various stakeholders. (Sirgy, and Dong-Jin, 1996, p22) QOL, by the very scope, is applicable to several marketing decisions and especially towards the selling of harmful items. While post modernist thinkers like Stephen Brown have already been vehement within their criticism of recent marketing thought, especially on the irrelevance of mass advertising in an significantly fragmented plus more informed world, the larger business response favors staying with accepted marketing dictum and, recently, tweaking the marketing mix to include ethical concerns.

As a result whilst there exists an admiration of the improved environment, it is demands will be yet being addressed completely in the lack of concretised tactics that can be applied to maintain and wrest competitive advantage. Rigorous research will definitely provide strategies that can cope with the changed realities in the market and enable promoting to work towards social good. In summation it would appear that even though the movement to bring in ethics in to the marketing of goods is getting headway very much work has to be done and marketers need to internalise the tenets of corporate social responsibility inside their working perceptions.

CSR aims would be perfectly served if perhaps marketers, whilst they strive for competitive advantage and organization profits also take care to observe time organised values like honesty and exactitude, honor, justice, and protection with the health and basic safety of others. Referrals Ritzer, G, 1993, The McDonaldization of Society, Pine Forge Press; Revised release (September 1995)

Need writing help?

We can write an essay on your own custom topics!

Check the Price