55232522

research Carry out women’s ideas of ‘normal’ birth complement individuals held simply by professionals? Fuzy Aim: To explore the definitions of normal labor and birth held simply by women who have never given labor and birth, what influences that perspective, and compare it with those of medical researchers. Background: Readily available evidence supplies conflicting definitions of normal childbirth. Nearly all available evidence encapsulates the views of the health professionals themselves or ladies who have experienced having a baby.

Very little evidence is available that displays the opinions of women however to experience childbirth. Method: Six participants had been identified through purposive sampling to undertake a small exploratory qualitative study using semi-structured selection interviews and thematic analysis. Moral approval was obtained. Benefits: The definition of normal labor and birth is person and intricate. The absence of complications and use of concours influenced this definition, which part agrees with health professionals’ current explanations.

Birth was perceived as a scary possibility, a view mainly constructed from unfavorable stories by friends and family. Conclusions: The findings suggest that functioning within the confines of a definition of ‘normal’ childbirth is usually far from uncomplicated. It features a need to encourage females to view delivery more efficiently. Expanding this kind of research further more would explore these issues in more detail, offering more conclusive evidence to support practice. pondering to happen, each need to agree with what a ‘normal’ birth actually is.

With these kinds of thoughts in mind, this research study set out to explore the comprehension of normal labor and birth held by women who include yet to see birth, what influenced that understanding, and just how closely their particular responses matched the range of definitions and ideas organised by health professionals. Background Labor is multidimensional and requires a definition that covers all aspects (Downe, 2006). Nevertheless , differences of meaning happen to be in use by simply various vocations, and not one of the meanings truly encapsulate all facets of childbirth or perhaps provide a consistent definition (Gould, 2000).

For a few, childbirth with no intervention is normal and ideal, for others, as long as the baby comes into the world vaginally with out assistance then this creates a normal birth. The term ‘normal childbirth’ continues to be used for decades as a way of differentiating among birth final results often with regards to producing record data. Yet , with continual scientific developments and a great ever-changing world, the restrictions of what could be termed ‘normal’ are becoming blurred, especially where interventions (and distinct degrees of interventions) are concerned.

The earth Health Corporation (WHO) (1996) defined normal birth since: ‘Spontaneous in onset, low risk at the start of work and staying so through labour and delivery. The newborn is born spontaneously in the vertex position, between 37 and 42 completed weeks of pregnancy. After birth mom and baby are in good condition’. Conversely, however”and only a year later” Beech (1997) contended that: ‘ the expectation that every pregnant state should end in a healthy mother and baby no matter what, offers actually prompted the justification for use of interventions’.

Uk Journal of Midwifery ¢ November 2011 ¢ Volume 19, No 11 A Alison Edwards Senior Lecturer in Midwifery, Birmingham Town University Jacky Conduit Lecturer in Breastfeeding and Physiotherapy, University of Birmingham having children experience making healthy mom and baby is optimal. Finding agreement on the proper way to achieve this, specially when considering the diverse nature of childbirth, is complex. Several articles and projects have shrouded giving birth in conflicting viewpoints and approaches, going out of even health care professionals struggling to agree on a regular definition of normality.

Childbirth has increasingly end up being the focus of television shows, generally cleverly edited to represent childbirth towards a more ‘entertaining’ approach, or to fit a storyline as opposed to actuality (Savage, 2006). Alongside this kind of the internet features further offered women with a plethora of new perspectives in childbirth and has possibly influenced all their perceptions. With an discovered goal to minimize the number of caesarean sections and aim toward birth with out intervention (Department of Wellness (DH), 2007), it could be contended that women must be able to function alongside health professionals towards achieving this goal of ‘normality’.

