Download This Paper


string(82) ‘ invisibility allows those to continue to get pleasure from benefits that women cannot access\. ‘

Title: Repercussion has been identified as a complicated have difficulty over normativity (Robinson, 2000). What does this kind of meanHow can your concept of backlash help us understand the relative positioning of men and women in organizations?


Men have in the past occupied a hidden, gendered space within the work environment. Their privileges compared to girls, and their electricity compared with females, have gone unnoticed through this invisibility.

Through feminism, there has steadily arisen an awareness of these concealed inequalities, as well as the ways in which men have been prioritised as the ‘neutral’, taking over voice in the workplace. This consciousness has led to a few redistribution of power, since women carry out greater responsibility, more powerful roles, and obtain better pay. Nevertheless , the consequences of the have been that men have, in most cases, started to see themselves because victims of women’s expansion in the workplace through the phenomenon of backlash. Although seemingly a straightforward concept, backlash is intricate and tricky to assess, and contains a number of consequences for both males and females. The notion of normativity helps us understand the ways in which victimhood has been appropriated by a few men to reclaim the power they experience they have misplaced. Ideas around backlash and normativity experienced a number of effects for the workplace and efficiency politics, a lot of detrimental to can certainly position, however are suggestions that the correct approach to equality can defeat these issues.

1 . Introduction

This essay will appear at the notion of ‘backlash’, the idea that people are resisting methodized organisational attempts to ensure that marginalised workers are utilized and given opportunities intended for promotion. While the concept sees a number of marginalised workers, by way of example people of colour and people with problems (Burke and Black 1997), this essay will consider only the case of ‘backlash’ for men against women workers. Male ‘backlash’, it has been said, has persisted for some a lot of time, and is more robust now than previously (Faludi 1991). Backlash can be unconscious: guys may be ignorant that they contain the attitudes they actually towards women (Burke and Black 1997).

First, the notion of ‘backlash’ will be talked about, and the ideas that it presents “a challenging struggle over normativity (Robinson, 2000) analysed. Next, the essay will certainly consider the way the notion of backlash is useful for understanding the hierarchical human relationships between women and men in organisations.

2 . The Concept of Backlash

In order to understand the concept of backlash, it is first important to look more closely at men’s position within organisations. It has been contended that in a number of status as gendered moves unnoticed on their own and by other folks within the enterprise. Men happen to be assumed to be the norm, and to speak for the entire of human kind (Nelson 2006). Typically, males in organisations are unaware of themselves as guys, with “self-knowledge as gendered subjects ¦ noticeably absent (Whitehead 2001, p. 309). However , your being a man means living in one of (at least) two possible gendered positions. When gender is a visible ‘fact’, with the majority of (but not really all) men and women being visually distinguished consequently, behind this ‘fact’ “gender is enacted, and world has a pattern of techniques and expectations that make this enactment visible (Bilimoria and Kristin, 2007, p. 38). While frequently seen as a genderless, cerebral environment, the workplace, no less than other ethnic and cultural contexts, can be one in which organisational decisions are made within an embodied, gendered context (Whitehead and Moodley 1999). Inside the workplace, sexuality differences are present both noticeably and invisibly, and at a variety of levels. Probably the most important of those levels is a symbolic: many ways in which language, clothing, physical symbols, printed media and similar function to express positions about gender. Ideas, perceptions and perceptions also help the complex mixture of engenderment in the organisation. The social and political structures of an organisation may well appear fairly neutral, however it will probably be based upon invisible engenderment for deeper amounts (Blanpain et al 2008).

It should be noted, nevertheless , that reputation of the gendered nature of the workplace should not be taken as a straightforward binary between male and female: “transgender identities further complicate notions of the gendered subject. Additionally , invisibilities of libido further confuse the matter: the relationship of lesbian porn to womanhood, and the homosexual man to masculine identities, needs also to be regarded as (Melzer 2006).

There is an unfair harmony of electrical power between men and women in the workplace, with men generally getting better shell out, conditions and holding higher positions inside organisations. Women’s abilities as leaders frequently go undetected or are dismissed, and the phenomenon of the ‘glass ceiling’ can be well-documented (Haslett et al 1992). This unfair equilibrium seems to be a function of gents invisibility while gendered topics: if guys are recognized unconsciously to be the norm, then simply women happen to be by classification outside the tradition, and are therefore subject to poorer work circumstances including pay out and advertising.

