Download This Paper Check the price for your custom essay

At the start of The Prince, Machiavelli sets out the different types of principalities which constitute all forms of government. He then goes on to give advice on how a reliable ruler would go about keeping a stronghold in the principality he had simply conquered. Although maybe not as blatant as additional political leaders’ attempts at gaining control after a great invasion of any country, George Bush, acquiring action in 2003, decided to firmly plant an America influence in Iraq.

“The Decider,  since the Leader recently reported himself, decided on a path which has clear parallels to circumstances outlined in The Prince. Within the pages of The Royal prince, Machiavelli has given very much advice regarding how to deal with the present situation when the President at this point finds himself. Leaving out moral consideration in the actions each of our President features taken and must ingest the future, this paper will explore the relationship between the theories found in The Prince and the current condition in Iraq and try to answer the question of what advice Machiavelli would give to President Bush to ease his current condition.

In the beginning in the Prince, Machiavelli claims that every governments are either republics or principalities. As he has already outlined what creates a republic, The Prince is concerned with just principalities. As he points out, there are three different types of principalities, hereditary, new, and combined.

A genetic principality may be the sort that is certainly passed via ruler to ruler in the same friends and family. Is it doesn’t typical monarchial relationship in which a king, once no longer able to rule, moves his empire over to the next in line, generally his boy. New principalities will be entirely fresh territories to be ruled over, and combined principalities will be new additions to existing areas. It really is this previous kind of principality that this paper will be interested in as it is the majority of readily illustrated with the current situation in Iraq.

To comprehend the relationship between Machiavelli’s concepts and the particular Bush operations is currently involved with in the warfare there, it is necessary to understand the the past of War.

Iraq was formed from 3 former Ottoman regions, Basra, Baghdad, and Mosul. It was directed at the United Kingdom at the end of Globe War My spouse and i as a mandate. The uk granted Korea independence in 1932 but invaded in 1941 because it seemed that the government there were threatening Western oil materials. The U. T then occupied the country for several years and installed a monarchy to guideline the region.

This kind of monarchy held up until a coup d’etat led by Iraqi armed service overthrew it in 1958. After this government was itself overthrown, the Iraqi Ba’ath party gained control and out of this went up Saddam Hussein. Hussein ruled War until taken out of power by the United States in 2003. (Wikipedia 2006)

Although most likely in the eyes of Hussein, Iraq could possibly be considered a monarchy, it had been more often considered a dictatorship. And because when the United States invaded Iraq they were certainly not invading a new territory, Iraq as a principality would, by Machiavellian criteria, be considered not just a hereditary or new principality, but mixed. It can be these sorts of principalities that, in Machiavelli’s words and phrases, “¦are those that present concerns. 

Apart from the hereditary principalities, in which the people of the territory will not, as confirmed by their dedication to the King’s family, head the difference in power, a mixed principality, because the people have been beneath the rule of 1 man (as in the case of Iraq), will not consider well to the new leader unless their situation enhances. Machiavelli’s musings in human nature reveal the idea that everybody is generally looking out for themselves and those close to them.

They are generally indifferent to politics when ever things are running nicely for themselves. For this reason, if the people’s scenario improves even a small amount and provides them the impression of safety and security, it will not genuinely matter to them that is in control. As confirmed by the daily insurgent episodes, kidnappings and suicide bombings, President Rose bush has not a new feeling of to safeguard the people of Iraq. Is it any wonder the fact that vast majority of the Iraqi’s usually do not want all of us there? President Rose bush has failed to achieve even this kind of first goal of proficient rule presented by Machiavelli.