It could become suggested that to begin to allow this unanimity of 720 research A lot more recent opinion statement by the Maternity Treatment Working Party (MCWP) (2007), (which contains members in the National Having a baby Trust, living promoters of intervention-free birth), reflects a number of the changes in all their definition whereby some affluence such as enhancement of labour, the use of electric monitoring and an active third stage, happen to be acceptable. Interestingly, epidurals and episiotomy are excluded from your context of normality in this definition. A study by Downe et ‘s (2001) likewise raised even more questions than answers.

All their study raised the issue of ‘commonality’ as a take into account ‘normality’, i. e. perhaps the rise in the caesarean price has led to this kind of becoming regarded as a ‘normal’ birth. Subsequently, they figured when establishing a percentage rate for typical births, by discounting women who experienced the usage of any concours such as debut ? initiation ? inauguration ? introduction and episiotomy, then the percentage of genuine ‘normal’ births drops considerably. Downe et al (2001) and Bad (2002) likewise question the use of terms including ‘according to rule’ or perhaps ‘commonplace’ in definitions, being a caesarean may now be considered commonplace but arguably not really ‘normal’.

Gould (2000) and Crabtree (2008) concluded that several midwives considered birth to get normal in case the woman noticed it as normal, further more developing the viewpoint that normality is usually individual to the woman and this every labor and birth experience is exclusive. Anderson (2003) and McGuinness (2006) questioned the need for a definition in any way and believed about the impact of pushing mothers to aim for normality, when the midwives themselves are unclear about what it is.

However , Anderson’s work relies primarily around the findings of 1 author and despite a convoluted voyage through the materials, merely displays how complicated an issue regular childbirth is becoming. DeClercq ain al (2005) reported on a substantial study of new mothers who were asked to describe their particular birth tales. The majority of the American ethnic community women interviewed had knowledgeable some degree of medical treatment. Although many felt that interference has not been wanted or perhaps required, simply 10% declined it.

Cronin and McCarthy (2003) discovered the influences on ladies perceptions and concluded that the very best influence originated in family members. The sample used, however , consisted of predominantly adolescent mothers, which can explain the reliance around the family for facts. Phenomenological studies by Höhe and Dahlberg (1998) and Gibbins and Thomson (2001), evaluated which the women they will interviewed every felt that they can wanted a lot of control over their birth experiBritish Journal of Midwifery ¢ November 2011 ¢ Volume 19, Zero 11 nce but there have been gaps inside their knowledge which are usually filled by family or data from the media. These research of women soon after birth or perhaps during pregnancy additional demonstrated that women didn’t genuinely consider a few interventions to become a problem. The fact that was clear in several of the studies, however , was that a positive birth experience triggered higher pleasure rates in the overall childbirth experience, a conclusion supported by the comments found in an accumulation of births tales documented simply by McHugh (2001).

A few quantitative studies were found simply by Hundley et al (2001) and Sandin-Bojo et ‘s (2008). In spite of using substitute methodology, all their findings backed the links between positive sights of being pregnant, women’s preferences and the result, and the likelihood of inappropriate utilization of interventions. Having performed a substantial search using Cochrane, CINAHL and MEDLINE alongside principal and second references and seminal texts, the majority of offered studies were conducted throughout the antenatal and postnatal period. No evidence was located which studied women’s viewpoints before that they became pregnant.

This research was therefore evolved to consider these concepts and resulted in the study question, ‘Normal childbirth’: Carry out women’s definitions match those of health professionals? Analyze design The principal aim of the study was to explore the meanings of usual birth organised by ladies who have but to experience labor and birth, what influences that point of view, and assess their views with those of health professionals. Objectives The main aims of this study were to: m Gain regarding whether girls that have but to experience having a baby have similar definitions of normality um health professionals m Explore whether there is a dependence on improved education of women regarding childbirth m Gain regarding what impacts these could perceptions of birth. Because the main purpose of this small explorative research was to check out women’s presentation of ‘normal birth’, a qualitative approach was picked. A semistructured interview was selected as the ways of collecting info, as this is well suited for the exploration of the awareness and thoughts of respondents especially with complex and very sensitive issues. This approach also enables probing and clarification of responses to happen at the time of the interview on its own.

