Analysis of written material on medical treatment

Quantitative Research

Seriously assess the worth of quantitative research by reviewing literary works on the treatment options and progress anxiety disorders.

Clarke, Chen and Guastella (2011) looked at the effects of cognitive behavioural remedy (CBT) on patients using a diagnosed anxiety disorder and their attention biases. The patient’s anxiety was scored using six tests, 1 being the Depression, Anxiety and Stress scale (DASS), they also participated in an attention bias test out on the computer. In the anxiety section of the DASS the pre-treatment score mean of members was 19. 64 this kind of then decreased by five. 88 factors after the patients CBT sessions. Clarke, Chen and Guastella then claim that participant’s preparedness to acquire attentional biases forecasts that they will be able to reduce anxiety vulnerability.

Hudson et al. (2015) researched and compared kids with anxiety attacks responses to CBT periods. The experts used The Spence Children’s Anxiety Scale to gather quantitative on the severity of the children’s anxiety symptoms. After this the kids were given a course of CBT, and then were reassessed against the criteria to get an anxiety disorder. These outcome was then converted to percentages of youngsters who will no longer met the criteria and as opposed. A significant percentage of the children no longer suit the criteria for all types of tension disorder inside the post-treatment and follow up assessments. Besides obsessive compulsive disorder who remained at 57. 1% in both tests.

Barrowclough et al. (2001) researched the effectiveness of CBT and supporting counselling to get anxiety symptoms in older adults. It was measured using the Beck Stress Inventory, Hamilton Rating Level for Anxiety, State Attribute Anxiety Inventory and several other depression arrays. These strategies of collecting data all require self-report constitute the participants and supply scores, that means quantitative data. Barrowclough ain al identified that CBT was a highly effective treatment to get anxiety, due to the fact CBT sufferer scores upon Becks Anxiousness Inventory reduced by 15. 68 details in the post treatment examination in comparison to the supporting counselling group, who only reduced their particular scores simply by 9. 0 points.

Unfortunately as a result of previous 3 studies collecting quantitative data, the research could possibly be considered reductionist. The research workers are unable to select CBT being a particular reason behind the decrease of the panic attacks, in the participants. This is due to the truth there is just a positive relationship between acquiring CBT and reducing panic, there are various other extraneous parameters that the researchers need to consider as a possible basis for the loss of anxiety disorder symptoms. For example the huge amount of anxiety and pressure that may be place on the individual by bosses may have been eliminated and therefore they may not feel the anxiety symptoms anymore. For that reason CBT is definitely not the key reason why that the scores have gone down, it is the removal of the conceivable cause of anxiety. This shows that research collecting quantitative data is reductionist as it does not consider other factors that may impact the treatment of anxiousness. This considerably lowers the value of the research as it does not provide a certain treatment pertaining to anxiety.

Sharif and Armitage (2004) investigated the effects of counselling upon nursing students anxiety. That they used the Hamilton Anxiousness Rating Level to gauge the nursing scholar’s anxiety plus the self-esteem from the individuals. They will found that counselling improved the self-esteem from the students and reduced all their anxiety. The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Level mean ratings began in 16 details and decreased to ten features in the follow up assessments.

Arthur (2005) investigated the extent that stress induced anxiety and depression for workers who use occupational anxiety counselling strategies, as a treatment. Arthur (2005) used thirty-three institutions and interviewed personnel using the Overall health Questionnaire. He found that of all staff interviewed a mean subscale credit score of 13. 93 skilled anxiety and insomnia. Above half (57%) would have taken time off of work if we were holding not having coaching. Although, 34% of staff had previously ‘sought out’ help for their anxiety and stress prior to Arthur (2005)’s research happened.

1 strength of research collecting quantitative data is that the data is aim. Therefore it cannot be twisted or effected by the researcher biases. This is because the quantitative info is a reality to the analysis that has taken place. This means that in Arthur’s (2005) investigation in to the extent that stress brought on anxiety and depression for workers, according to participants 59% of staff would have considered time off because of their anxiety or perhaps depression. Yet , if Arthur (2005) acquired asked the participants whether or not they ‘think that they may have taken time off function if that they hadn’t experienced counselling’ he could have received subjective data such as ‘Well maybe I might have, yes’. To fit this data in a category Arthur would have were required to decide whether to rely it as being a yes or maybe a no response. He most probably would have explained yes, in order to support his hypothesis. Which means that research that collects quantitative data is more valuable in this kind of sense, mainly because you know the researcher has not changed the data.

Schmidt and Richey (2009) were researching the effects of focus training in anxiety. thirty six participant’s took part in in having their anxiousness measured making use of the Leibowitz Sociable Anxiety Size (LSAS) and many more tests, including the Beck Major depression Inventory ” II. Schmidt and Richey found that within the LSAS the attention training condition lowered their anxiousness score by 24. 49 points whereas the placebo group simply decreased simply by 5. 29 points.

Blumgart, Tran and Craig (2010) tested the difference among anxiety amounts in adults clinically determined to have a stutter and those without. They did this kind of by using a two to three hour interview consisting of mental questionnaire booklets. Blumgart, Tran and Craig found the stutter group mean score was thirty-five. 5% going through anxiety. However the only twenty-four. 6% of adults with out a stutter experienced anxiety.

In discourse on Blumgart, Tran and Craig’s (2010) research they consider that ‘Stuttering is linked to abnormally elevated social anxiousness. ‘ That means the experts have drawn a direct realization from the correlation that more stuttering equals even more anxiety they will found off their collection of quantitative data. Even so Blumgart, Tran and Craig have no evidence that stuttering causes anxiety and that not any other parameters effect the development anxiety, while people with no stutter obtain anxiety as well so it can not be solely as a result of having a stutter. If they had likewise conducted part of the research while using collection of qualitative data, asking the individuals direct queries about their past experiences, tension they may be encountering and other mental illnesses and the participants did not experience any of these, the research workers may have been capable of more accurately deduce that stuttering causes raised levels of stress.

Dunlop et ‘s. (2007) investigated the effects of Tiagabine (4-16mg each day for doze weeks) within the severity of social anxiety attacks in individuals. Dunlop ain al. (2007) allowed a few participants to change to the placebo group for week 12. However the quantitative data collected from the LSAS showed there were no medically significant enhancements made on the ratings at week 12. Even though following week 12 significant score improvements were seen.

Dempsy ou al. (2009) researched the consequences of Paroxetine medication on alcoholic beverages dependant people with social anxiety attacks. They also utilized LSAS nevertheless no factor in the severity of anxiety was found in the Paroxetine group in comparison to the placebo group.

In the investigations in to medication as a treatment for anxiety attacks, both literatures show the LSAS utilized to determine stress severity. This test produces quantitative data. However , every participant in both research had to total the LSAS twice within the experiment, this could mean that require characteristics may well affect the benefits that the researchers collect. This may be because the participants think that they may have answered these people wrong the very first time, which is why they have to do it again. They could also response them untruthfully the initial or both equally times to be able to fit with what they consider as social best practice rules. Both concerns would produce valueless exploration and therefore would invalidate any conclusions the researchers draw.