A thesis on poor nursing interaction and safety of

Pages: 3

Medical is based on the effectiveness of communication as well as the quality of patient basic safety. Nursing interaction is the way health care associates communicate the patients’ demands by maintaining precision of patient-centered decisions and patient protection by minimizing harm (Potter, 2013). This kind of essay will certainly focus on a case of inadequate nursing conversation and poor patient safety. To guide the summary of the case American Nurses Association (ANA) specifications of practice and performance and ANA code of values will be used to determine what recommendations were not used. The Company of Medicine rules, recommended techniques, and I-SBAR will be used to determine the guidelines that could have transformed this case for the better.

Case of Ineffective Medical and Poor Patient Safety

In November of 2000 a 12-15 year old youngster, Lewis Blackman, came to Medical University in South Carolina(MUSC) to fix his condition, pectus excavatum. Postoperatively, Lewis is positioned on Toradol for pain which can cause stomach ulcers and needs close monitoring, nevertheless due to ineffective assessment and communication Lewis dies by a punched ulcer (Monk, 2002). The ANA requirements of practice and performance plus the ANA code of values will be used to help discuss what guidelines are not met that might have avoided future sufferer harm.

ANA Standards of Practice and Perfomance

Lewis Blackman’s case identifies BÊTISIER standard assessment of practice and normal of communication performance guidelines not achieved. Assessment can be how the registered nurse collects complete data from the patient (ANA, 2010). Useful assessment has not been met in Blackman’s circumstance because the rns did not have early correct data and communicate info to the doctor. The rns needed to implement early evaluation to improve sufferer care (Voepel-Lewis, 2006). The nurses failed to communicate data to the health care consumers and professional team (ANA, 2010). During Blackman’s assessment the nurses noted a heartrate of 126 while the doctor documented 70, this miscommunication was perilous. Doctor-nurse interaction provides patient positive final results, which was unaccomplished for Blackman. (Torppa, 2006).

ANA Code of Integrity Provision 3 and some.

The CHOIX code of ethics evaluates the nursing staff in Blackman’s case. In provision several nurses promote, advocate, and strive to protect the individual and correct inefficient nursing patterns (Fowler, 2010). In Blackman’s case the nurses were not preventing harm because the patient was not regularly monitored. The need for frequent monitoring and examination can detect postoperative complications (Voepel-Lewis, 2012). In provision 4 the nurses are in charge of and responsible for providing the best possible nursing care (Fowler, 2010). An responsible nurse understands the duties a nurse are responsible and liable to the patient for (Fowler, 2010). During Blackman’s evaluation the nurses were unaccountable for providing correct view and irresponsible for sufferer safety. Rns are supposed to end up being the patients’ advocates not really the opposite (Torppa, 2006).

Start of Medicine Reports

The caliber of Health Care in the usa of the Commence of Medicine (IOM) reported that health care is doing more injury than the program should allow (IOM, 1999). In the IOM reports To err is definitely Human: Building a Safer Overall health System, Crossing the Quality Chasm, and Keeping Patients Secure: Transforming the task Environment of Nurses provide guidelines that help prevent long term patient harm from healthcare system errors.

To go overboard is Human being: Building a More secure Health Program

The problem derives from defective systems, procedure, and circumstances that lead nurses to make mistakes or perhaps be unable to prevent them (Kohn, 2000). Regarding Lewis, the hospitals system was flawed, the doctor-nurse relationship was poor as well as the nurses marriage and trust to the mother was not maintained. The need to increase standards, put into action safety, and identify problems is very important to get future improvements (Kohn, 2000). After Blackman’s death alterations were integrated at the MUSC including the forbidden use of Toradol in pediatrics.

Crossing the product quality Chasm

Issues that occur in the health proper care services will be overuse (where harm is greater than benefit), underuse (absence of service), and misuse (preventable injury occurs) (IOM, 2001). We need to aim for safe, successful, patient-centered, regular, efficient, and equitable look after providing for the patient (IOM, 2001). In the event these desired goals were directed for during Blackman’s circumstance it didn’t have taken the nurses 31 hours to understand his symptoms were fatal, the rns would have been Blackman’s supporter and affected person safety might have been the primary priority.

Keeping Patients Safe Transforming the Work Environment of Nurses

Monitoring patient overall health status, carrying out correct treatments, and applying patient treatment are nursing jobs duties that directly maintain your patient safe (Page, 2006). Patient safety can be ascertained if rns are staying educated to avoid skill spaces (Page, 2006). In Blackman’s case the nurses reported him of experiencing gas aches and remarkable fever decrease as recovering signs whilst Blackman’s health was declining. Assessment education could have avoided Blackman’s death.

Recommended Techniques

Blackman’s circumstance is preventable with becomes the postoperative pediatric analysis and patient-doctor-nurse communication. The ANA standard of examination practice, revealed how the nursing staff were ineffective in taking Blackman’s vital signs. Healthcare professionals are required to integrate patient analysis, data collection, helping, and recognizing symptoms to make decisions within an ongoing assessment (Voepel-Lewis, 2012). Patient-doctor-nurse interaction is vital to get patient security. Blackman’s circumstance showed poor communication among nurses and the doctors due to differences in info and poor handover connection. Nurse and doctor conversation has to be crystal clear for efficient patient care (Diwakar, 2010). The doctor and individual communication was unaccomplished since the nurse don’t gain the trust of Blackman’s mom. Nurses intiate discussion, target the matters for appointment, and have an active part in caring for the patient (Torppa, 2006). Examination and interaction of the physicians and healthcare recipients should be efficient intended for patient attention to occur.

How to Prevent this Situation Employing I-SBAR

Being a future registered nurse I would have prevented this example by using the connection tool I-SBAR. I-SBAR is short for for handovers, patient information, from rns to doctor s that states person’s situation and background and the nurse’s examination and suggestions (Diwaker, 2010). If I were one of Blackman’s nurses I might have explained to the doctor, “Hi my name is Caitlin Endly on the postoperative pediatrics ward and I was calling about 15 year old Lewis Blackman. I am unable to get his blood pressure, heart rate is usually 96 is better than per minute, pallor, and is possessing a seizure. He recently had surgery to fix his pectus excavatum and is currently on Toradol to regulate his pain. I am currently noticing him. I think the problem is a perforated ulcer from Toradol. I need you to come see him STAT. ” I might have provided efficient analysis and connection to prevent long term patient injury.

Conclusion

Lewis’ case is among the man y hospital program mistakes that are performed each year. His case could have been prevented in case the efficient make use of assessment and communication guided by the ANA and IOM were achieved. The use of I-SBAR would have kept Lewis your life and in the future nurses will be able to learn the simple analysis and connection skills we learn within our first semester of nursing jobs school conserve a 12-15 year old boy’s life.