This in turn enhances the validity with the find721 study ings (Parahoo, 1997). A semi-structured interview is particularly valuable as it allow the participants to share with their own reports, in the way they choose, with no constraints of predetermined concerns, as in a questionnaire (Rees, 2003). Yet , interviews may be time consuming, sometimes difficult to organize, and it can take time and practice to become a powerful interviewer. description validity’ while maintaining rigour and trustworthiness (Savage, 2006), the interviews had been audio-taped.

The discs were destroyed in completion of the research, but till then were stored firmly. To maintain privacy, each participator was supplied with a pen name from the outset in support of the researcher was aware of the participant’s true id. Prior to the interviews taking place the participants had been provided with an info sheet, outlining the research task and had been asked to sign a consent kind. Relevant demographic details were collected. Clarification regarding conference of the introduction criteria was sought just before each interview. The purpose was pertaining to the interviews to last for up to 45 minutes.

To aid focus and consistency, while providing room for flexibility, an interview timetable was drafted using predominantly open-ended queries. A preliminary run of the questions to be applied was taken on and any adjustments made before beginning of the analyze. This info was thrown away and these participants were not involved in the analyze. The final open-ended questions included: l What has motivated the way you perspective childbirth? m How important would having a regular birth be to you? Even more probing concerns were released as the interviews progressed, to develop the exploration of the consumer issues elevated by the participants.

A small ‘Thank you’ gift idea consisting of a gift voucher was handed to each participant of the primary study upon completion of the interviews. To assure validity and rigour (Flick, 2009) calculated sampling, an audit path, interview plan and tape-recorded interviews were used. Trustworthiness or believability was preserved through extended contact and discussion of data with the members to review the interpretation from the findings. Sampling Purposive sample was used to ensure the participants fulfilled the addition criteria. Unlike quantitative analysis, with qualitative studies small samples are accepted as the norm (Higginbottom, 2004).

Introduction criteria The criteria for add-on in this examine were for girls to be of childbearing age group between 18 and forty five years, no longer working in the field of overall health, and without personal connection with pregnancy or perhaps childbirth. There was no constraints on level of education, ethnicity, religion or traditions. Those women who fell outside of the age ranges or who had experienced any level of childbirth which include miscarriage may not be eligible to participate. Primary searches started with a message to woman staff in the researcher’s office, i. at the. an institute of higher education.

Initially there is limited respond to the first request, but further searching led to an overall total of six women helping out to get involved. Two volunteers, however , did not fulfil the criteria and were therefore certainly not interviewed. The four women fulfilling the inclusion requirements were functioning as management staff and were between your ages of 22 and 30 years. Three were in stable interactions, although not hitched, and the 4th was currently single. Numbers of education ranged from A amounts to Bachelor degrees. 3 were light British and one player was white colored Irish. None of them of them experienced any good or personal experience of childbearing.

Time limitations unfortunately inhibited any further queries, which do lead to a limitation within the variety of females volunteering. The ultimate group therefore demonstrated the same range of qualities and demographics which may give a more refined perspective. Yet , there is opportunity in future study to broaden the search to include ladies from other interpersonal backgrounds and ethnic organizations. Ethical endorsement Ethical approval was wanted from the research panel at the University and consent was obtained from series managers to approach staff and use the rooms for the selection interviews.

As the study did not require patients and was not carried out within NHS premises, further more ethical authorization was not necessary. The values panel naturally permission to proceed offered the aforementioned actions regarding confidentiality were adhered to. It was clarified to all members at the outset that they can could take away from the analyze at any point and this if some of them were upset at any level during the interview it would be ended and Uk Journal of Midwifery ¢ November 2011 ¢ Vol 19, Simply no 11

Semi-structured interviews In order to put the members at ease the interviews took place in exclusive, within the participant’s workplace and with a girl researcher. To help transcription from the data and avoid ‘compromising 722 research support offered. In cases like this non-e in the women expressed any issues or exhibited any signs of distress. Much of the previous literary works concentrated around the definition of ‘normality’ being relevant to whether interventions were used within the work.

