63414520
- Category: Documents
- Words: 2476
- Published: 01.24.20
- Views: 387
string(108) ‘ as the Movie director of , Blackadder’ \(Source D\) regarding Field Marshall Haig great drinks cabinet\. ‘
Source A is a part of text authored by Haig just before the challenge of the Somme (July 1916 to November 1916), That explains that in Haig’s opinion the nation has to agree to the loss of warfare. He thinks that even so well an army is educated and led they will need to bear surrender. This is true although not to the magnitude of the Somme where the allies alone lost a massive 620, 000 men.
Haig wrote this kind of extract monthly before the initial attack suggesting that this individual knew there was clearly going to certainly be a large amount casualties. This also implies that he hadn’t manufactured much of an effort to change the tactics and save the lives of men nevertheless lazily decided to prepare area of heavy losses. In this extract, a stubborn area of Haig has been let loose with his mind concentrating simply on the triumph of the battle, no matter what the costs. For example Haig states ” a region must be educated to bear losses” and “no of skill will permit amount of victories to get won, with no sacrifice of men’s lives” giving all of us the impression that his determination pertaining to victory would stop at practically nothing.
Before arriving at a realization to this issue, we must consider Haig’s qualifications as well as his current location. Sir Douglas Haig acquired had a lengthy military profession fighting in lots of battles and wars such as Boer Conflict where he acquired served in the Cavalry. During his 40-year career he previously lost a large number of comrades and it is probable that certain toughness will grow inside him and he will discover how to forget about the despair of loss of life. We must remember that Haig is the Standard of the Allied Forces, he may want to be portrayed as a hard man willing to take difficult decisions. All of us also know Haig is actually a religious person. Would a religious man send out a man to his death without nurturing?
In the end I do think , care’ is too strong a word. From your evidence above I conclude that Haig sent men to their fatalities, because he individually and actually believed him self to be doing the right issue to succeed in victory. Haig do care, nevertheless he was a classic fashion general using outdated fashion method to succeed in a modern day war.
Study Sources B & C:
Which one of these sources will you trust even more?
Sources B and C are both simple extracts via accounts from the battle in the Somme. Haig wrote resource B on the day before and through the initially attack. This individual states “the men will be in marvelous spirits” and wonder how men could be in these kinds of “splendid spirits” when they are living lives in a trench, most likely suffering from trench foot and feeling homesick. This makes us wonder if Haig has in fact visited the men in the front line, because he will find that the “spirits” of his troops are not because “splendid” as he described. Likewise when Haig states “the barbed line has never been slice so well” we know that by Private George Coppard (Source C) account that the barbed wire was one of the main reasons for such a top casualty list on the initially day, if perhaps anything the wire because of this if the bombardment, was “in a a whole lot worse tangle than before”.
Haig’s statements are hugely contradicted by Coppard whose frame of mind towards the Officers “who informed them the fact that artillery fireplace would pound such wire to pieces” suggests to us the fact that morale from the men was not as high as Haig had predicted. The phrase also tells us that the line was not minimize to allow troops the break through to the A language like german line. This is certainly enough for people to question the stability of Supply B. Nevertheless , if Resource B is unreliable, the question must then simply be asked why will a top English General produce such transactions. The reasons could possibly be many, amidst which one can include that Haig might have been poorly knowledgeable, for political reasons, or just to keep comfort up equally at home and the front.
Additionally, there are many reasons for what reason Source W is not accurate, between the most important data are the many eyewitness accounts and the actuality that the British Army experienced more than half million casualties through the battle.
It might be argued that Coppard’s interview is the connection with one man through out the 15-mile distinctive line of the Somme. However , whereas Haig could gain credibility and keep his job by simply lying, it truly is unlikely that Coppard may wish to tarnish the memories of his overdue comrades by simply lying about the actual incidents with the Somme. Factually, the evidence helps Coppard’s circumstance. The facts tell us that there were over fifty-five, 000 casualties on the initially day. Haig claims it was a successful attack” whereas Coppard describes the “hundreds of dead”. Evidence supports Coppard when he claims that the line was not totally cut although Haig declares, “the cable has never been slice so well”.
Coppard’s purpose in doing the interview was probably to reveal the truth and horrors of war and maybe to make sure the mistakes of war will never be repeated. Haig’s purpose on paper Source M was almost certainly political and also to maintain his position. Thus i conclude that Source C is more dependable as it pertains to the confirmed facts.
Examine Sources M & E:
These two options are not regarding Haig plus the battle with the Somme. How far do you consent that they have zero use for the historian studying Haig and the challenge of the Somme?
Sources Deb and Electronic are both designed to amuse the group. Source G is a comical TV series of life within a trench. Yet , Source Elizabeth is a piece of antiwar divulgación and even though it has been made to amuse, it stocks and shares the same standpoint as the Director of , Blackadder’ (Source D) about Field Marshall Haig and his beverages cabinet.
I think a vem som st?r studying Haig and the Somme would locate Sources G and Electronic of extensive use. They will both show popular ideas of Haig, one during the event and the other 60 years later. Like a television series, Origin D could present landscapes that the majority of the folks agree with to be able to boost is actually ratings. This suggests that most people agree that Haig was a poor innovator. The series , Blackadder goes Forth’ shows the two side of war, lifestyle in the frontline trenches then in the General’s headquarters. This will likely give a vem som st?r an insight towards the conditions in the trenches and that of the head office.