In The Knight in shining armor, Machiavelli uses the example of rulers being just like foxes and lions to prove a point about what produces a competent leader. He says this in Chapter 20: How Rulers Are to Keep Their Word. As he states, “Everybody recognizes how praiseworthy it is for a leader to keep his world and also to live a life of integrity, with out relying on craftiness. Nevertheless, we see that in practice¦ those rulers who have certainly not thought that important to maintain their term have obtained great things¦

For this reason, Machiavelli believes this important to be able to rule and fight in two ways. The initially, the way males fight, by the rules. The second is the way in which animals fight, no contains barred. “Because you are unable to always win when you value the rules, you must be prepared to break them. A ruler needs to know how to become both an animal and a man. 

In Machiavelli’s view, because a leader must sometimes display “beastly qualities, it is necessary to know how to act like specific animals, specifically, a lion and a fox. The lion is powerful, and operates over his enemies with great mite, but has the disadvantage of not being able to avoid blocks. The fox, alternatively, has the sneaky to avoid those traps. So it is very important to the leader to be able to perform like both family pets and to know when the scenario calls for both brute durability, or peaceful cunning.

Although many people typically make fun of the President, with regards to him since not as well bright, this individual did sell off a battle to the American people plus the world depending on lies. As just lately reported by Reuters, the Light House was informed by the CIA six months previous to the invasion of Iraq that there were no weapons of mass break down. This, along with countless different officials and documents demonstrate that the Rose bush administration realized what many of us know right now, that Korea was in absolutely no way the threat they were identified to be.

Of course , there was not a way for him at the time to know that the universe would find out that he was not sharing with to truth and if there was, maybe he would not have applied the rationale of weapons of mass devastation but identified another way to receive enough support to seep into Iraq. Nevertheless, he was cunning enough to know when to use dread and treatment to rally the people at the rear of him and achieved his aims by making use of many countries.

In Machiavelli’s time, right now there would not have already been governmental leaks to the magnitude that we have today, and any individual courageous enough to speak out about ruling governments were more than likely going to be murdered. In the event Bush were ruling with circumstances comparable to what they had been in Italy in the time of Machiavelli, most likely he would had been more successful.

Yet , now that Bush finds him self in the placement that he can in, the question could be asked what advice might Machiavelli give to the President. The answer for this question lies in chapter five of The Knight in shining armor: How You Should Govern Cities or Kingdoms That, Ahead of You Attained Them, Existed Under Their particular Laws. As Machiavelli explains, “When the declares one acquires by cure are comfortable with living beneath their own laws and regulations and in freedom, there are three policies anybody can follow in order to hold on to these people. Even though it could be discussed whether War was “free the overall that means of Machiavelli still does apply.

“The initially is to put them to squander. With all the advent of the international legal court as well as the necessity of to get peace and favor of ones allies, President Bush could not view this 1st option as possible. “The second is always to go and live generally there in person. I extremely doubt President Bush provides, or ever will consider such a measure. And, “The third is to but let them continue to live under their particular laws, cause them to become pay you, and create there an administrative and politics elite who will remain devoted to you. 

This third option is definitely the one the Bush government is subsequent. Although the Iraqi’s are generally not paying income taxes directly to america, once the system gets working again, Almost certainly we will take our repayment in the form of essential oil.

If someone from old Italy were familiar with Machiavelli and his works and were alive today, they would discover much Machiavellian inspiration inside the governmental techniques of the Bush administration. Whether Leader Bush is aware of it or not, he’s giving us a first hands account of what happens the moment Machiavellian principles are followed. The interesting simple truth is that it appears these rules would just work today if the conditions were just right. Nevertheless, most of Bush’s detractors would probably like to see him carry selected of Machiavelli’s ideas to another type of level, specifically the second option of ruling a newly obtained kingdom, move there.

Functions Cited

War. Retrieved 04 22, 06\, from Wikipedia Web site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq

Reuters, (2006, April 22). CIA Aware Bush of No Weaponry in War. Retrieved April 22, 2006

Wootton, David (Ed. ). (1995). The Prince. Indiana, IN: Hackett Publishing Firm.

Need writing help?

We can write an essay on your own custom topics!

Check the Price