A film analysis of 12 angry guys a film directed

doze Angry Guys, Film Research

12 Irritated Men (1956) is a film about a court docket jury deciding the verdict of a murder trial. The film incorporates a small group with the standard doze person jury. The film itself can be summarized while 12 males arguing within a room for an hour and a half but we’re here to talk about the group’s dynamics.

The group is a second group. It is a team with all the purpose of completing a task. The interdependence from the crew is the foundation the entire motion picture. Because it’s a jury the 12 men have to make a unanimous decision regarding the case. Every person in the group has an effect on the other people within the group. Initially all but one man view the defendant since guilty, because of the interdependence from the crew, they are not capable of reaching the objective without that man’s vote being the same. As Interaction Matters (Kory Floyd) puts it “small organizations are cohesive”. In this group, they are working towards the common goal of any verdict. They require cohesion to achieve it.

The group develops pretty quickly from building and having stiff presentation to storming and getting intense and rude with one another. Through the first have your vote towards a verdict there seems to be a little public conformity groupthink that takes place like a man or maybe more raise their hands a little hesitantly towards the vote for guilt ridden. To avoid this later one man whom voted simple put forth the concept to do an anonymous vote to remove pressure in the rest of the group so every person could truly feel they had the possibility to political election freely. This kind of works and begins the the jury one by one changing their ballots to not guilty. Eventually the when the jury reach the ultimate verdict of not guilty the final man to change his election seems to suffer a bit by private popularity groupthink. Since everyone is at this point opposed to him, and that he is no longer certain showing how to continue his argument, he concedes and changes his vote.

Early on one man assumes the simple role since leader. This individual keeps persons organized and tallies the votes tracking the groups progress. As they has no true power in the group and informally required the position this individual leads in a democratic way. Mostly visible in the way he always demands if folks are opposed to getting a vote or perhaps the voting approach. However in the group you will find in a way two leaders. Since in the beginning only 1 man votes not guilty, it is them place on him to lead the movement of going through the possibility of a not guilty verdict, thus having the leader from the whole group and a sub innovator with a further task within the group.

The group partakes typically in find solutions to problems communication (Communication matters pp. 213-214), debating evidence to determine which method to election. The group also engages in encounter connection the controversy often gets heated and the conversation improvements from the circumstance to by one another, also during fails the court members discuss amongst the other person about not case related subjects such as weather or jobs.

At one particular point down the line in the process when ever most of the group has changed it is vote to not guilty. One of the men still voting responsible gets incredibly stressed and aggressively yells his argument, rather than indulge the man through adding fuel towards the argument, the boys turn away from charlie to disengage from him and enable him termes conseillés to diffuse the stress with the situation. The yelling guy lacking a group is forced to settle down and decompress. The conflict resolution technique being that of avoiding.

Because of the environment the group not every the a few steps to getting socialized into a small group take place. Because court duty is definitely mandatory the boys didn’t have to think about in the event they planned to join or not producing the predecessor phase not really applicable. The anticipatory period was likely heavily in play however the film doesn’t show it. The face would have occurred in the court room. The assimilation phase took place as the jury had been in the room determining a decision. Finally the exit phase took place when all the guys made the cohesive vote of not guilty and left the court hosue having completed their job.