Annabel experienced that the definition of ‘normality’ acquired changed over the years but identified that ‘commonality’ actually made birth usual. This most likely contradicts Duff’s (2002) theory that conditions such as ‘commonplace’ are not valuable when understanding normality. Annabel and Lucy both assumed that if the lot of persons used ‘gas and air’ for example , this made it typical, but as epidurals were employed less often they were certainly not considered typical: ‘ ¦ the epidural and not as many women work with that”they you do not have that, other than when they possess complications. (Lucy) These replies to some extent shown a recognized link involving the use of even more ‘significant’ interventions and a typical or otherwise final result, thus saying yes with some of the MCWP (2007) definition and far of the current evidence. So that they can explore the respondents’ definition of normal birth in more interesting depth, questions were asked about the between the conditions ‘natural’ and ‘normal’. Reassuringly the replies reflected what many medical researchers would think about a difference.

Annabel initially struggled to decide the actual difference was, but then concluded that: ‘Natural would be not having every one of the drugs and what not really , It is quite normal to have drugs and pain relief and everything those kinds of things’. Or perhaps as Anne said: ‘I think an organic birth can be naturally expecting without any medicines, doing it like the normal pet way not having some support. ‘ The usage of pain relief thought highly in most of the transcriptions but there was not a opinion on if their use deemed a birth ‘normal’ or otherwise. In spite of further probing, limited info were attained on the make use of other surgery apart from medicines.

Annabel and Victoria would suggest that using a forceps beginning could be deemed normal to them as well as all of the members expected to be in labour for a long period and have stitches, but different possible surgery were not mentioned. This may have already been due to an expressed lack of knowledge about labor or Uk Journal of Midwifery ¢ November 2011 ¢ Vol 19, Not any 11 Analysis Once the selection interviews had been registered and transcribed verbatim, a process of thematic analysis utilized. Thematic research is a way of identifying, examining and credit reporting patterns (themes) within data.

It minimally organizes and describes the information set in (rich) detail (Braun and Clarke, 2006). Different techniques are described below but are based upon the process of familiarization with the transcribed data and identifying habits or topics occurring inside it. These are generally then coded line-by-line to help further research. As part of the researcher’s audit trail and to obtain greater quality of the findings, the researcher’s interpretations from the data was discussed together with the individual participants and quality sought wherever required following interviews (Flick, 2009).

Results Following analysis, three main themes emerged: birth devoid of complications can be regular, individual and important, delivery is unpleasant and terrifying, and the finest source of knowledge is relatives and buddies. Birth with no complications is normal, individual and important When ever asked the way they would specify ‘normal’ delivery, the women provided mixed and individual answers: ‘so an ordinary birth would not need any drugs or wouldn’t need any”what’s that help? , an epidural or nearly anything like that to assist you”you’ve got the baby and you’ve had no complications. (Jane) Éxito felt it turned out acceptable to have epidural and still have a typical birth. The lady supported the suggestion that birth is definitely individual: ‘It’s quite confusing really, because natural is exactly what I’d find as typical but in world today, usual doesn’t indicate natural mainly because caesareans are quite normal umm , to my opinion all different types of giving birth are seen as normal. Every person woman like”I know that for each and every individual girl no motherhood is exactly the same so it is typical for some girls to have a caesarean and some females not to and everything different types of birth. 724 analysis due to the fact that they were not directly asked about it by researcher in order to avoid impacting on the replies. What do prove to be a tremendous concern for these individuals centered on having complicationfree work rather than an intervention-free 1. For example , the moment Annabel was asked what she would want from her birth encounter, she chatted of: ‘¦ just sort of a generally easy labor and birth without the complications and what not, the long extended labour and things like that. Jane chatted along identical lines: ‘I think my personal idea is that as long as the newborn comes away healthy and there’s been not a problem then novice a normal birth’. She ongoing further later in the interview when asked how important usual birth was: ‘I believe it would be important because 2 weeks . massive event so you want to contain it set up in the mind that that’s the way I would like to do it , if surgery have to happen you understand why these things need to come in. Her stated her friends had been sharing their very own bad tales because they are ‘dramatic’, she surely could view the reports more objectively: ‘From the stories heard about it staying so agonizing but as very well it becoming quite a good experience and this you’ve got a kid and you forget about all the pain. ‘ Éxito had gained most of her information from the colleagues the girl worked with and felt that up until that time she understood very little about this, she reported that the reports she experienced heard ‘made me experience funny about it’.