However , Resource D was performed 60 years after the war therefore the director should have made it applying sources just like E and also other possibly accounts.
Source E also reveals how males were kitted out and how poorly teaching would have prepared them pertaining to the reality from the war these people were about to fight. This is useful as it displays how much believed they offered to the teaching and installing of his troops.
I do think both resources are tightly related to a vem som st?r studying Haig as they demonstrate view shared by many persons, which is essential. Source E also tells us that the entire of the nation did not support the conflict propaganda and it gives a historian a tip to Great britain during 1914-1918.
Study Resources F, G & L:
Do Resources G and H provide evidence that F is definitely wrong?
Resource F can be an extract from a recent book named “British Butchers and Bunglers of Universe War”. The tone with the title is derogatory, specifically towards Haig. The book centres for the popular look at, that Haig was a bungling old basic. The publication, like various written, is dependent on opinion rather than on reality. Whilst the book most likely contains statistical evidence, the success or failure Haig’s battle technique is to a great extent based on opinion. The writer has not taken into consideration that WW1 was the first kind of war to get fought in trenches and with machine guns. I believe it’s unjust to blame Haig (who was trained as being a cavalry officer) for not having developed a successful strategy. The author has also neglected to mention got Haig certainly not reacted at the Somme, french would have been taken in Verdun as well as the German armed service would have overcome the Uk.
Source G is an extract through the “German Recognized History of the First Universe War” which in turn surprisingly contradicts Source Farreneheit. Unlike a number of other sources, this extract compliments the United kingdom for their victory. Source G is informing us which the victors in the Somme received a great spirits boost for the future. It also resulted in the Germans had shed all of their knowledgeable soldiers, which will weakened the German the front line. It seems as though the Germans happen to be praising Haig, unlike Origin F. However , this source may also be questioned given that during writing the Germans were paying large reparations to the allied forces so they might have believed if they could retain in good terms with the allies, they may be in a position to clear some of the debt. However this is unlikely.
Origin H was written by a British general 57 years following your battle of the Somme. Due to amount of time between battle as well as the time of composing, it is possible that that of other folks has inspired his memory space. Especially if he previously risen to the rank of General, he would have been in a place where Haig was respectable, as his superiors had been followers of Haig. Nevertheless whilst it has some worth, it is more likely that the Standard as a military person can appreciate even more Haig’s approach. He commences by saying the The german language armies were broken by the “courage an resolution of Haig’s armies, which acquired complete assurance in the leadership of their commander”. This entirely contradicts Source F which will claims Haig was a horrible commander.
To conclude whilst Origin F repeats a popular look at of Haig, I believe that Sources G and H does prove F incorrect as it was written one with a fellow basic with military training and from German point of view which usually had not any reason to become bias.
Examine Source My spouse and i & T:
Why do you think that sources I and J fluctuate about the Battle with the Somme?
Resources I and J are comments of Lloyd George during and after the Struggle of the Somme. Even though the sources have been written by the same gentleman they totally contradict each other. It is nearly as if the extracts had been written by several men.
Origin I can be part of a letter written by Lloyd George to Haig after his visit to the battlefields during the battle of the Somme. Lloyd George appears to be congratulating Haig on the challenge plans. He seems sure battle goes in their favor yet it absolutely was still another month until the fight ended.
There are several reasons why Lloyd George did not write that which we would have anticipated him to write down. Firstly, Lloyd George would have wanted his General to become confident in the actions, he’d have to motivate him. Second it would be silly to start a quarrel together with your General during a battle and bad for the morale in the troops.
Origin J is usually an remove written by Lloyd George inside the 1930’s. He could be now 14 years later criticising Haig professing that at the time of his go to he was mixed up by the cavalry in Zero mans Land.
Now 14 years later and with no need to encourage Haig he echoes freely. However it may also be that at the time of producing Source My spouse and i he did not see the faults in the United kingdom line up and it is in Origin J lying down to try to quit any pin the consequence on falling on him because Secretary of War.
Analyze all the Resources.
“Haig was an uncaring General whom sacrificed the lives of his troops for no real reason” How far do this sources support this kind of views.
I believe that these resources do not go far to compliment this perspective. This is based upon the following:
Sources A and N written by Haig himself, most likely shows his deficiencies as being a modern day innovator not necessarily an uncaring butchers.
Source C written by written by a private inside the army, while giving a practical picture in the trenches could hardly possible view the overall technique.
Sources M & E whilst relevant in promoting the populist perspective, again will be biased.
Resources F, a recently created book, once again follows popular view and is a better game titles to sell books.
Sources G is probably the the majority of unbiased perspective given that it was written by the enemy with little to get. This source perhaps gives the biggest insight into Haig’s approach.
Source They would again does not support the view outside the window of the problem, and was the simply sources written by a many other general who have been competed in warfare.
Sources I and J both written by Lloyd George, features the difficulty in coming to any kind of conclusion. He contradicts him self and states convincingly to get and against, proving the question, despite having the benefit of hindsight, is a tough one to solution.
Need writing help?
We can write an essay on your own custom topics!