14479719

Essay

Analyse how Having Afraid of Va Woolf? and A Room of One’s Own imaginatively portray people who challenge the established ideals of their time. Books is an assessment of the established values of their time, a manifestation of the composer’s perspectives concerning key issues that characterised all their zeitgeist. This is evident in Virginia Woolf’s polemical article, A Room on the Own (1929), in which your woman portrays male anxiety to women through the post-WWI period.

Likewise, Edward Albee’s 1962 satirical drama, Having Afraid of Va Woolf (Afraid) projects a great analogous fear of female prominence, although in post-WWII American society. In a further comparison, both composers focus on the importance of prosperity in world, where Woolf considers the significance of material protection with regards to hype writing in English world in the 1920s, whilst Albee criticises materialistic values in relation to social conformity in American society in the 1960s.

Since the late 19th hundred years female suffrage movement that empowered women, men dreaded being displaced from their traditional positions of authority. Woolf conveys these types of established patriarchal values by using a Room on the Own, in her study of the phallocentric literary ball of the twenties, where any individual could compose literature, “save they [were] not women. The symbolic title features women’s requirement for material security as a pre-condition “to writ[ing] fiction, arguing that traditionally, men have rejected women options for attaining economic equality.

Woolf’s satrical use of simile reinforces her hypothesis that “if simply Mrs Seton ¦ had learnt the truly great art of making money together left their money, like their very own fathers ¦ to discovered fellowships. This kind of highlights the historical insufficient educational and financial opportunities for women. Furthermore, Woolf blames patriarchal values for institutionalising discriminatory practices in English language society. On the fictional “Oxbridge, a Beadle indicates that “this was the turf, there is the path, symbolising the established sexuality exclusion in academia. Her thoughts cut off, she expresses disappointment “as they had sent my small fish in to hiding.

Through this metaphor, Woolf means that men’s “protection of their turf denied women opportunities intended for creativity, laying out an historical contextual anxiety about female cleverness that was perceived as impeding upon men dominance atlanta divorce attorneys sphere of endeavour. Albee’s contemporary political satire, Frightened, also portrays male and female rivalry, combining textual features such as powerful drama and blunt level directions to convey the fierce gender issue of his time. While both text messages were made up in post-war periods, Albee’s drama savagely critiques the established social values of small town American culture in the 1960s.

This is certainly evident once Martha criticises George because “a great¦big¦fat¦FLOP!  struggling to rise up the departmental rates. The use of raw colloquial language and extreme stage directions accentuates her frustration because she “spits the word by George’s back, reflecting Martha’s authority more than him, which in turn symbolises can certainly growing influence in popular American culture in the 1960s. Furthermore, Martha recalls the “boxing match we all had in an attempt to humiliate him, an love knot for the gendered electrical power struggle.

George reacts negatively, and to gain back superiority, this individual “takes , a short-barrelled shotgun , aims this at ¦ Martha ¦ [and] pulls the trigger. Coupled with this stage course, Albee’s make use of exclamatory punctuation in George’s childish point-scoring of “Pow! You’re dead!  implies his paralyzing desparation to recover his masculinity. In this manner, Albee portrays the constant fighting between George and Martha as a image of anxiety and dysfunctionality in the us in the 1960s, describing the nationwide paranoia associated with the Cold Warfare and nuclear warfare.

Just as Woolf and Albee represent the gender issue in post-war societies, in addition they criticise the wealth inequality and the greed of their time. Whilst Woolf causes that elegance against females often averted them coming from writing fiction, she also views that poor material conditions likewise limited their contribution to literature. Through the use of the modal action-word to emphasise the value of financial reliability, she expresses her contention regarding materials needs that “a woman must have funds and an area of her own in the event that she is to publish fiction.

The anecdote of the tailless kitty is emblematic of the distractions that disrupted women in their writing, as a result Woolf features the need for the privacy of your room of your respective own in order to “think of things in themselves. Furthermore, she decides that “500 pounds 12 months for ever ¦ seemed infinitely more important than the avis movement when it was more favorable to her producing fiction. Not anymore working “like a slave, Woolf’s simile highlights that “food, residence, and garments are permanently mine, showing the value of monetary security in English society in the twenties.

Thus, Woolf sustains her thesis and highlights the importance of money and privacy, offerring the established attitude a secure profits ensured innovative and mental freedom in English culture. Alternatively, Albee’s political allegory reflects his criticism from the materialistic mores of American world in the 1960s, portraying human shallowness in a dramatic appraisal from the American Dream, an idea containing resonated within society because the founding of America.

It epitomises a conservative nationwide ethos that entailed associated with universal wealth and the pursuit of happiness for all those, thus many people sought to enhance their wealth and social status. This kind of materialistic idea is conveyed through Chip, who crudely boasts, “my wife’s received some money. In characterising Nick as the typical short ‘jock’, Albee undermines this concept of the ‘self-made man’, dramatising a soulless aspect of the American Dream. Additionally , Martha criticises George’s salary, reflecting the in-text attitudes of middle-class America, when status was connected with high salary levels.

The lady sneers at George, advising him not really “to waste good liquor¦not on your salary. Here, Martha’s mocking tone captures her disappointment since she “hope[s] that was an empty bottle. However , the “empty bottle also represents her lose hope as George is only “on an Associate Professor’s salary. This kind of brings to mind the sociable importance of cash flow but unlike in Woolf’s society, wherever women’s monetary security may possibly liberate imagination, here financial success is a status mark within the American Dream.

As a result, literature, having its distinct forms and features, is influenced by differing contexts, representing similar concerns that improve our knowledge of the proven values of that time period. Woolf’s controversy, A Room on the Own (1929), may differ textually and contextually from Albee’s Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf (1962), which portrays a savage attack on American values, although both text messages reflect guy fear of females due to their growing influence in post warfare societies. Furthermore, they focus on the importance of wealth to find literary creativeness in The english language society in the 1920s and the realisation of the American Fantasy during the 60s.