20955659

Oedipus

Everyone has at least one personal flaw that somehow overcomes or beats them in a particular place in time. In this article, two heroes of very different fields will probably be put hand and hand to compare their own tragic flaws. On one hand, Sophocles’ Oedipus is pleased, arrogant and persistent, while on the other hand, Eliot’s Prufrock is usually self conscious, unconfident, and indecisive.

While the two characters happen to be complete extremely opposites, in addition they share a devastating likeness: they are paranoid and in fear of their own fate. Oedipus’ persona is evidently conveyed while having abnormal pride and determination over the play.

This individual first journeys far from Corinth to prevent a great oracle’s prediction that he would kill his father and marry his mother. He arrives in Thebes where people were fixer-upper over the Sphinx’s riddle. Oedipus then models his brain on resolving this question in which he succeeds and is awarded the throne to Thebes. This could have been an enormous boost of confidence for the man who had been worried he’d be cursed for the rest of his life. He serves as a loyal Full for his people, appearing to want to complete the right thing for Thebes, but speaks with these kinds of a conceited attitude.

Inside the play, immediately after receiving information that the earlier king’s monster is residing in Thebes, Oedipus states “Well, I will begin afresh and again make darker things very clear. Right deserving the concern of Phoebus, deserving thine as well, for the dead, I also, ones own meet, will certainly lend my aid to avenge this wrong to Thebes and to the God (Sophocles). With assurance and superiority in his voice, Oedipus throws it in Thebes face that he has saved all of them once ahead of, and will do it again by getting Laius’ killer to justice. He aims on locating the person that killed King Laius and sets all of his energy, take great pride in, and persistence into it.

This individual acts as a wonderful detective and follows every clue vigilantly. This helps the play include the question of solving against the law (Rix). By simply putting together the pieces of the murder puzzle, he finally begins to inquiries himself about his involvement in the killing and even his own fate. Sophocles’ Oedipus pursues self-knowledge and at the same time resistant to it as it may connect him together with his past (Morgenstern). He eventually finds out that he is indeed his father’s killer wonderful mother’s spouse. Oedipus’ tragic flaws of hubris and determination business lead him to blind himself and be expatriate just as elizabeth said would happen to the killer if having been found. In contrast to Oedipus, the smoothness in T. S. Eliot’s “Love Song of M. Alfred Prufrock is timid, insecure and indecisive. Throughout the poem, Prufrock is confronted with a decision to approach a lady he is rolling out a liking to, or remain looking out a lonesome window too much water his personal consciousness in an ocean of self question. He wants to ask her the overwhelming question, but instead this individual purposefully avoids the woman by having personal detour conversations with himself about his personal image. The complete poem is definitely laced with Prufrock requesting himself questions.

He requires “Do I dare disrupt the universe? (Eliot) as though the whole world may come crashing down if this individual simply talks to her. He wants to wait for the right time, but also in the same believed, he is aware of his years are running away, he describes his bald spot and thin hands. Prufrock is so consumed with himself and how others may portray or judge him, that it is paralyzing him coming from social actions and events. He is experiencing a the middle of life turmoil that he might have induced himself by leading an unproductive, boring life wonderful lack of willpower and will to change that lifestyle may business lead him in his fear of being lonesome forever.

Prufrock is essentially intimidated by women or perhaps people in general because he is ashamed of his personal appearance and monotony. One area of his personality features the possibility of creating a relationship but the side of his personal doubt and pity shackles him by living living he is evidently screaming to (Blythe). Towards the end from the poem, he realizes that he will hardly ever summon in the courage approach the person he admires. He gives up upon himself and becomes which he offers wasted his life requesting himself if he must do the things he wanted to perform instead of adding his plans to action.

Where Oedipus is without a doubt expeditious, stern and decisive in the promises, L. Alfred Prufrock is lacking by being captivated with taking his time, indifferent and not able to make a basic choice actually for himself. However quite a few characters share a haunting similarity of fearing the realization that their lives have finally come to a particular point they’ve been attempting to prevent their whole life. Sometimes lifestyle presents a person with a deficiency in personality which becomes highlighted in the spotlight whilst trying to accurate that certain trait.

Regarding Oedipus and Prufrock, their particular life flaws are over exaggerated and yet still overcorrected, in which they will remain bothered with the things they hate about themselves. The two personas failed to avert a lurking curse which in turn had been pursuing them through, eventually securing their destiny with their own personal flaws. Works Cited Blithe, Hal and Sweet, Charlie. “Eliot’s THE LOVE SONG OF J. ALFRED PRUFROCK.  The Explicator 62. two (2004): 108-110. Literary Reference point Center As well as. Web. Eliot, T. S i9000. “The Take pleasure in Song of J. Alfred Prufrock. The Norton Summary of Literature: Shorter Tenth Release. Eds. Allison Booth and Kelly J. Mays. Ny: Norton, 2010. 1015-1019. Print out. Morgenstern, Naomi. “The Oedipus Complex Made Simple.  School Of Toronto Quarterly seventy two. 4 (2003): 777-788. Fictional Reference Middle Plus. Internet. Rix, Robert W. “Was Oedipus Presented?  Orbis Litterarium fifty four. 2 (1999): 134. Fictional Reference Middle Plus. Net. Sophocles. Oedipus the Full. The Norton Introduction to Literary works: Shorter 10th Edition. Eds. Allison Presentation area and Kelly J. Mays. New York: Norton, 2010.