All of the participants were asked to consider the effect the media and tv had issues perception of childbirth. Most likely reassuringly these types of participants acknowledged that the approach childbirth is definitely portrayed is normally far from reasonable and all believed that the greatest influences always been family and friends. This compares favourably with the function of Fierce, ferocious (2006). Additional common threads ran through all of the selection interviews, including the requirement for the absence of complications and that it was typical to give beginning in clinic.

Both Jane and Victoria briefly mentioned home delivery but may not consider it on their own for fear of something going wrong. commented of the lack of know-how about childbirth when asked the origin of their details, family and friends highlighted highly. However, most of the tales the members had observed were negative, further raising their anxieties about experiencing childbirth for themselves: ‘everyone which had a baby talks about this, it’s just not something My spouse and i fancy carrying out at all”although some of my local freinds have had just like the easiest birth ever, I am inclined to focus on the not-so-easy births and believe ‘oh my personal god! head wear would be me’. ‘ (Annabel). Birth is definitely painful and scary Not really unexpectedly (although not directly asked about), all the participants expressed fear of the unknown regarding childbirth, particularly the degree of discomfort they likely to experience plus the potential for, as Victoria expressed it, ‘to lose control’. Victoria likewise expressed a fear of her body and ‘how this works’ and just how ‘it’s such as a bit degrading’. In fact , non-e of the participants felt keen to undergo a pregnancy and birth for, as a lot of expressed this, a ‘fear of some thing going wrong’.

On a more positive note, yet , the majority observed pain as a necessity and the outcome of your new baby caused it to be worthwhile, since Jane surmised: ‘It’s meant to be from what I’ve observed one of the most unpleasant things you can do is obviously but then by the end it’s worth it. ‘ Discussion This study had an recognized research question with crystal clear objectives, principally to assess women’s opinions of normal childbirth with prevalent opinions of health professionals as reported in existing literature. Three distinct topics were identified which echo some of the evidence available by studies with women who had already experienced childbirth.

Berg and Dahlberg (1998), by way of example evaluated which the women that they interviewed all felt that they can wanted a lot of control over all their birth encounter but there are gaps inside their knowledge which was filled usually by members of the family or English Journal of Midwifery ¢ November 2011 ¢ Volume 19, Not any 11 The very best source of knowledge is friends and family This brand of questioning resulted in the most conversation and volume of data created. Throughout the interviews all of the participants repeatedly 726 research coming from reading in the media.

Also in 2001, Downe ainsi que al investigated the concept of the use of interventions, including caesarean section, becoming ‘commonplace’ and therefore the norm. Indeed a few of the participants through this study believed along comparable lines In the event direct comparisons are made to definitions provided inside the available literature, then to some extent we can conclude that the definitions of women and health professionals meet. Some of the affluence listed in the MCWP’s explanation matched all those expected by the participants. However , formulating a distinction among ‘normal’ and otherwise proved less simple.

It is evident that the females recognized giving birth as an individual concept, and this it was important to them to include a normal birth as they identified it, research by Gould (2000) and Crabtree (2008) reflect that health professionals generally acknowledge this kind of. Perhaps controversially, it could be asserted that the aim of differentiating among types of birth is placed with the generation of record data, supporting funding asks for or even a professional need to justify one’s activities, rather than helping achieve what appear to be the women’s aspires of a healthy outcome regardless of method.