One reaction to this is for the oppressed groups to act for making people mindful of men’s benefits and provide for light all their hidden engenderment. This opens the possibility of producing the inequalities between men and women visible to all or any. Mutua (2006) describes “unearned benefits which in turn men possess, just by getting born men, and suggests that rather than viewing the inequalities between people in the workplace with regards to how terribly women will be treated, we all reverse this kind of and look at, for example , how much more guys earn normally than do women (Mutua 2006).

In general, there has been a concerted work in many countries to generate gender inequalities in the workplace more visible (Kabeer et al 2008). This could, however , make the privileged group ” males ” defensive and irritated. By making people more conscious of male engenderedness, and by using the inequalities that hides to light, ‘backlash’ can result, as guys start to see themselves because victims. Consequently, they begin to occupy an ambig position, both equally invisible and visible. There are reasons for males to claim the two states. Brown suggests that men have good reason to want to be unseen, as invisibility allows these to continue to enjoy benefits that women cannot access.

You examine ‘Backlash have been described as an intricate struggle above normativity’ in category ‘Essay examples’ Nevertheless , they can as well gain by being visible, and obvious as a great oppressed group, a sufferer of feminine power (Robinson 2000). Faludi (1991) manufactured the concept of ‘backlash’ popular. Whilst, she suggested, anti-feminist feeling has always played an element in modern day America, there have been particular cases of backlash in recent background, particularly when “women are ready to make true gains in social and political life (Boyd 3 years ago, p. 5). For Faludi (1991) backlash works by presenting an reverse position because the truth, through blaming girls for larger social problems, that is, blaming feminism for creating problems for females, rather than providing a solution to such problems (Walby 1997)

The notion of ‘backlash’ is often presented being a simple effect by guys against a rise in could rights. Yet , the idea is far more complex than this advises. For example , it might cover different types of male resistance to attempts to redress inequalities between the genders: men whom may once have approved of this in principle, but now no longer do so, and those that have never authorized of equal rights for women (Goode 1982). Repercussion has also transformed over time, with Faludi (1991) arguing that it can be more common right now than in the past. This increase could possibly be down to several reasons which include increased competition in organisations for shell out and situation, the growth of political correctness in the workplace, and increased media coverage of gender inequalities. Men can also be increasingly conscious of how the office is changing, with women gradually increasing more power and taking on functions that used to be the only preserve of men (Burke and Dark 1997). Backlash can also be seen as an function of male low self-esteem over a changing world, because men blame women’s increased power for ills which usually befall them. These emotions are fuelled by a mainly right-wing mass media and corporate tradition (Kimmel 2004).

Estimates differ regarding the prevalence of backlash. Early studies (Astrachan 1986, AMOI 1988) suggested that up to 90% of males were in favour of women retaining a traditional role. While repercussion in organisations seems to have recently been clearly determined, there are fairly few scientific studies evaluating its prevalence, and an absence of clarity about the best ways of measuring that. Many research workers use the Implicit Association Check, a larger social psychology test made to measure computerized associations between mental concepts in memory space as a way of quantifying implicit stereotypes regarding gender (Rudman and Glick 2001)

In addition there are different understandings of the impact of repercussion on the wider workplace: repercussion can enhance tension among men and women, makes bonds between men better, and can crack relationships between women towards the extent that ladies have carved a role within the male environment or certainly not (Burke and Black 1997). Backlash is sometimes known as ‘competing victim syndrome’, a expression used by Cox (1995) to describe the ways through which, in education, boys curiosity groups tried to define a posture of subjects of feminism (Mills 2001).

There are several elements which can worsen backlash. In the event that an organisation lacks effective interaction both about the phenomenon of repercussion and procedures that can be delivered to combat it, men could be suspicious of any changes. When a clear circumstance is made for aggressive measures for women, backlash is less likely (Gandossy et ing 2006). If perhaps men happen to be excluded via equality organizing, or if they happen to be not known as part of the answer to inequalities, in that case this can likewise make repercussion feel even worse. Organisations can take practical procedure for including guys in this kind of planning, for example identifying a core number of men whom are devoted to women’s legal rights and ensuring support coming from senior management (Ruxton 2004). Certain efficiency structures can also make backlash more extreme. For example , where a culture of blame is definitely fostered, with men viewed as the causes of women’s disadvantage, men are more likely to behave negatively against any understanding that women’s situation in the workplace is improving. Equally, in the event the organisational lifestyle has prioritised men and masculinity, probably unconsciously, men may react more strongly against could improving circumstance (Angus 1993). It is also which backlash is usually stronger in organisations where a higher quantity of minority staff have been used onto the workforce.

