55280852

Download This Paper

Biology 101 Fat free popcorn experiment Laboratory partners Robert Barham Michelle hall Diva Mancada Kelley Pritt 1 Introduction Fat free popcorn, or swallowing corn, can be described as type of hammer toe which blows up from a kernel and puffs up when heated up. It is a well-known snack food, particularly in movie theaters. Snacks can be salted or sweetened.

Air jumped popcorn is naturally high in dietary fiber, low in calories from fat and fat, contains no sodium and is sugar free. This may make that an attractive snack food for people with calorie or dietary restrictions. Considerable amounts of excess fat, sugar and sodium in many cases are added to well prepared popcorn tat can turn it into a high calorie snack. speculation Orvill Redenbacher has greater popped kernels and less un-popped kernels than Act 2. 3 Material Method Two brand name fat free popcorn packages happen to be being tested. Act II and Orvill Redenbacher. Both are tested in the same micro wave. The same time will be used (2. 5 Minutes). Both plans were considered before and after the popping method, the outcome was recorded. Total cooking time was measured and recorded for both snacks packages. 12 randomly selected popped kernels from every package had been measured using a ruler and results were noted. Average size for the two were worked out and noted. All un-popped kernels ere collected via each deal and considered in a dish. The pounds of the dish was subtracted from the total weight to obtain the weight of un-popped kernels from each brand. The proportion was computed and as opposed. 4 Benefits Weight before cooking Orvill Redenbacher , 104. 77g Act II , ninety-seven. 9g *Act II deal is smaller tan Orvill Redenbacher simply by 6. 84g. Table one particular *Microwave termes conseillés was arranged for 2 . 5 minutes? *Table 1 shows that Orvill Redenbacher has a faster cooking time than Act II. Weight following cooking Take action II 87. 6g Um. R. 93. 85g *Act II package is less space-consuming than Orvill Redenbacher by 6. 79g Table 2? (Calculations) 3. 14g/87. 06 back button 100 sama dengan 3. 6% and several. 42g/93. 85g x 100 = a few. 6% *The Results showed that the percentage of un-popped kernels in both deals was the same. Table three or more (Popped kernels in mm)? Table several showed the fact that average size of popped kernels of Orvill Redenbacher was larger than Act II. a few Discussion The results demonstrated that Orvill Redenbacher manufacturer had more quickly cooking time than Act 2 and weighed more total. The experiment also confirmed that the two brands acquired the same percentage of un-popped kernels.

As Orville Redenbacher weighed a lot more than Act 2 we were capable of determine that Orville Redenbacher had more un-popped kernels by pounds The research also confirmed that the size of the popped kernels was larger inside the Orville Redenbacher brand. 6th Conclusion The hypothesis was partially maintained the data. Orville Redenbacer company has bigger popped kernels than Take action II. The percentage of un-popped kernels in both brands was the same but , the weight with the un-popped kernels in the Orville Redenbacher brand was more due to the higher un-popped pounds of the bundle.

Need writing help?

We can write an essay on your own custom topics!