11137373

Inside the novel, The Scarlett Notice, the character that is the most impressive morally ambiguous character is usually Reverend Dimmesdale. He can become identified as none good neither evil due to many reasons, which includes his thunderous secret to be an adulterist, his arbitrary acts of claiming sweet nothings to the people of the church, his sermons secretly related to his life dispersing a powerful meaning, and ultimately his admission of doing adultery with Hester.

The importance of his moral ambiguity to the new as a whole can be seen as a topic in the novel, that the ends can warrant the means.

First, the Reverend has received an bogus child with one of the ladies of the town, Hester Prynne, which is presumptuously seen as a great act of evil. Together with committing such an action, Reverend Dimmesdale would not identify him self as the father of the child for a better part of the new. One may well ask one self, why might a member of the church devote such a sinful action?

This is an unexplainable issue and even sarcastic. A person of this kind of holy stature would commonly never perform such a sinful actions, assuming his position inside the church. Together with his fatidico sin of committing coition, despite becoming a leader with the church, this individual commits a venial trouble by concealing his wrongful actions to the entire town, which in my personal opinion is just as bad. In retrospect, Reverend Dimmesdale’s guilty actions could only business lead one to imagine he is without a doubt a person of bad nature.

Although Dimmesdale’s actions have been actions of genuine evil, his recognition of his wrongdoings has played out an important function in his occupation of faith through his sermons, which can ultimately be seen while actions great nature. In the novel, Reverend Dimmesdale communicates to the community, through the power of words, examples of sinners just like himself and the wrongful actions, without telling the townspeople his sins. Despite his sins great inability to talk about them, Dimmesdale commits an action that could be seen as pure good by telling the users of the house of worship what to refrain from giving.

All in all, it appears that the bad in Dimmesdale is being covered up trough the good actions that has come of them, such as being a educator to all from the churchgoers. Finally, the most notable action of Dimmesdale that can be seen as an action of pure great, is his confession of committing adultery with Hester. At the end in the novel, Reverend Dimmesdale confesses to the townspeople that he is the father of Hester’s daughter, Pearl, simply by showing the crowd his branded upper body, immediately preceding his death.

Although it required the reverend the entire book to declare to his sins, this shows that he’s truly great despite his acts of evil. To summarize, Reverend Dimmesdale’s actions none define him as good neither evil, yet somewhere between. He is not an evil person because great came from his evil activities, nor is this individual good due to his pudgy sins. Reverend Dimmesdale’s undefined character jewelry to a theme in the book pertaining to the question: Do the ends justify the means?

Put simply, does the end result make the activities taken to be able to such a result okay? Regarding the novel, the ends certainly justify the means, Dimmesdale and Hester’s appreciate for each different led those to commit adultery which ultimately enabled these to express their particular fierce appreciate for one another. Furthermore, the ends: expressing their love justifies the means: committing adultery mainly because these actions were in order to that they could be happy with each other, which is the main factor.