16777933

Kansas City Hyatt Walkway Failure Introduction The Hyatt Regency Hotel was built in Kansas, Missouri 33 years ago. This motel consisted of a 40-story resort tower and conference services, which were connected by an open concept atrium. Inside the innenhof, there were three walkways that connected the hotel towards the conference facilities on the second, third, and fourth floors.

The innenhof was 145 feet very long, 117 ft wide and 50 toes high. On July 17, 1981, about 2, 500 people experienced gathered in the atrium to participate in and watch a party contest.

A bunch stood within the walkways. In 7: 05 PM, the walkways around the second, third, and next floor were packed with guests as they viewed over the energetic lobby, that has been also filled with people. The fourth floor connect was hung directly above the second floor bridge, with all the third ground walkway set off to the side many meters away from other two. Construction problems led to a subtle but flawed design change that doubled the burden on the connection between the next floor pathway support beams and the tie rods having the fat of the second floor pathway.

This new design could scarcely handle the dead load weight from the structure on its own, much less the weight in the spectators sitting on it. The connection failed and both walkways crashed a single on top of the other and after that into the reception below, eliminating 114 persons and wounding more than two hundred others. Mainbody FIG-1 FIG-2 Originally, the 2nd and 4th floor pathways were to be suspended from the same rod (as shown in fig-1) and held in place by nut products.

The first design paintings contained a note specifying a strength of 413 MPa for the hanger fishing rods which was omitted on the final structural drawings. Following the general notes in the absence of a specification on the drawing, the contractor employed hanger supports with only 248 MPa of durability. This initial design, nevertheless , was very impractical as it called for a nut 6. 1 yards up the hanger rod and did not use sleeve nut products. The contractor modified this detail to use 2 hanger rods rather than one (as shown in fig-2) plus the engineer permitted the design modify without looking at it.

This design alter doubled the tension exerted around the nut under the fourth ground beam. This nut reinforced the pounds of 2 walkways instead of just one Conclution FIG-3 FIG-4 None the original neither the as-built design intended for the hanger rod satisfied the Kansas building code making the bond failure inevitable. If, however , the building design and style had included more redundancy this failure may not possess resulted in the complete collapse in the walkway.

Kaminetzky (1991) implies two much stronger design alternatives for the connectors. The toe-to-toe stations used in the Hyatt Regency provided for weak welding which allowed the nut to through the channel/box beam set up initiating the collapse. A back-to-back channel design employing web stiffeners when necessary (fig-3) or the use of bearing crossplates in conjunction with the toe-to-toe channels (fig-4) would have produced the connection stronger making it a lot more difficult intended for the nut to pull through

References Anatomist Ethics ” Lessons Discovered: Kansas City Hyatt Walkway Collapse http://www. pdhengineer. com/Course%20Web/Law%20and%20Ethics%20Courses/hyatt_walkway_collapse. htm “Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse”. School of Engineering, College or university of The state of alabama. http://www. eng. uab. edu/cee/faculty/ndelatte/case_studies_project/Hyatt%20Regency/hyatt. htm#Causes Kaminetzky, Dov, Style and Structure Failures: Lessons from Forensic Investigations (1991). McGraw-Hill, New York, N. Y.