As seen, the idea of backlash is definitely not as simple as it provides sometimes recently been portrayed inside the media (for example, a recently available daily snail mail article appeared to blame feminism for entrée in the Countrywide Health Assistance (Phillips 2011)), but rather, since Robinson suggested, it may alternatively be a challenging struggle over normativity. That is, it worries a larger debate about the concept of the ‘norm’ and what is considered as the ‘normal’ in society today. The notion in the norm can be seen as rooted in principles of the all-natural, and what is inherent or given in being human, rather than a social, political or cultural create. By identifying that the ‘norm’ is, in fact , a create, we wide open ourselves to the possibility that the given could be changed. Feminism in general is seen as a have difficulties against the notion that femininity and masculinity as they are knowledgeable in today’s world are fixed. This idea that the woman (or male) is a provided is maintained much of contemporary science (Cameron 1995). Brown suggests, in this context, that seeing men as victims of feminism is not as straightforward as being a reversal of positive discrimination, but is part of a greater debate about the ways through which normality is usually defined, and hence as part of a debate about normativity (Robinson 2000). Because Robinson (2000) points out, the idea of masculinity, and the knowledge of what it means to get male, is definitely open to issue, can be challenged, and may change. He likewise emphasises that the debate above normativity is usually one about power, who have holds electrical power in contemporary society, and whether they rightfully do it.

Seen in this kind of context, the move by which men have shown themselves as victims can be not simply one which happened by simply chance. Instead, men have had the capacity to take on board the power that is certainly currently vested in the ‘victim’: portraying themselves as oppressed (Bekerman and Zembylas 2011). Backlash, below these terms, becomes a intricate struggle to get control over hard to find resources and power over the symbolic different languages in which symbole of masculinity and femininity are normalised. Men use backlash as a means of making themselves visible since men and since victims, to accrue the rewards which come with being known as the disadvantaged partner (Robinson 2000). Subsequently, by claiming the status of subjects, men have the ability to maintain all their position since those in power and control, with the added esteem and material gains that goes along with this. Privileges are obscured by the fabrication of victimhood which men have decided to wear. It should be noted, yet , this issue is manufactured more complex by debates about the notion of power. A few suggest that power relationships really are a myth, during your stay on island is an illusion that power is definitely vested inside the hands of your minority, in reality all teams in contemporary society are oppressed: “power is truly a form of a myth which will subjugates most people (Bad Subjects 1998, p. 55).

3. Repercussion and the Modern Positions of Men and Women in Organisations

These suggests that repercussion is a sophisticated concept which will underpins recent developments in contemporary understanding of feminism and women’s legal rights. But what effects does this have got for comprehending the positions of both men and women within organisationsThere are signs that backlash is thriving in operation and organization organisations. Writing of the UNITED STATES in the early years of the 21st Century, Bilimora and Piderit suggest that females were progressively ‘opting out’ of the world of business, for example moving on to start their own businesses, to some extent as a result of a backlash up against the notion that girls can ‘have it all’ and successfully juggle house and job (Bilimora and Piderit 2007). This proceed to self-employment and starting your own business as a way of stepping outside the hostility in the male-dominated business environment has been reported anywhere else, for example The United states of america Small Business Association reported a 58% progress in ladies running businesses (SBA 1993), while Carey and Bryant (1995) suggested that women-run businesses had been expanding into previously male-dominated areas (Carey and Bryant 1995). It has also been reported that women can experience violence as consequence of special projects designed to encourage equality, can be over insular as they connection together in women-only networks, thus ruling out the prospect of a further strike on male power buildings, and available to charges of elitism (McCarthy 2004).

However , some organisations have found that endorsing equality steps in the right way can easily avoid repercussion. Wittenberg-Cox and Maitland (2009) describe the situation study of Nestle, whom sought to prioritise male or female equality in the workplace. That they rejected the diversity approach popular in the USA in favour of marketing gender balance. Their procedure was to involve men, and particularly man leaders, from the outset, with sexuality awareness workshops for leaders and management. They discovered that this procedure saw men committed to and leading organisational change, plus the company hence “avoided the backlash that is common in companies that launch “women’s initiatives (Wittenberg-Cox and Maitland 2009).

