54286196

Media, Political

The book The Problem of Media: U. S. Communication Politics in the Twenty-First 100 years written by Robert W.

McChesney discusses the void of media Change. He states that, “The Policies, structures, subsidies and institutions which might be created to control direct and regulate the media will be responsible for the logic and nature of the media system whether their very own content is good, bad or maybe a combination, the media for that reason presents a political difficulty for any contemporary society, and an unavoidable 1 at that (16).

He contends that we now have two primary issues with this problem. The initially problem is the structure that creates this article of the information and the second is the constructions themselves. He thinks that the approach society can make it decisions approach structure the device and how it decides to solve this requirements reformation. Debates, he believes, can direct form and produce value to the media system.

McChesney produces of how multimedia will exist in all communities. But their structure and content is decided cultural, monetary and political and this decides the amount of solutions each contemporary society has to pick from. In different societies the controlling authorities decides just how this is structured. This individual mentions dictatorships and severe regimes will make the type of press that will influence and give him more power and stopping any chance of competitors. Which has a democratic culture the problem is available between individuals with power and others with none. In this society the ability is with the media in fact it is this power that gives a strong support in home of democracy making media a political tool.

The issues with multimedia being a politics tool within a democracy, he states is known. The foundation of this is that in order to have a democratic world the residents must be informed and the media is the tool for this. It is not which the media is always to create the democracy but help to make it more effective to members of the society. The issue in the reform is about content. If it is well balanced with landscapes that exhibit both sides with the road. Giving an opposite stand to democracy, equally important for the society members to make selections on how to composition their society and even more significant is how media influences economics.

Media’s beginning affects were in economics and soon propagate to politics. McChesney believes that, “In the us the starting point for clasping the problem with media is definitely seeing in which the media fits in the larger capitalistic financial system (117). 55 between the part media offers in the profit-making commercial organized organizations plus the need for info that works with information needed for a democracy. “It is this stress that fuels much of the cultural concern about media and media policy making (17).

The author provides great focus on the meaning of problem and just how it relates to what is regarded the problem of media. I thought this to be kind of repetitious because he gives meaning to the term problem typically throughout the book. I thought that maybe he was looking to make a point at exactly how media will take something and give it so many different meanings as he did. He then procedes give a history of the mass media to give the visitor a sense of where it was caused by to see exactly where it was going. Providing a good historic account from the affects of broadcasting inside the 1930’s that created the way our society makes media policy.

Then he moves in to an analysis into how media started to be corrupt, deceitful, and lacking ethical bases just through this century. McChesney is convinced that the United States has not confronted these challenges making media a servant to those in society that are self-servant. These are generally the ones that make any decisions in exclusive such as the multimedia corporations that are driven by profits, ignoring what society needs.

“This system provides contributed to a political crisis of the top magnitude and unless it can be confronted directly will greatly limit the ability to help to make progress about any of the additional major interpersonal and personal problems that encounter the nation (21). Media should assist to give the contemporary society an ability to have educated debates in issues that arise from that contemporary society.

After browsing the book it gave me much to think about, but genuinely no clear solution. Granted he did talk of reforms but in what perception? I think reform should certainly come in the way we inform our society. Now with new technology liberty of speech is a whole new attitude. Everyone has some thing to say, whether right or wrong. I do think there should be some kind of change, but I’m not sure what type of reform would be effective. Education society more on what the meanings of context and content will be more effective than trying to define the problem in multiple methods.

I really failed to understand circumstance or content until We went to school. Is actually pretty simple but applying it each day wasn’t a thing I did until college. Now everything We read or perhaps see on television I carry a materials of salt, until I research it a little more I don’t hold it the case. This type of education has to be applied in primary learning structures. This would support greatly with structuring a proper informed contemporary society.

I felt the book was very informative, although difficult to go through. In my opinion that this tends to make a very good publication for educational structures to use. This awakened an issue in me that I understood was there, but actually didn’t think about too much. I believe this kind of to be pretty true with much of society. Just yesterday a friend had pointed out something he had heard around the radio regarding making youthful school children in Australia stop sing a Holiday song that used the phrase “Ho, Ho, Ho because of the implications of it can meaning, hottie.

At first I used to be shocked and angry although after thinking awhile I first believed, the content was not probably reliable or it was taken fully out of context of course, if it had regarding a more important issue We would have explored the information to obtain the truth. This is why In my opinion media reformation is something that needs to be dealt with but the step to the solution can be education.

Works Cited:

McChesney, Robert W. The Problem of Mass media: U. T. Communication National politics in the Twenty-First 100 years. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2004.