Devoid of seeking to encourage an increase in operative birth, perhaps removal of a definition of normality which excludes or contains specified interventions may move some way in assisting to ease the pressure on women to adapt an ideal. Crabtree (2008) describes how in New Zealand, the use of affluence has markedly altered the meaning of normal birth although midwives produce efforts to protect their ladies by for example , encouraging residence visits to women at the begining of labour, delivery is becoming more and more medicalized with interventions getting the norm.

Plainly, achieving a birth without the interventions and complications is ideal, and midwives are conditioned to promote ‘normality’. However , the ladies who took part in this examine feared the pain of childbirth plus the possibility of any kind of complications, such as a prolonged work, far more than having virtually any interventions just like an epidural or stitches. This is like conclusions driven by Lawrence-Beech and Phipps (2008) that despite many years of medicalization and increasing input, women’s hopes for a healthy baby and to experience ‘physically and mentally whole’ after the beginning have remained consistent.

The 2007 record from the MCWP goes a way toward knowing that a switch may be required in thinking about the issue of common concours and ‘normality’. More considerable research is had to provide further more clarification. Uk Journal of Midwifery ¢ November 2011 ¢ Vol 19, Zero 11 For the women who experienced no connection with childbirth, what proved to be a substantial concern was having a complication-free labour instead of an intervention-free one.

About the influences upon women’s perceptions of normality, the majority of info indicated family having the most powerful influence. Regrettably birth was often pictured negatively which clearly attempts women. This perhaps gives a need to reconsider the approaches medical researchers take the moment educating girls about their ability to give delivery. Reflection It was the researcher’s first attempt at utilizing this approach of data collection and research and it is identified that an effective interviewing approach takes time to produce.

Initially the interviewing technique was quite stilted and potentially important leads could have been missed. Yet , by utilizing the interview routine as a help, the latter selection interviews were much more relaxed and a greater amount of exploration of the points increased was empowered. As pointed out by Green and Thorogood (2004), we needed to consider potential ‘issues of prejudice due to the affect of the researcher, particularly when they may be in the effective position of health professional’.

To redress any disproportion of electrical power and allow the individuals to speak with relieve (Holloway and Wheeler, 2002), the selection interviews were executed within the participant’s workplace at the same time convenient to these people. There is also the possibility that the individuals said what they thought the researcher planned to hear (Rees, 2003). In this instance it was essential for the specialist to maintain a neutral stance during the interview. Only brief responses to 727 ISTOCKPHOTO research Tips Finding arrangement on the easiest way to achieve a proper birth can be complex m For health care professionals to work with women to achieve the aim of ‘normality’ there needs to be agreement in regards to what a ‘normal’ birth is l In assessing what women seriously considered ‘normal’ beginning, three main themes emerged: birth with out complications can be regular, individual and important, labor and birth is painful and intimidating, and the very best source of know-how is friends and family l The results demonstrated an overall limited knowledge of childbirth among women, however as with medical researchers there was distress as to what constitutes normality articipants’ direct questions were presented and leading questions had been avoided. Also, it is inevitable that to some extent the interviewer’s experience and knowledge would effect the process and maybe the interpretation of the data. To minimize this kind of impact the researcher aimed to ‘bracket’ out her individual views before the interviews had been completed. This kind of involved hanging the researcher’s feelings whilst accepting that her very own values is going to impact to some degree on the research (Lavender ain al, 2004).

In this instance, yet , the researcher’s knowledge demonstrated beneficial during the interpretation method as it empowered direct comparison between a health professional’s view which of the participant’s. Conclusions The findings on this small study have simply begun to scratch the top of initial interrogation. Much of the research undertaken prior to this was performed on ladies who had experienced childbirth, therefore women who had yet to try out childbirth had been selected to get study.

