Amgen s whistleblowing ethical scenario case study

Conformity, Moral Dilemma, Honest Dilemmas, Meaning Development

Excerpt from Case Study:

Amgen Whistleblowing Case

Amgen can be described as Thousand Oak trees, California-based firm that found the unenviable task of dealing with law suits filed by 15 says on the allegations of a Medicaid kickback plan. The company also experienced two extra whistleblowing legal cases that were recorded against that in Bonanza County simply by former personnel who charged the company of sacking after they detected unethical practices inside the firm’s procedures and reported the wrongdoings to managers. Amgen provides experienced these kinds of lawsuits intended for alleged dishonest practices inspite of enacting a Code of Ethics that emphasizes the need for employees and everything organizational stakeholders to do the right thing.

According to Amgen’s Code of Ethics, personnel are not only urged to do the ideal thing although also asked to resolve honest dilemmas through evaluating the legality of proposed activities, compliance with organizational plans, company’s beliefs, and evaluation of honest issues including rights and respect. Shawn O’Brien allegations and the so-called retaliation seem to be contradictory for the principles and practices embedded in Amgen’s Code of Ethics. The allegations by simply O’Brien apparently contradicted the principles and procedures established inside the code through failure to examine the legitimacy of suggested actions. On the other hand, the alleged retaliation against O’Brien violates the principles and practices since they do not any foster the adoption of right procedures as stated in company policies. Moreover, the retaliation had not been based on the firm’s value and evaluation of moral issues like rights and respect.

Whistleblowing is defined as a great employee’s disclosure of underhanded, illegitimate, immoral, and against the law practices simply by employers to the people or organizational stakeholders together with the capability to put in force effective actions (“What can be ‘Whistleblowing’? inches par, 1). In some cases, whistleblowing is a term that can likewise refer to the disclosure of wrongdoing by simply organizational users regarding a problem considered to be of public interest. There are two different types of whistleblowing i. at the. internal and external whistleblowing. Internal whistleblowing is defined as reporting wrongdoing in people within the firm with adequate authority to cope with the issue while external whistleblowing is reporting wrongdoing to the people outside the organization like the relevant federal agency (Dworkin Baucus, s. 1281). Presented the facts of the case, O’Brien took appropriate steps to report his concerns because the first step will require performing internal whistleblowing. Since his initial work proved useless, O’Brien should have considered executing external whistleblowing rather than hang on to file court action upon retaliation.

From an ethical perspective, O’Brien’s actions