some. Conclusion

To summarise, men have historically occupied an invisible, gendered space within the work environment. All their privileges compared to women, and the power compared with women, have hot unnoticed through this invisibility. Through feminism, there has steadily arisen a comprehension of these concealed inequalities, and the ways in which mankind has been prioritised as the ‘neutral’, over-riding voice at work. This consciousness has led to a lot of redistribution of power, since women accept greater responsibility, more powerful roles, and obtain better pay. However , the consequences of the have been that men have, in some instances, started to find themselves while victims of women’s development in the workplace through the phenomenon of backlash. Although seemingly an easy concept, backlash is sophisticated and difficult to evaluate, and includes a number of consequences for both males and females. The notion of normativity helps us be familiar with ways in which victimhood has been appropriated by some men to reclaim the energy they feel they have lost. Ideas around backlash and normativity have gotten a number of effects for businesses and organisational politics, a few detrimental to could position, although there are ideas that the right approach to equal rights can overcome these issues.


AMOI (1988) ‘American Male Opinion Index’, Conde Nast, New York

Angus, L M (1993) Education, inequality, and social id, Routledge, USA/ UK

Astrachan, A (1986) How Males Feel: Their responses to Women’s Needs for Equality and Electrical power, Anchor, New York.

Bad Topics Production Team (1998) Poor subjects: political education for everyday life, NYU Press, USA.

Bekerman, Unces and Zembylas, M (2011) Teaching Competitive Narratives: Identification, Memory and Reconciliation in Peace Education and BeyondAuthorsZvi Bekerman, Michalinos ZembylasPublisherCambridge University or college Press, 2011

Bilimora, G and Piderit, S T (2007) Handbook on girls in business and management, Edward cullen Elgar Publishing, 2007 Cheltenham Glos.

Blanpain, R, Dickens, L and Kaj, S (2008) Issues of Euro employment relationships: employment rules, trade union organization, equal rights, flexicurity, schooling and new approaches to pay out, Kluwer Law International, Holland.

Boyd, H B (2007) Reaction and resistance: feminism, law, and social transform, UBC Press, USA

Burkie, R T and Dark, S (1997), ‘Save the Males: Backlash in Organisations’, Journal of Business Values, 16, 933-942.

Cameron, G (1995) Mental hygiene: The politics of language, Routledge, UK

Carey, A, and Bryant, W (1995) Women-owned business expansion, USA Today, USA

Faludi, S (1991) Backlash: The Undeclared Warfare Against Females, Random Residence, London

Gandossy, R G, Tucker, At the and Verma, N (2006) Workforce wake-up call: the workforce is usually changing, are you?, John Wiley and Daughters, USA

Goode, W M (1982) ‘Why Men Resist’, in N Thorn and M Yalom (eds. ) Rethinking the Family: Several Feminist Concerns, Longman Incorporation. New York

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., , Schwartz, L. K. D. (1998) ‘Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.

Haslett, B, Geis, FL and Carter, M L (1992) The Organizational Woman: Power and Paradox, Greenwood Publishing Group, USA

Kabeer, N, Kampfstark, A and Magnus Elizabeth (2008) Global perspectives in gender equality: reversing the gaze, Routledge, New York as well as Oxford

Kimmel, M (2004) Men and masculinities, ABC-CLIO, USA

Melzer, P (2006) Alien buildings: science fiction and feminist thought, College or university of Tx Press, USA

Mills, M (2001) Difficult violence in schools: an issue of masculinities, Open University or college Press, UK

Mutua, A D (2006) Progressive Black masculinities, CRC Press, UNITED STATES

Nelson, T M (2006) Handbook of gender in archaeology, Rowman Altamira, Lanham

Phillips, Meters (2011) ‘The real purpose our hospitals are a disgrace’, Daily Mail, 17th August 2011, Greater london.

Robinson, H. 2000 ‘Introduction: Visibility, Crisis and the Wounded White Male Body’, in Marked Men: White Masculinity in Crisis, Columbia University Press, New York

Rudman, T A and Glick, G (2001) ‘Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Repercussion Towards Agentic Women’, Record of Cultural Issues, 57: 4, 743-762

Ruxton, S (2004) Sexuality equality and men: listening to advice from practice, Oxfam, UK

United States Small Business Administration (1993) ‘Women Organization Owners’, SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Washington DC

Walby, S (1997) Male or female transformations, Routledge, UK.

Whitehead, S M (2001) The masculinities reader, Wiley-Blackwell, Cambridge.

Whitehead, T M and Moodley, 3rd there’s r (1999) Modifying managers: gendering change in the population sector, Routledge, London.

Wittenberg-Cox, A and Maitland, A (2009) Why Women Mean Business, John Wiley , Sons, USA

Need writing help?

We can write an essay on your own custom topics!