The results demonstrated an overall limited knowledge of childbirth, but , as with health professionals similar confusion over what constitutes normality prevailed. The opportunity to get more extensive research presents itself since this was a restricted sample size. With a bigger sample better conclusions can be generated, offering greater promoting evidence for any rethink more than what constiBJM tutes normality in today’s world. Anderson G (2003) A concept analysis of ‘normal birth’.

RCM Evidence-based Midwifery 1(2): 48″54 Beech BAL (1997) Normal delivery ” can it exist? IS DESIGNED Journal 9(2): 5″8 Höhe M, Dahlberg K (1998) A phenomenological study 728 of ladies experiences of complicated labor. Midwifery 14(1): 23″9 Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology three or more: 77″101 Crabtree S (2008) Midwives creating ‘normal birth’. In: Downe S, ed. (2008) Typical Childbirth: Facts and Controversy.

Churchill Livingstone, London Cronin C, McCarthy G (2003) First time moms ” determining their needs, belief and encounters. J Clin Nurs 12(2): 260″7 DeClercq E, Sakala C, Corry MP, Applebaum S (2005) Listening to moms II: Survey of the Second National ALL OF US Survey of Women’s Having children Experiences. L Perinat Educ 16(4): on the lookout for Department of Health (2007) Maternity Concerns: Choice, Gain access to and Continuity of Treatment in a Safe Service. The Stationery Office, London Downe S (2006) Engaging with all the concept of exceptional normality in childbirth.

BJM 1(6): 352″6 Downe T, McCormick C, Lawrence Beech B (2001) Labour affluence associated with regular birth. BJM 9(10): 602″6 Duff Elizabeth (2002) Normal birth: ‘commonplace’, ‘according to rule’ or perhaps ‘well adjusted’? MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 12(3): 313″4 Film U (2009) An Introduction to Qualitative Exploration. 4th edn. Sage Guides Ltd, London, uk Gibbins L, Thomson I AM (2001) Could expectations and experiences of childbirth. Midwifery 17(4): 302″13 Gould D (2000) Usual labour: an idea analysis.

L Adv Nurs 31(2): 418″27 Green L, Thorogood N (2004) Qualitative Methods for Overall health Research. Sage Publications Ltd, London Higginbottom G (2004) Sampling issues in qualitative research. Registered nurse Res 12(1): 7″19 Holloway I, Wheeler S (2002) Qualitative Study in Nursing. 2dn edn. Blackwell Posting, Oxford Hundley V, Jones M, Graham W (2001) Assessing women’s preferences for intrapartum treatment. Birth 28(4): 254″63 Lavender T, Edwards G, Alfirevic Z (2004) Demystifying Qualitative Research in Pregnancy and Childbirth.

Quay Books, Wiltshire Lawrence -Beech BA, Phipps B (2008) Normal delivery: women’s testimonies. In: Downe S, male impotence. Normal Giving birth: Evidence and Debate. Churchill Livingstone, Birmingham Maternity Attention Working Party (2007) Producing normal delivery a reality. RCM, RCOG and NCT, Greater london McGuiness Farreneheit (2006) Determining normal birth would help midwives and mothers. BJM 14(6): 328 McHugh In (2001) Storytelling and its affect in transferring birth traditions through the ages. Midwifery Issues 89: 15″17 Parahoo T (1997) Nursing Research: Rules, Process and Issues.

MacMillan Press Limited, London Rees C (2003) An Introduction to Research for Midwives. 2nd edn. Books pertaining to Midwives Press, Cheshire Sandin-Bojo A, Wilde Larsson B, Hall-Lord Meters (2008) Ladies perception of intrapartal care in relation to WHO recommendations. M Clin Nurs 17(22): 2993″3003 Savage JS (2006) The lived connection with knowing giving birth. J Perinat Educ 15(3): 10″24 Community Health Firm (1996) Proper care in Normal Birth: An acceptable Guide. WHO, Geneva United kingdom Journal of Midwifery ¢ November 2011 ¢ Vol 19, Zero 11